Would it be true if I said that the image of x is contained in f(X)?

  • Thread starter amanda_ou812
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Image
In summary, the statement is asking to prove that a function f is continuous at a point p-0 if and only if for every epsilon > 0, there exists a delta > 0 such that the image of a neighborhood around p-0 is contained within a neighborhood around f(p-0). To prove this, we need to show that the image of x, defined as the set of all y such that y = f(x) for all x in X, is contained within f(x). This can be done by showing that for every epsilon > 0, there exists a delta > 0 such that the image of a neighborhood around p-0 is contained within a neighborhood around f(p-0). We can also reverse this
  • #1
amanda_ou812
48
1

Homework Statement



Let (X,d) and (Y, p) be metric spaces and f : X -> Y a function. Prove that f is continuous at p-0 if and only if for every ε > 0, there exists a δ > 0 so that the image of Bd(p-0; δ) is contained in Bp( f (p-0);ε).

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


For the forward implication, I feel like I am almost there.

The statement f is continuous at p-0 implies for every e>0 there is a delta>0 so that when d(p, p-0)< delta this implies p( f(p), f(p-0))<e. But d(p, p-0)< delta implies x is contained in B (sub d) (p-0; delta) and p( f(p), f(p-0))<e implies f(p) is contained in B (sub p) (f(p-0); e).

Here is where I would like to say that notice that the image of x is contained in f(x). Then I can conclude that the image of B (sub d) is contained in B (sub p)

Then, I was going to reverse it for the other implication.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
For any set X, the "image of x" is defined as the set of all y such that y= f(x) for all x in X. Normally, we use the notation f(X) to mean the "image of x". So the image of x is not just "contained in" fix), it is f(x).
 

FAQ: Would it be true if I said that the image of x is contained in f(X)?

What does the statement "image of x is contained in f(X)" mean?

The statement "image of x is contained in f(X)" means that every element in the set containing x also has a corresponding image in f(X). In other words, for every value of x, there is a corresponding value in f(X) that represents it.

What is the difference between the image of x and f(X)?

The image of x refers to the specific values of x that are represented in f(X), while f(X) is the entire set of values that x can be mapped to. In other words, the image of x is a subset of f(X).

Is it possible for the image of x to be contained in f(X) if x is not in the domain of f?

No, it is not possible for the image of x to be contained in f(X) if x is not in the domain of f. In order for an element to have an image in f(X), it must first be a part of the domain of f.

What does it mean if the image of x is not contained in f(X)?

If the image of x is not contained in f(X), it means that there are values of x that do not have corresponding images in f(X). This could be due to x being outside of the domain of f or the function f not being able to map x to a value in its range.

How can I determine if the image of x is contained in f(X)?

To determine if the image of x is contained in f(X), you can check if every element in the set containing x also has a corresponding image in f(X). You can also check if all values of x in the domain of f have corresponding images in f(X).

Back
Top