Wire Temperature Increase Equation?

  • Thread starter Jake110
  • Start date
In summary, Bob suggests that to calculate the power dissipated by an electromagnet, you need to know the coil resistance, the wire gauge, the number of turns, and the current. He also suggests using an equation to calculate the final temperature.
  • #1
Jake110
31
0
Since running a current through a wire will increase the temperature of the wire, is there an equation for calculating the increase in temperature?

I’m thinking it would vary depending on the cross sectional area of the wire, the temperature of the surrounding material, the starting temperature of the wire, the specific heat capacity of the wire.

I’m planning on making an electromagnet and I started thinking about this when I was trying to decide what grade wire to use.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It can be calculated, but it is somewhat tricky (unless you have a VERY simple case with a loing straight wire with no insulation and only conductive heating you probably need numerical simulations) and for real applications it is usually better to just look in the datasheet.

Also, an electromagnet is not a wire(!); the fact that you many layers of wire will have a significant effect on the temperature. Your best bet is to simply use a wire/curent where the increase in temperature is so small that it won't have any practical effect.
 
  • #3
It is best to look up the resistance of the wire in a table. See awg table in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_wire_gauge

Decide on what wattage the coil can dissipate; 1 W, 5 W, etc.

Select wire gauge, number of turns, calculate W = I2R (where I is current and R is the coil resistance). Iterate as necessary.

Bob S
 
  • #4
f95toli: that’s why I’m having trouble figuring out what grade of wire to use, sure there are amp limits for non bundled wire on the AWG wiki page but I can’t find any amp limit for the wires when they are bundled together like in an electromagnet. I was thinking I could use a chain equation where the surrounding temperature for the outer most layer of wire would use the air temperature and then each lower layer would use the temperature of the layer above it.

It’s really annoying because I don't want to get the wire and then find that the layers of wire at the core have melted.

Bob S: at the moment I don’t know what wattage I need because I’m putting together an excel document that calculates different values for an electromagnet. My aim is to end up with something where you just input some basic values and it will give you the harder to find details you need for actually building them.

The number of turns depends on the thickness of the wire and that would depend on the number of layers and the voltage of the power supply. If I could find some kind of max amps for 1 layer of this type of wire but decrease by a ratio of Y for each additional layer. That would be perfect.

The idea I had was that it’s ok if I have a really hard time figuring everything out now so that I can make it easier for if I do it again later.

I guess I could try to put an equation together myself if I could get a load of different grades of wire, although that would be pretty hard since I’m a student with no money lol.
 
  • #5
Heating above ambient temp. is proportional to I^2 and the surface area available to dissipate that heat.
 
  • #6
i don't know, it seems to simple. wouldn't it use more variables than just current, surface area?

f95toli what way were you thinking of? i can deal with somewhat tricky.
 
  • #7
This would be my approach to your problem: For a given wire gauge determine how long the wire will need to be (i.e. number of windings/layers). Find the total resistance from the resistivity (rho=1.72E-8 ohm-m for copper, rho = R*L/A, L=length, A=cross sectional area). For a given current this will give you a dissipated power; for a 30 cm long 30AWG wire carrying 0.5 amps it comes out to 25 mW (Q).

Assume an exposed surface area (can estimate from geometry/#layers), I'll just make a guess of 1/4 of the overall wire surface area (A_s), and guess at a convection coefficient (h) of 10 W/m2-C (in the range of natural convection). Plugging this into Q=h*A_s*(T-T_0) while using 25C as ambient temperature (T_0) gives me a temperature of 67C. Then play with the variables, make parametric tables, etc.

Then a few questions you need to ask yourself - how accurate does this need to be - e.g. is a 20% error acceptable? Will conduction be a large factor (check thermal resistances)? Are there enough layers that there will be a substantial temperature gradient between layers? Is the wire insulated? And probably some others that I'm missing.
 
  • #8
Your using the equation W = I2R that Bob S posted to find Q right? Q being power.

So T_0 is the temperate it’s at to begin with and T is the final temperature? It can be rearranged to form

[tex]
T = \frac{Q}{h*A_0} + T_0
[/tex]

And using the melting point of copper (1357.77 K) I can determine if it’s an acceptable level of current and Gauge of wire. Well that’s just the basic version; the wire I’ll use will be insulated so ill need to look into what type of insulation it is and make sure it doesn't go above its melting point.

How many layers would be needed to cause a substantial temperature gradient? I could use anywhere between 5-20 layers of wire depending on what size power source I use.

The convection coefficient (h) needed in the above equation, how would you calculate it?
 
  • #9
Well, first I should mention that if I were doing this as a project I would probably use the rated current capacity of the wire.

The T_0 is actually the ambient temperature, but you could assume that is the starting temperature of the wire as well if everything were at ambient conditions. As far as the temperature gradient, you could approximate the windings as being a plane wall with an adiabatic inner surface, and estimate the overall thermal conductivity. The inner (i.e. maximum) temperature (T_inner) would be given by

[tex]T_{inner}=\frac{\dot{g}\cdot th^{2}}{2 k}+T_{s}[/tex]

where g_dot is the volumetric internal heat generation (from Joule heating, i.e. I^2*R), k is the thermal conductivity, th is the thickness, and T_s is the surface temperature. I plugged in some numbers and I don't think this should be an issue. For the convection coefficient, h, it can get pretty complex, and there are more equations than I have time to write. If you want to get into that take a look at a heat transfer textbook and look at the section(s) on free convection. Otherwise, I've seen typical free convection coefficients listed as being 2-25 W/m2-K for gases.
 
  • #10
When I have built electromagnets in the past, I usually start by calculating the required amp turns. This is easy to calculate if it is either air core, or iron dominated (with a small air gap) electromagnet. Then I would use Excel or similar program to calculate the heat output of various coil configurations. If possible, use higher amperage and lower number of turns, because heat conduction is better. For convection air-cooled coils, my guess is that 5W for a fist-size coil is about the limit. Use nylon, enamel or Formvar coated wire for best packing density. My gauge of heat limit is whether the coil (and/or the iron) is too hot to touch after 1 hour of operation. If you can smell it, it is too hot.
Bob S
 
  • #11
thats a pretty good rule "If you can smell it, it is too hot".

the only recommended current limits I've found are just for single wires, not windings.

i'll aim to keep it using the least number of layers so i don't need to worry about temperature gradients.

as for the convection coefficient, would just using 25 be reasonable?
 
  • #12
I think 25 is too high. I would go for 10 W/m2degC or less. You haven't said whether the coil is on CW or pulsed on and off.
Bob S
 
  • #13
Onderdonk and Preece

16 gauge copper wire: Tmelt = 1083°C, Area = 2581 circ mil, Time = 5 sec,diam = .0524 inches, Tamb = 25°C

E= Area in CM
B = Tmelt - Tamb in deg. C
D = 234-Tambient in deg. C
T= time in seconds.
So, E = 2581, B= 1058, D=209, T=5
Then
Ifuse = E* SQRT {<LOG[(B/D)+1]>/(T*33)}
Ifuse = 2581* SQRT {<LOG[(1058/210)+1]>/165}
Ifuse = 2581* SQRT {<LOG(6.04)>/165}
Ifuse = 2581* SQRT {0.781/165}
Ifuse = 2581* SQRT {.00473}
Ifuse = 2581* 0.0688
Ifuse = 178A

Solve Onderdonk for T
(Ifuse/E)^2 = <LOG[(B/D)+1]>/(T*33)
(T*33)= <LOG[(B/D)+1]>/{(Ifuse/E)^2}
T= <LOG[(B/D)+1]>/[33*{(Ifuse/E)^2}]

So, Ifuse = 178A, E = 2581, B= 1058, D=209

T= <LOG[6.06]>/[33*{.00476}]
T= <0.782>/[0.157]
T= 4.98 sec.


For #14 copper, CM = 4110.
B=1058
D=210
E=4110
I = 400A
B/D + 1 = 6.0381
(400/4110)^2= 9.4719E-3
<>=0.78090
[]=0.31257
T= <LOG[(B/D)+1]>/[33*{(Ifuse/E)^2}]
T=~2 sec

Using Preece equation: with 10244 for copper
and .0524 diameter
= 10244*.0524"^1.5 = 123 Amps

And

Discovered by Joseph Fourier in the 1807, Equation No. 1 is sometimes called the Fourier heat transfer equation. The equation in section 310-15(c) of the NEC, as seen below, called the Neher-McGrath equation, is a more complex version of the Fourier heat transfer equation. The Neher-McGrath equation was discovered by two cable engineers in 1957. In the Neher-McGrath (NM) equation, Delta TD, is a term added to the ambient temperature, TA, to compensate for heat generated in the jacket and insulation for higher voltages. Delta TD is called the dielectric loss temperature rise and is insignificant for voltages below 2000. Another term in the NM equation, (1+YC), is a multiplier used to convert direct current resistance (RDC) to alternating current resistance or impedance. For wire sizes smaller than No. 2 this term becomes insignificant.
 
  • #14
Bob S said:
I think 25 is too high. I would go for 10 W/m2degC or less. You haven't said whether the coil is on CW or pulsed on and off.
Bob S

It’s going to be pulsed. I’ll just use 10 for h then. Thanks for all the help guys, really appreciate it.
 

Related to Wire Temperature Increase Equation?

1. What is the Current-Temperature equation and what does it represent?

The Current-Temperature equation, also known as the Arrhenius equation, is an empirical relationship that describes the effect of temperature on the rate of chemical reactions. It represents the relationship between the rate constant (k) and the temperature (T).

2. How is the Current-Temperature equation derived?

The equation was first proposed by Swedish chemist Svante Arrhenius in 1889. It is based on the concept that increasing the temperature will increase the kinetic energy of molecules, leading to more frequent and energetic collisions between reactant molecules, thus increasing the rate of reaction.

3. What is the significance of the Current-Temperature equation in chemistry?

The equation is widely used in chemistry to understand and predict the effect of temperature on reaction rates. It is also used in industrial processes to optimize reaction conditions and increase reaction rates, which can lead to cost and time savings.

4. How is the Current-Temperature equation related to the activation energy?

The Current-Temperature equation is directly related to the activation energy (Ea) of a reaction. The activation energy is the minimum amount of energy required for a reaction to occur. The equation demonstrates that increasing the temperature decreases the activation energy, making it easier for a reaction to occur.

5. What are some limitations of the Current-Temperature equation?

The Current-Temperature equation is based on several assumptions and has some limitations. It assumes that the reaction is a simple, single-step process, and does not take into account the effect of pressure or catalysts. Moreover, the equation may not be applicable for reactions with very high or very low temperatures.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
823
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
565
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
846
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
2
Replies
43
Views
2K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top