Wrong Time Dilation: Why Observers Disagree

In summary, the conversation discusses two observers measuring the speed of light from different reference frames and how their measurements differ. It also introduces the concept of length contraction and the importance of using synchronized timing devices and reflectors to accurately measure the speed of light. The final equations derived by the outside observer demonstrate the Lorentz transformation for time dilation.
  • #1
stanley.st
31
0
Hello !

Can you tell me what's wrong? I suppose two observers. They measure speed of light. One observer is in rocket of length L. Observer in rocket measured speed
[tex]C'=\frac{L}{t'}[/tex]
and t' is time from observer's view. Second observer is outside. He measured
[tex]C=\frac{L+vt}{t}[/tex]
where v is speed of rocket. As C' = C, we have
[tex]\frac{L+vt}{t}=\frac{L}{t'}\quad\Rightarrow\quad t'=\frac{t}{1+\frac{vt}{L}}=\quad\Rightarrow\quad t'=\frac{t}{1+\frac{v}{c}}[/tex]
But this is not
[tex]t' = \frac{t}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}[/tex]
known from theory. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The first problem I see is that you forgot about length contaction.
 
  • #3
So all bad?
 
  • #4
This is very confusing. Are the two observers each measuring the speed of light independently of each other or is the outside observer watching the rocket observer measure the speed of light and not actually making his own measurement?

In order to measure the speed of light, you have to have a timing device located at the source of the light and a reflector a measured distance away. You then time how long it takes for the light to leave the source, bounce off the reflector and come back to the timing device. You calculate the average speed as twice the distance divided by the time interval.

Each observer needs his own timing device and his own reflector, although if they happen to be colocated when the light flash occurs, they can use a common light source.

I don't see anything like that in your equations.
 
  • #5
Yes, L is not the same as L'. The easier way to derive this is from the metric (proper time):

[tex]d\tau^2 = dt^2 - \frac{1}{c^2} \left( dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 \right) [/tex]
[tex]\frac{d\tau^2}{dt^2} = 1 - \frac{1}{c^2} \left( \frac{dx^2}{dt^2} + \frac{dy^2}{dt^2} + \frac{dz^2}{dt^2} \right) [/tex]
[tex]\frac{d\tau^2}{dt^2} = 1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2} [/tex]
[tex]\frac{d\tau}{dt} = \sqrt{ 1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2} } [/tex]
 
  • #6
ghwellsjr said:
This is very confusing. Are the two observers each measuring the speed of light independently of each other or is the outside observer watching the rocket observer measure the speed of light and not actually making his own measurement?

In order to measure the speed of light, you have to have a timing device located at the source of the light and a reflector a measured distance away. You then time how long it takes for the light to leave the source, bounce off the reflector and come back to the timing device. You calculate the average speed as twice the distance divided by the time interval.

Each observer needs his own timing device and his own reflector, although if they happen to be colocated when the light flash occurs, they can use a common light source.

I don't see anything like that in your equations.

They are using there own timing devices. The time measured by the observer on the rocket using his own clock is t' and the time measured by the outside observer using his own clock is t The reflector is not required. Each observer uses two clocks that are synchronised in their own rest frame. In the rest frame of the rocket the light simply moves the length of the rocket (L) in time (t'). In the rest frame of the outside observer, the light moves the length contracted length of the rocket L*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) plus the distance the front of the rocket moves in the time it takes for the light to get from the back of the rocket to the front (v*t).
 
Last edited:
  • #7
stanley.st said:
Hello !

Can you tell me what's wrong? I suppose two observers. They measure speed of light. One observer is in rocket of length L. Observer in rocket measured speed
[tex]C'=\frac{L}{t'}[/tex]
and t' is time from observer's view. Second observer is outside. He measured
[tex]C=\frac{L+vt}{t}[/tex]
where v is speed of rocket. As C' = C, we have
[tex]\frac{L+vt}{t}=\frac{L}{t'}\quad\Rightarrow\quad t'=\frac{t}{1+\frac{vt}{L}}=\quad\Rightarrow\quad t'=\frac{t}{1+\frac{v}{c}}[/tex]
But this is not
[tex]t' = \frac{t}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}[/tex]
known from theory. Thanks.

O.K. I have figured out how to do it.

Observer in rocket measured speed
[tex]C'=\frac{L}{t'}[/tex]
Second observer is outside. He measured
[tex]C=\frac{L\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}+vt}{t}[/tex]
Now the total distance (x) traveled by the light particle according to the outside observer is

[tex]x = L\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2} + vt \quad\Rightarrow\quad L = \frac{(x-vt)}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}[/tex]
so we can write:

[tex]C=\frac{x}{t} [/tex]
and since C' = C

[tex]\frac{x}{t} = \frac{L}{t'} \quad\Rightarrow\quad t' = \frac{t}{x} L = \frac{t}{x} \frac{(x-vt)}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} = \frac{t(1-vt/x)}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} [/tex]

Now x/t = c and t = x/c (in this case as we are measuring the speed of a light particle) so:

[tex]t' = \frac{t(1-vt/x)}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} = \frac{t(1-v/c)}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} = \frac{t-vt/c}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} = \frac{t-vx/c^2}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} [/tex]
Which is the result we are looking for as this is the Lorentz transformation for time. See http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/ltrans.html#c2

Simples :-p

P.S. In this case the initial event is at the origin and the final event is at x in the outside frame so the more complicated transform is required. If both events are at the same location (eg a clock that remains at the origin of the outside frame) then x=0 and the equation simplifies to the more familiar time dilation equation:

[tex] t' = \frac{t}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} [/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #8
yuiop said:
They are using there own timing devices. The time measured by the observer on the rocket using his own clock is t' and the time measured by the outside observer using his own clock is t The reflector is not required. Each observer uses two clocks that are synchronised in their own rest frame. In the rest frame of the rocket the light simply moves the length of the rocket (L) in time (t'). In the rest frame of the outside observer, the light moves the length contracted length of the rocket L*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) plus the distance the front of the rocket moves in the time it takes for the light to get from the back of the rocket to the front (v*t).
If they don't each use a single timing device and their own reflector, then they are not measuring the speed of light. Instead, they are relying on previous definitions of what a Reference Frame is in Special Relativity and what the speed of light is going between two points.

I'm sure you are providing the answer that stanley.st is looking for but I'm just pointing out that it doesn't have anything to do with measuring the speed of light as he stated in his original post.
 
  • #9
Thanks for help so much to all. But any of these replies didn't satisfied me, but now I

solved my problem.

To yuiop: The problem is, what the hell is L\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2} :-) Of course, I

know what is it, but we didn't derive it here.

To PAllen: This was that obstacle :-) I really forgot a length contraction. Let me rewrite
[tex]C=\frac{\varphi(L)}{\psi(t)}[/tex]
be a general measurement of rocket observer (using some transformation). Then
[tex]\frac{\varphi(L)}{\psi(t)}=v+\frac{L}{t}[/tex]
from my previous notes. So that
[tex]\psi(t)=\frac{\varphi(L)}{v+\frac{L}{t}}=\frac{t}{\frac{vt+L}{\varphi(L)}}[/tex]
The same equation must hold for reverse situation. From Rocket observer's view the other

observer is moving opposite velocity. So that
[tex]t=\frac{\psi(t)}{\frac{L-vt}{\varphi(L)}}[/tex]
And combining last two equations we have
[tex]t\frac{L-vt}{\varphi(L)}=\frac{t}{\frac{vt+L}{\varphi(L)}} \Rightarrow L^2-v^2t^2=\varphi^2(L)[/tex]
In this way, I have found a function phi
[tex]\varphi (L)=L\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2t^2}{L^2}}=L\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{C^2}}[/tex]
Next steps will be the same as yuiop's.
 
  • #10
stanley.st said:
In this way, I have found a function phi

Hi Stanley. I am not totally sure all your equations add up. In your first post you stated:

I suppose two observers. They measure speed of light. One observer is in rocket of length L. Observer in rocket measured speed
[tex]C'=\frac{L}{t'}[/tex]
and t' is time from observer's view. Second observer is outside. He measured
[tex]C=\frac{L+vt}{t}[/tex]
where v is speed of rocket. As C' = C, we have
[tex]\frac{L+vt}{t}=\frac{L}{t'}\quad\Rightarrow\quad t'=\frac{t}{1+\frac{vt}{L}}=\quad\Rightarrow\quad t'=\frac{t}{1+\frac{v}{c}}[/tex]
In the last step of the above quoted text you have substituted c for L/t but if you look at the steps above you have defined c as L/t' or (L+vt)/t and not as L/t so that is an incorrect substitution. (I am ignoring the fact that length contraction has been left out as you are already aware of that.)

In your second derivation you attempt to derive the length contraction factor but I am not sure all your steps are sound:

stanley.st said:
[tex]C=\frac{\varphi(L)}{\psi(t)}[/tex]
be a general measurement of rocket observer (using some transformation).
Who is the "rocket observer"? Before you had an observer in the rocket and an observer outside the rocket. Is the rocket observer inside the rocket or observing the rocket from the outside? I will assume you mean the outside observer because you used C and not C' and I am assuming you are being consistent with your first post. Now you have defined the speed of light as the distance light travels in the outside frame as a function of the proper length L ([itex]\varphi(L)[/itex]) in a given time as measured by the outside observer as a function of t ([itex]\psi(t)[/itex]). Why would you have a function of t or did you mean as a function of the proper time t' as measured by the observer in the rocket?

stanley.st said:
Then
[tex]\frac{\varphi(L)}{\psi(t)}=v+\frac{L}{t}[/tex]
from my previous notes.

Here you have effectively defined:

[tex]C = v+\frac{L}{t}[/tex]

because you previously defined:

[tex]C = \frac{\varphi(L)}{\psi(t)} [/tex]

This is a mistake because:

[tex]C /ne v+\frac{L}{t}[/tex]

stanley.st said:
So that
[tex]\psi(t)=\frac{\varphi(L)}{v+\frac{L}{t}}=\frac{t}{\frac{vt+L}{\varphi(L)}}[/tex]
This bit is O.K> in that it is at least consistent with your previous statements and algebraically correct.
stanley.st said:
The same equation must hold for reverse situation. From Rocket observer's view the other observer is moving opposite velocity. So that
[tex]t=\frac{\psi(t)}{\frac{L-vt}{\varphi(L)}}[/tex]
This is simply wrong.

Rearrange this equation you gave earlier:
[tex]\psi(t)=\frac{t}{\frac{vt+L}{\varphi(L)}}[/tex]

and you get:

[tex]t=\frac{\psi(t)}{\frac{L+vt}{\varphi(L)}}[/tex]

and not what you got. You argument that the sign of v is reversed because you are looking from the point of view of the other observer does not hold water.

t either has the value

[tex]t=\frac{\psi(t)}{\frac{L+vt}{\varphi(L)}}[/tex]

or

[tex]t=\frac{\psi(t)}{\frac{L-vt}{\varphi(L)}}[/tex]

but it cannot be both. Did you intend the proper time t' as measured by the observer in the rocket? You seem to be getting your reference frames mixed up.

Note that if we take the Lorentz transformation:

[tex]t' = \frac{t-\frac{vx}{c^2}}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} [/tex]

and obtain the inverse transformation;

[tex]t' = \frac{t'+\frac{vx'}{c^2}}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} [/tex]

that there is more to it than a simple reversal of the sign of v. T becomes t' and x becomes x'.

stanley.st said:
And combining last two equations we have
[tex]t\frac{L-vt}{\varphi(L)}=\frac{t}{\frac{vt+L}{\varphi(L)}} \Rightarrow L^2-v^2t^2=\varphi^2(L)[/tex]
The algebra in that bit is OK.

stanley.st said:
In this way, I have found a function phi
[tex]\varphi (L)=L\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2t^2}{L^2}}=L\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{C^2}}[/tex]
Again you have made a flawed substitution. C is not equal to L/t.

Sort it out!

P.S. You asked where does L*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) appear from in my derivation. Of course you know it the length contracted value of L, but the length contraction factor was not derived by me but was simply what the outside observer would measure the length of the moving rocket to be if he actually made the measurement. You seem to be implying that if the outside observer makes no actual measurements and without any knowledge of SR he can work out the Lorentz transformations from just the information that the observer on the rocket measures the speed of light to be L/t'. I do not think it is that simple.
 

FAQ: Wrong Time Dilation: Why Observers Disagree

What is time dilation?

Time dilation is a phenomenon in which time appears to move at different rates for observers in different frames of reference. This is a consequence of Einstein's theory of relativity, which states that time and space are not absolute and can be affected by factors such as gravity and velocity.

How does time dilation cause observers to disagree?

Observers can disagree on the passage of time because their frames of reference are different. This means that their perception of time can be affected by factors such as their relative velocity and the strength of gravity in their respective locations. As a result, they may experience time at different rates, leading to a disagreement on the actual duration of an event.

Can time dilation be observed in everyday life?

Yes, time dilation can be observed in everyday life, although the effects are usually very small. For example, GPS satellites have to account for time dilation due to their high speeds in orbit around the Earth, otherwise they would not be able to accurately determine their location. Additionally, astronauts who spend extended periods of time in space experience time dilation compared to those on Earth.

How is time dilation calculated?

Time dilation can be calculated using the equation t' = t / √(1 - v^2/c^2), where t' is the perceived time, t is the actual time, v is the relative velocity, and c is the speed of light. This equation takes into account the effects of velocity on time dilation. For gravitational time dilation, the equation is t' = t / √(1 - 2GM/rc^2), where G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the object causing the gravitational field, r is the distance from the object, and c is the speed of light.

How does time dilation affect our understanding of the universe?

Time dilation is an important concept in understanding the universe because it helps us to reconcile discrepancies in time between different observers. It also plays a crucial role in theories such as the Big Bang and the expansion of the universe. Time dilation allows us to better understand the effects of gravity and high speeds on time, and how these factors shape our understanding of the universe.

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
525
Replies
11
Views
940
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Back
Top