Work & Energy Transfer: Comparing Configurations

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of work and energy transfer in different configurations. The first configuration involves a ball moving down an inclined path, where the only force doing work is the gravitational force. The work is calculated as W=mgh. In the second configuration, the gravitational force is still doing work in the y axis, but the normal force is doing work in the x axis. The total work is equal to the work done by both forces. However, the vertical component of the normal force also does negative work. This means that the net work done by the normal force is zero.
  • #1
Perrin
14
0
Hello, I've been going over work and energy transfer for some upcoming tests, and I got the following question:

http://www.dotcore.co.il/conf1.gif

If I look at that configuration, the ball is moving down the inclined path in the same direction as the x axis, and there's no movement on the y axis, so the only force doing work is the gravitational force. The work being done I calculated as:
[tex]W=mg\cos{\Theta}\frac{h}{cos{\Theta}}[/tex]
Which I simplified as:
[tex]W=mgh[/tex]

Now, that tells me that the gravitational force is doing work on the ball equal to mgh.
If I setup a different configuration though:

http://www.dotcore.co.il/conf2.gif

Now, the gravitational force is doing work only in the y axis, equal to the work it did in the last setup, but the normal force is doing work on the x axis, equal to:
[tex]W=N\cos{\Theta}h\tan{\Theta}[/tex]
[tex]W=Nh\sin{\Theta}[/tex]

Now, does this mean that there is more work done in one setup than in the other? Did I make a mistake?
Thanks for the help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Perrin said:
Now, the gravitational force is doing work only in the y axis, equal to the work it did in the last setup, but the normal force is doing work on the x axis, equal to:
[tex]W=N\cos{\Theta}h\tan{\Theta}[/tex]
[tex]W=Nh\sin{\Theta}[/tex]

Now, does this mean that there is more work done in one setup than in the other? Did I make a mistake?
Don't forget the work done by the vertical component of normal force.

(Since the displacement is perpendicular to the normal force, you know that the net work done by the normal force must be zero, no matter how you define your coordinate system. :wink:)
 
  • #3
Ohhh, so that's what I forgot! It's doing negative work equal to Nhsin(theta).

Thanks for clarifying that! I think I got a better grip on this now
 

FAQ: Work & Energy Transfer: Comparing Configurations

What is work and energy transfer?

Work and energy transfer is the process of transferring energy from one system to another through the performance of work. This can occur through various mechanisms such as mechanical, electrical, thermal, or chemical processes.

How are work and energy related?

Work and energy are closely related concepts. Work is defined as the force applied to an object multiplied by the distance the object moves in the direction of the force. Energy is the ability to do work. Therefore, when work is done on an object, energy is transferred to that object.

What is the difference between potential and kinetic energy?

Potential energy is the energy an object possesses due to its position or configuration. It is stored energy that has the potential to do work. Kinetic energy, on the other hand, is the energy an object possesses due to its motion. It is the energy an object has while it is in motion.

How can different configurations affect the transfer of energy?

Different configurations can affect the transfer of energy by changing the amount of work that can be done. For example, a lever or pulley system can increase the amount of work that can be done with a given amount of force. Similarly, changing the angle or direction of the force can also affect the amount of work that can be done.

How can we compare the efficiency of different energy transfer configurations?

The efficiency of energy transfer configurations can be compared by calculating the ratio of the work done to the energy input. The higher the ratio, the more efficient the configuration is at transferring energy. However, it is important to note that different configurations may be more suitable for different tasks, so efficiency is not always the sole factor to consider.

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
15K
Replies
4
Views
573
Replies
3
Views
928
Back
Top