MHB Zhina's question at Yahoo Answers regarding optimization subject to constraint

AI Thread Summary
Zhina's question involves optimizing the volume of a box formed by cutting a 24-foot wire into 12 pieces to create a rectangular frame, with the base length being twice the width. The problem is approached using both Lagrange multipliers and single-variable calculus, leading to the conclusion that the maximum volume is achieved when the width is 4/3 feet. The dimensions of the box for maximum volume are calculated as 8/3 feet in length, 4/3 feet in width, and 2 feet in height. The maximum volume is determined to be 64/9 cubic feet. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately interpreting constraints in optimization problems.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

CALCULUS needHELP WITH THIS PLEASE! APPRECIAT EIT -?

please DON'T GO AWAY WHEN YOU SEE THIS! HELP NEEDED THANKS

a 24 foot wire is cut into 12 pieces which are welded together to form a rectangular frame whose base is twice as long than it is wide .
the frame is than covered with paper to form a box . find the volume of the largest possible box that can be made this way

Please help with this thanks in advance so much

Here is a link to the question:

CALCULUS needHELP WITH THIS PLEASE! APPRECIAT EIT -? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Zhina,

Let's let the dimensions of the box be $x,y,z$ (all positive) where the volume (the objective function) is:

$$V(x,y,z)=xyz$$

Each dimension will require 4 pieces of wire, so we have the constraint:

$$4x+4y+4z=4L$$ (where $4L$ is the total length of the wire)

$$g(x,y,z)=x+y+z-L=0$$

We also have the constraint (if we choose $y$ to be the length, and $x$ to be the width)

$$h(x,y,z)=y-2x=0$$

Using Lagrange multipliers, we obtain the system:

$$yz=\lambda-2\mu$$

$$xz=\lambda+\mu$$

$$xy=\lambda$$

which implies:

$$\lambda=yz+2\mu=xz-\mu=xy$$

From:

$$yz+2\mu=xz-\mu$$

we obtain:

$$\mu=\frac{xz-yz}{3}$$

Now we also have:

$$xz-\mu=xy$$

$$\mu=xz-xy$$

and hence, we find:

$$\frac{xz-yz}{3}=xz-xy$$

$$xz-yz=3xz-3xy$$

$$-yz=2xz-3xy$$

$$x=\frac{yz}{3y-2z}$$

Substituting for $x$ into the second constraint, we find:

$$y=\frac{2yz}{3y-2z}$$

Since $y\ne0$, we may divide through by $y$ to obtain:

$$y=\frac{4z}{3}$$

Substituting for $y$ into the formula for $x$, we obtain:

$$x=\frac{\left(\frac{4z}{3} \right)z}{3\left(\frac{4z}{3} \right)-2z}=\frac{2z}{3}$$

Now, substituting for $x$ and $y$ into the first constraint, we obtain:

$$\frac{2z}{3}+\frac{4z}{3}+z=L$$

$$z=\frac{L}{3},\,y=\frac{4L}{9},\,x=\frac{2L}{9}$$

We know this is a maximum, as the other critical point is $$\left(0,0,4L \right)$$ giving:

$$V_{\min}=0\text{ ft}^3$$

Thus, we find:

$$V_{\max}=V\left(\frac{2L}{9},\frac{4L}{9},\frac{L}{3} \right)=3\left(\frac{2L}{9} \right)^3$$

Plugging in the given $$L=6\text{ ft}$$, we find:

$$V_{\max}=3\left(\frac{2(6\text{ ft})}{9} \right)^3=\frac{64}{9}\,\text{ ft}^3$$

To Zhina and any other guests viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other optimization questions in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f10/ forum.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 
Last edited:
This can actually be solved using single variable calculus. We know that the twelve pieces form the edges of a box, and we also know that we are making these pieces from a 24ft long wire. If we call the length "l", the width "w" and the height "h", then we have

[math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} 4l + 4w + 4h &= 24 \end{align*}[/math]

We are also told that the length is twice the width, so [math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} l = 2w \end{align*}[/math], and from there we can see that

[math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} 4 \left( 2w \right) + 4w + 4h &= 24 \\ 12w + 4h &= 24 \\ 4h &= 24 - 12w \\ h &= 6 - 3w \end{align*}[/math]

The volume of the box can be found using

[math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} V &= lwh \\ &= 2w \left( w \right) \left( 6 - 3w \right) \\ &= 12w^2 - 6w^3 \end{align*}[/math]

The maximum volume is where the derivative is 0, so

[math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{dV}{dw} &= 24w - 18w^2 \\ 0 &= 24w - 18w^2 \\ 0 &= 6w \left( 4 - 3w \right) \\ w = 0 \textrm{ or } w &= \frac{4}{3} \end{align*}[/math]

Clearly when w = 0, the volume will be 0, so the maximum volume has to be when [math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} w = \frac{4}{3} \end{align*}[/math]. To check that it's a maximum, we can check the value of the derivative on either side of the point (say at w = 1 and w = 2). So

[math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{dV}{dw} | _{w = 1} &= 6 \\ \\ \frac{dV}{dw} | _{w = 2} &= -24 \end{align*}[/math]

Since the gradients go from positive to 0 to negative, the criticial point is a maximum.

[math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} V &= 12 \left( \frac{4}{3} \right) ^2 - 6 \left( \frac{4}{3} \right) ^3 \\ &= 12 \left( \frac{16}{9} \right) - 6 \left( \frac{64}{27} \right) \\ &= \frac{64}{3} - \frac{128}{9} \\ &= \frac{64}{9} \end{align*}[/math]

Therefore the maximum volume is [math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{64}{9} \,\textrm{ft}\,^3 \end{align*}[/math], when the box has dimensions [math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{8}{3} \,\textrm{ft} \, \times \frac{4}{3} \,\textrm{ft} \, \times 2\,\textrm{ft} \end{align*}[/math].
 
Last edited:
Sorry Mark, it appears you've forgotten that the OP stated the length is twice as long as the width :)
 
Prove It said:
Sorry Mark, it appears you've forgotten that the OP stated the length is twice as long as the width :)

Yes, thanks to your post, I realized I did not read the problem carefully enough, and I have edited my post to reflect the second constraint. I would not have used Lagrange multipliers if I had done so. :D
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top