Work done by vector field on straight path

In summary, the student is trying to find the function F that represents the path between (1,4,2) and (0,5,1). They made a mistake with the straight line and now need to integrate between 0 and 1 to fix it.
  • #1
sa1988
222
23

Homework Statement



4sn1hs.png



Homework Equations



W= ∫F.dr

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm fairly sure I've done the right thing, however my lecturer hasn't uploaded any solutions to any of these problems (which is ridiculous - how am I supposed to learn if I don't know when I'm right or wrong?!) So I'm putting it over to physics forums for some general opinion on my answer.

The path between (1,4,2) and (0,5,1) is a simple move of (-1,-1,-1),

This parameterises to a move of (-t,-t,-t) for 0<t<1

and means x= -t, y= -t, z= -t

so dr = (-t,-t,-t) = (-1,-1,-1)dt

and F = (x, 3xy, -(x+z)) = (-t, 3t2, 2t)

Which gives ∫F.dr = (-t, 3t2, 2t )(-1,-1,-1)dt

= ∫ (t -3t2 - 2t) dt

= [t2/2 - t3 - t2] , 0<t<1

= -3/2 units of work

So am I right? Or mostly right? Or mostly wrong? Or totally wrong?

Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
sa1988 said:

Homework Statement



4sn1hs.png


Homework Equations



W= ∫F.dr

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm fairly sure I've done the right thing, however my lecturer hasn't uploaded any solutions to any of these problems (which is ridiculous - how am I supposed to learn if I don't know when I'm right or wrong?!) So I'm putting it over to physics forums for some general opinion on my answer.

The path between (1,4,2) and (0,5,1) is a simple move of (-1,-1,-1),

This parameterises to a move of (-t,-t,-t) for 0<t<1

and means x= -t, y= -t, z= -t

No. The path in the question is a straight line from (1,4,2) to (0,5,1). The path (-t,-t,-t) with [itex]0 \leq t \leq 1[/itex] is a straight line from (0,0,0) to (-1,-1,-1).

You can always parametrize the straight line between [itex]\mathbf{a}[/itex] and [itex]\mathbf{b}[/itex] as [itex]\mathbf{r}(t) = \mathbf{a} + (\mathbf{b} - \mathbf{a})t[/itex] for [itex]0 \leq t \leq 1[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #3
pasmith said:
No. The path in the question is a straight line from (1,4,2) to (0,5,1). The path (-t,-t,-t) with [itex]0 \leq t \leq 1[/itex] is a straight line from (0,0,0) to (-1,-1,-1).

You can always parametrize the straight line between [itex]\mathbf{a}[/itex] and [itex]\mathbf{b}[/itex] as [itex]\mathbf{r}(t) = \mathbf{a} + (\mathbf{b} - \mathbf{a})t[/itex] for [itex]0 \leq t \leq 1[/itex].


Hmm I think my method of parameterisation worked?

I actually made a mistake in the straight line. It's not (-1,-1,-1), it's (-1, 1,-1).

However, even in the form r(t) = a+(b-a)t, I still get dr=(-1, 1,-1)dt, just as I had before (apart from the sign error for one of the terms).

So I presume the part I'm wrong with is the bit where I suggested x=-t, y=-t, z=-t ?

I need to be able to set the the vector F so it's represented by the parameter t, so F[x(t),y(t),z(t)].

So then I can do the dot product F.dr = F(t).r(t)dt to bring out an integral purely in t.

How would I do that? I think my main problem now is giving F in terms of t.

Thanks
 
  • #4
sa1988 said:
Hmm I think my method of parameterisation worked?

I actually made a mistake in the straight line. It's not (-1,-1,-1), it's (-1, 1,-1).

That is indeed [itex]\dfrac{d\mathbf{r}}{dt}[/itex]. What's [itex]\mathbf{r}(t)[/itex]?

How would I do that? I think my main problem now is giving F in terms of t.

Having found [itex]\mathbf{r}(t)[/itex], and my previous post tells you all you need to find it, you substitute it into the given expression for [itex]\mathbf{F}(\mathbf{r})[/itex] in order to calculate [itex]\mathbf{F}(\mathbf{r}(t)) \cdot \dfrac{d\mathbf{r}}{dt}[/itex], which is the function you need to be integrating with respect to [itex]t[/itex] from 0 to 1.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #5
Aaaaaahhhhhhhhhhh.

From r(t) I get:

x= 1-t
y= 4+t
z= 2-t

So then I have

F[r(t)].(dr/dt)dt

= (x, 3xy, -(x+z).(-1, 1,-1)dt

= (1-t, 3(1-t)(4+t), 2t-3).(-1,1,-1)dt

= -3t2-10t+13

Then do the integral between 0<t<1

Final answer of 8.

Fantastic. My stumbling point was parameterisation of F(x,y,z) and now I understand. Thank you very much!
 

FAQ: Work done by vector field on straight path

What is work done by a vector field on a straight path?

The work done by a vector field on a straight path is the product of the magnitude of the vector field and the displacement along the path. It represents the amount of energy transferred from the vector field to an object moving along the path.

How is work done by a vector field on a straight path calculated?

The work done by a vector field on a straight path can be calculated by taking the dot product of the vector field and the displacement vector along the path. This is represented by the equation W = F · d, where W is work, F is the vector field, and d is the displacement vector.

What is the unit of measurement for work done by a vector field on a straight path?

The unit of measurement for work done by a vector field on a straight path is joules (J). This is the same unit used to measure energy.

Can the work done by a vector field on a straight path be negative?

Yes, the work done by a vector field on a straight path can be negative. This occurs when the vector field and the displacement vector are in opposite directions, resulting in a negative dot product and a negative value for work.

How does the angle between the vector field and the displacement vector affect the work done on a straight path?

The angle between the vector field and the displacement vector affects the work done on a straight path through the dot product. When the angle is 0, the work is at its maximum value since the dot product is equal to the product of the magnitudes. When the angle is 90 degrees, the work is 0 since the dot product is 0.

Back
Top