- #36
atyy
Science Advisor
- 15,168
- 3,378
TrickyDicky said:I 'm not seeing this. Gleason's theorem assumes non-contextuality, which is a strong assumption, hard to reconcile with the practice of QM and a reality that appears to be contextual, But my point is that interpretations like say Bohmian, or even some Copenhagen flavors include contextuality, how is Gleason's non-contextuality assumption compatible with that?
In BM, the Copenhagn interpretation is emergent, so BM is consistent with Copenhagen.