MHB Write ⊆ or ⊄ in the space provided.

  • Thread starter Thread starter KOO
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining whether to use the subset symbol (⊆) or the not a subset symbol (⊄) in various mathematical expressions. The first two expressions are confirmed to be correct, while clarification is provided on the third expression involving the power set of the empty set. The fourth expression compares Cartesian products of natural and integer numbers, with a consensus that the left side contains distinct elements not found on the right. Overall, the participants engage in correcting and confirming the appropriate symbols for the given mathematical relationships.
KOO
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Write ⊆ or in the space provided.

(3,5) _____ [3,5]
[-1,4] ____ (-1,4)
{∅} _____ P(∅)
N * Z ____ Z * NMy Solution)




 
Physics news on Phys.org
KOO said:
Write ⊆ or in the space provided.

(3,5) _____ [3,5]
[-1,4] ____ (-1,4)
{∅} _____ P(∅)
N * Z ____ Z * NMy Solution)





Hi KOO! :)

The first 2 are correct.

Edit: see Evgeny.Makarov's post for the 3rd.

As for the 4th, can I assume you intended $\mathbb N \times \mathbb Z \underline{\qquad} \mathbb Z \times \mathbb N$?
If so then the left hand side has elements like (1,1) and (1,-1), while the right hand side has elements like (-1,1) and (1,1)...
 
I assume the first two questions are about intervals on the real line. Then I agree.

KOO said:
{∅} _____ P(∅)
Note that P(∅) = {∅}.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
Note that P(∅) = {∅}.

Good point.
Slipped on that one.
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...

Similar threads

Back
Top