- #1
Neuraxiom
- 2
- 0
Hi everyone!
I'm currently a second year at UC Irvine. I'm working on majors in Computer Science and Engineering and Mathematics with a minor in Philosophy if time permits. I want to study Logic somewhere in the UC system or perhaps out of state if it seems worth it.
So I've been planning around a four year plan, mainly because I don't want to put myself further in debt but also because I feel that spreading out my classes to another year wouldn't provide enough of a challenge for me. Because of this, I take up to twice as many classes as my classmates do but I also tend to have a lower GPA.
I'm a pretty stubborn dude. I skipped my "Introduction to Proofs" class and went straight into four upper division math classes the first quarter of my sophomore year. I didn't do so well but I kept pushing on and my grades are improving slowly but surely. I am one of the youngest in my classes, and I will be going into an introductory graduate class next quarter.
At the rate things are going, I'll have a 3.2 overall and math GPA by the beginning of my third year, and it's still possible for me to meet UCLA's minimum requirement of a 3.5 Math GPA by the time I apply.
Other admission factors aside, am I relying too much on my workload to make up for my GPA? Math divisions probably care more about the ability to understand and focus on material than to be able to tackle a broad range of subjects, but I know nothing about graduate admissions. Also, how much does improvement matter? Being able to show improvement in GPA seemed to matter a lot in undergraduate admissions. Should I expect the same thing now?
I know this is probably not the best place to ask these questions, but I figured I'd give it a shot. Any feedback is welcome. Thanks guys. :)
I'm currently a second year at UC Irvine. I'm working on majors in Computer Science and Engineering and Mathematics with a minor in Philosophy if time permits. I want to study Logic somewhere in the UC system or perhaps out of state if it seems worth it.
So I've been planning around a four year plan, mainly because I don't want to put myself further in debt but also because I feel that spreading out my classes to another year wouldn't provide enough of a challenge for me. Because of this, I take up to twice as many classes as my classmates do but I also tend to have a lower GPA.
I'm a pretty stubborn dude. I skipped my "Introduction to Proofs" class and went straight into four upper division math classes the first quarter of my sophomore year. I didn't do so well but I kept pushing on and my grades are improving slowly but surely. I am one of the youngest in my classes, and I will be going into an introductory graduate class next quarter.
At the rate things are going, I'll have a 3.2 overall and math GPA by the beginning of my third year, and it's still possible for me to meet UCLA's minimum requirement of a 3.5 Math GPA by the time I apply.
Other admission factors aside, am I relying too much on my workload to make up for my GPA? Math divisions probably care more about the ability to understand and focus on material than to be able to tackle a broad range of subjects, but I know nothing about graduate admissions. Also, how much does improvement matter? Being able to show improvement in GPA seemed to matter a lot in undergraduate admissions. Should I expect the same thing now?
I know this is probably not the best place to ask these questions, but I figured I'd give it a shot. Any feedback is welcome. Thanks guys. :)