Will There Be a Collision in the Shaw Paradox?

In summary, the paradox of a collision between a moving steel plate and a contracted meterstick is resolved by considering the perspective of the observer in the rest system of the plate. Due to time dilation, the meterstick will pass through the hole before the steel plate reaches the origin, preventing a collision.
  • #1
briteliner
66
0

Homework Statement




A very thin steel plate with a circular hole m

1 in diameter centered
on the y-axis lies parallel to the xz plane in frame S and moves in the +y
direction at a constant speed y
v (as illustrated in Figure 1-44 of the text).
A meterstick lying on the x-axis moves in the +x direction with c
v/
=
β .
The steel plate arrives at the 0
=
y plane at the same instant that the
center of the meterstick reaches the origin of S. Since the meterstick is
observed by observers in S to be contracted, it passes through the m

1
hole in the plate with no problem. A paradox appears to arise when one
considers that an observer in S′, the rest system of the meterstick,
measures the diameter of the hole in the plate to be contracted in the x
dimension and, hence, becomes too small to pass the meterstick,
resulting in a collision. Resolve the paradox. Will there be a collision?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Homework Equations The Attempt at a Solution No, there will not be a collision. The paradox arises because the observer in S' sees the steel plate moving in the -y direction and the meterstick moving in the -x direction. In the rest system of the plate, the meterstick's diameter is not contracted, so it can pass through the hole. However, due to time dilation, the observer in S' will perceive the meterstick as passing through the hole before the steel plate reaches the origin, resulting in no collision between the two objects.
 

FAQ: Will There Be a Collision in the Shaw Paradox?

What is the "Relativity, R. Shaw paradox"?

The "Relativity, R. Shaw paradox" refers to a thought experiment proposed by physicist R. Shaw in the early 1900s to demonstrate the principles of relativity. It involves two identical twins, one of whom stays on Earth while the other travels through space at high speeds, and the paradox arises when the traveling twin returns to Earth and is found to have aged less than the twin who stayed on Earth.

How does the "Relativity, R. Shaw paradox" relate to Einstein's theory of relativity?

The "Relativity, R. Shaw paradox" is often used to explain the concepts of time dilation and the relativity of simultaneity, which are fundamental principles of Einstein's theory of relativity. It helps to illustrate the idea that time and space are relative and can be affected by factors such as velocity and gravitational forces.

Is the "Relativity, R. Shaw paradox" a real paradox or just a thought experiment?

The "Relativity, R. Shaw paradox" is considered a thought experiment, as it is not a real-life scenario that has been observed or tested. However, it is based on the principles of relativity and has been used to further understand and explain these concepts.

Can the "Relativity, R. Shaw paradox" be observed or proven in real life?

While the thought experiment itself cannot be observed or proven in real life, the principles it showcases have been confirmed through various experiments and observations. For example, the effects of time dilation have been observed in experiments with atomic clocks and in high-speed particle accelerators.

What is the significance of the "Relativity, R. Shaw paradox" in the field of physics?

The "Relativity, R. Shaw paradox" is significant in that it helps to illustrate and explain some of the key principles of Einstein's theory of relativity, which has had a major impact on modern physics. It has also sparked further research and experimentation in this field, leading to a deeper understanding of the nature of time and space.

Similar threads

Back
Top