Work Done by F on a Ball: Path or Displacement?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work done by a constant force F on a ball and whether this work depends on the path taken or the straight-line displacement. It is clarified that the work done is determined by the component of the displacement in the direction of the force, emphasizing the importance of the scalar product of vectors. The calculation involves the displacement from the bottom to a height H, represented as sqrt(2LH). Ultimately, the work done depends on the displacement rather than the specific path taken. Understanding this concept is crucial for accurately determining the work in physics scenarios.
wolovemm
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
untitled.GIF

the question is what is the work done by F on the ball
so this is what i did
since F is constant we can apply
untitled2.GIF

and now here's my question, does the work done in this case depends on the path (curve) or the displacement (straight line)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
untitled.GIF

so I'm trying to find the work done by F on the ball

and this is what i got
texserver.gif

where
sqrt(2LH) is the displacement from the bottom to the position with height H.

So, I'm just wondering if this is correct or I'm missing something
 
Last edited:
wolovemm said:
and now here's my question, does the work done in this case depends on the path (curve) or the displacement (straight line)?
It depends on the component of the displacement in the direction of the force. (Read up on the meaning of the scalar/dot product of two vectors.)
 
it depenson dsplacement...kinectic converted into gravitational
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top