- #1,401
DevilsAvocado
Gold Member
- 848
- 91
zonde said:So if we hypothetically detect all photons even those with miserable detection probability we loose any idea about interference pattern.
That's what I call unfair sampling but you can call it whatever way you want.
...
Are we still on the same line here?
I’m afraid we don’t even agree on "what’s a line"... as I said, it’s extremely simple. If we block one of the slits, we will not get the interference pattern, with or without "unfair sampling". This is an undeniable fact that should make sense even to a 10-yearold.
The physical proofs are right in front of you nose, where you step by step can see with your own eyes what happens when the "sampling increases":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
<object width="640" height="505">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FCoiyhC30bc&fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0&color1=0x402061&color2=0x9461ca"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param>
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FCoiyhC30bc&fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0&color1=0x402061&color2=0x9461ca" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="505"></embed>
</object>
Last edited by a moderator: