- #36
- 15,160
- 8,515
Referring to #33, I followed a different route. Starting from
##\ddot\phi(\frac 13-(\mu \sin(\phi)- \cos(\phi))\cos(\phi))=(\mu \sin(\phi)- \cos(\phi))(1-{\dot\phi}^2\sin(\phi)))## and with ##\dot \phi =0##,
I got ##\ddot\phi=\frac{\mu \sin(\phi)- \cos(\phi)}{\frac 13-(\mu \sin(\phi)- \cos(\phi))\cos(\phi)}## which I plotted for two "typical" values of ##\mu## (see below). From the plots it is clear that the condition must be ##\mu \sin(\phi) > \cos(\phi)##. Specifically, additional plots (not shown) indicate that the denominator stays positive for ##\mu## less than about 4/3 which is above what one would expect for blocks sliding on surfaces. So I think that's it.
##\ddot\phi(\frac 13-(\mu \sin(\phi)- \cos(\phi))\cos(\phi))=(\mu \sin(\phi)- \cos(\phi))(1-{\dot\phi}^2\sin(\phi)))## and with ##\dot \phi =0##,
I got ##\ddot\phi=\frac{\mu \sin(\phi)- \cos(\phi)}{\frac 13-(\mu \sin(\phi)- \cos(\phi))\cos(\phi)}## which I plotted for two "typical" values of ##\mu## (see below). From the plots it is clear that the condition must be ##\mu \sin(\phi) > \cos(\phi)##. Specifically, additional plots (not shown) indicate that the denominator stays positive for ##\mu## less than about 4/3 which is above what one would expect for blocks sliding on surfaces. So I think that's it.