- #1
jackmccarron
- 4
- 0
Hi - I live full time in an RV that is surrounded by aluminum - essentially a faraday cage, except for a few rather small windows. I'd like to mount a WiFi antenna on the roof and run a cable in a window or thru a small hole.
Basic issue - how to get a good signal from a campground WiFi inside my "faraday cage" RV without adding active amplifiers, etc.
My laptops have built in antennas in the display lids, so I'd like to somehow couple the outside signal into my laptops inside (without a DIRECT connection to the WiFi card inside the laptops). I want, instead, to RE-RADIATE the signal from the cable to the laptops. 802.11b and 802.11g WiFi networking equipment operates at a range of frequencies from 2.412 GHz to 2.462 GHz.
Can I simply terminate the inside cable with a short piece of wire to re-radiate the signal (now inside instead of outside my cage)? How long should the piece of wire be (assuming a 14 gauge copper wire)? Should I ground the cable shield to the RV frame on one end or both? Will this work at all? Maybe I could put the cable radiator OUTSIDE the small window where my laptops are?
Any better ideas?
Thanks,
Jack
Basic issue - how to get a good signal from a campground WiFi inside my "faraday cage" RV without adding active amplifiers, etc.
My laptops have built in antennas in the display lids, so I'd like to somehow couple the outside signal into my laptops inside (without a DIRECT connection to the WiFi card inside the laptops). I want, instead, to RE-RADIATE the signal from the cable to the laptops. 802.11b and 802.11g WiFi networking equipment operates at a range of frequencies from 2.412 GHz to 2.462 GHz.
Can I simply terminate the inside cable with a short piece of wire to re-radiate the signal (now inside instead of outside my cage)? How long should the piece of wire be (assuming a 14 gauge copper wire)? Should I ground the cable shield to the RV frame on one end or both? Will this work at all? Maybe I could put the cable radiator OUTSIDE the small window where my laptops are?
Any better ideas?
Thanks,
Jack