Work Energy Theorem of a spring

In summary, the conversation discusses a question about the change in potential energy and initial speed of a disk on a slope. There are some concerns about the given information being inconsistent and potentially misleading for students.
  • #1
theBEAST
364
0

Homework Statement


ZHW8r.png

The Attempt at a Solution


h2Yg4.jpg


Is this correct? Is the change in potential energy Ufinal-Uinitial?

My answer turns out to be a positive number, so intuitively does this mean that some of the kinetic energy went into potential and thus the final potential energy is greater than the initial?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Looks fine, but several things bother me.
What is "kg = 0.5m"?
Why are you told the initial speed of the disk?
Seems to me that the disk does not have enough KE to travel two revolutions down the slope, and it won't recoil that far either. But I cannot think of another interpretation of the question.
 
  • #3
haruspex said:
Looks fine, but several things bother me.
What is "kg = 0.5m"?
Why are you told the initial speed of the disk?
Seems to me that the disk does not have enough KE to travel two revolutions down the slope, and it won't recoil that far either. But I cannot think of another interpretation of the question.

kg is the radius of gyration, it would be used to solve for the total KE which is the sum of the rotational and translational motion. This is given to throw the students off I think :P
 
  • #4
theBEAST said:
kg is the radius of gyration, it would be used to solve for the total KE which is the sum of the rotational and translational motion. This is given to throw the students off I think :P
OK, but that doesn't satisfy my last point. As far as I can see, the information given is inconsistent. It would not travel two whole revolutions, in either direction. (Would somebody check that?) Superfluous information is one thing, contradictory information quite another.
 
  • #5


Yes, that is correct. According to the Work-Energy Theorem, the change in potential energy (Ufinal-Uinitial) is equal to the work done on the spring, which is also equal to the change in kinetic energy. This means that some of the initial kinetic energy was converted into potential energy, resulting in a positive change in potential energy. This is often seen in the case of a spring, where compressing or stretching the spring stores potential energy that can be released as kinetic energy when the spring returns to its original position.
 

FAQ: Work Energy Theorem of a spring

What is the Work Energy Theorem of a spring?

The Work Energy Theorem of a spring states that the work done by an external force on a spring is equal to the change in the spring's potential energy.

How is the Work Energy Theorem of a spring derived?

The Work Energy Theorem of a spring can be derived from the laws of conservation of energy and Hooke's law, which states that the force exerted by a spring is directly proportional to its displacement from equilibrium.

What is the significance of the Work Energy Theorem of a spring?

The Work Energy Theorem of a spring is important because it allows us to calculate the work done on a spring and the resulting change in its potential energy, which is useful in understanding and predicting the behavior of springs in various systems and devices.

How is the Work Energy Theorem of a spring applied in real-life situations?

The Work Energy Theorem of a spring is used in many real-life situations, such as in the design of shock absorbers for vehicles, the construction of trampolines, and the operation of various types of machinery and equipment that utilize springs.

Are there any limitations to the Work Energy Theorem of a spring?

The Work Energy Theorem of a spring assumes that the spring is ideal and that there is no energy loss due to friction or other external factors. In real-life situations, these limitations may affect the accuracy of the calculations.

Back
Top