Would one be pushing as much as their weight?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of pushing weight in relation to a chest press machine and a chair lift. It highlights that while the work done may be equivalent, the effective weight being pressed can differ based on the distance ratio between the two movements. A mechanical advantage allows for a lower force over a longer distance, maintaining the equality of input and output work. The conversation emphasizes understanding how these principles apply to exercise equipment. Overall, the relationship between distance and weight is crucial in determining the effectiveness of the workout.
biomajor
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
In the following video, there is a machine. https://youtu.be/a_CGlAnxO5c It looks like a chest press machine but doesn't have weights attached - only attached to the chair. Would one be lifting as much as they weigh?
Relevant Equations
I was thinking it might have something to do with W = F•d
Because one is effectively pushing in the same way as a chest press machine, wouldn't the work done be the same?

1700758031609.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Yes, it does look like how you describe it. The only caveat would be the ratio between the chest press distance and the chair lift distance. I couldn't tell if it was 1:1 or maybe more like 2:1. The work will still be the same, but you would only be pressing half of your weight in the latter case.
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to PF.

Yes, it does look like how you describe it. The only caveat would be the ratio between the chest press distance and the chair lift distance. I couldn't tell if it was 1:1 or maybe more like 2:1. The work will still be the same, but you would only be pressing half of your weight in the latter case.

Hello! Thank you for the warm welcome!
If it is not too much trouble, may I ask how the ratio would change the weight but not the work? I imagined it as a pulley system so the weight would be the same but the work done would change because of differing distances? Is this an incorrect way to look at it?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top