MHB Yes, $\cos \alpha x$ can be considered a $2\pi-$periodic function.

Markov2
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
1) Find the Fourier series of the $2\pi-$periodic function defined by $f(x)=2x,\,-\pi\le x<\pi.$

2) Use the Fourier series of $f(x)=\cos \alpha x,$ with $0\ne\alpha\in\mathbb R$ to show that $\displaystyle\cot \alpha \pi = \frac{1}{\pi }\left( {\frac{1}{\alpha } - \sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {\frac{{2\alpha }}{{{n^2} - {\alpha ^2}}}} } \right).$

Attempts:

1) I have $a_n=\displaystyle\frac1\pi\int_{-\pi}^\pi 2x \cos (nx)\,dx$ and $b_n=\displaystyle\frac1\pi\int_{-\pi}^\pi 2x \sin (nx)\,dx,$ and $a_0=\displaystyle\frac1\pi\int_{-\pi}^\pi 2x\,dx,$ so the Fourier series is $\displaystyle\frac{{{a_0}}}{2} + \sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {\left( {{a_n}\cos (nx) + {b_n}\sin (nx)} \right)} .$ Is this correct?

2) Do I use the standard period for $\cos\alpha x$ ? I mean $-\pi\le x<\pi$ then calculate the series as did in (1)? However I don't see how to prove the identity.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For (2), yes do a Fourier series expansion for $\cos \alpha x$ then set $x = \pi$. See how that goes.
 
Okay I can do that, but I don't see how to prove the identity though.
How about (1)? Is it correct?
 
Yes, (1) looks good. Post your result for the Fourier series for $\cos \alpha x$ so we can get to the result.
 
But do I consider $\cos\alpha x$ a $2\pi-$periodic function right?
 
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...

Similar threads

Back
Top