Bojowald 3 week gig at KITP quantum NONsingularities

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
Click For Summary
The upcoming mini-program at KITP, organized by Martin Bojowald and Gary Horowitz, will focus on the quantum nature of spacetime singularities from January 8 to January 26, 2007. It aims to bridge advancements in string theory and loop quantum gravity, particularly regarding phenomena near the big bang and inside black holes. Bojowald's work on singularity-free quantum cosmology is gaining recognition, supported by his contributions to the Living Reviews and the Elsevier Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics. The discussions will also explore the implications of crossing singularities, including the potential emergence of naked singularities. This event promises to enhance understanding of fundamental issues in quantum gravity.
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
795
Francesca flagged this January 2007 event

francesca said:
I look forward for next January! Bojowald and Horowitz are organizing in Santa Barbara a mini-program lasting 3 weeks in http://www.kitp.ucsb.edu/activities/auto2/?id=332" :-p
We will see...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
http://www.kitp.ucsb.edu/activities/auto2/?id=332

------quote-----
The Quantum Nature of Spacetime Singularities

(Martin Bojowald, Robert H. Brandenberger, Gary T. Horowitz, Hong Liu)

Jan 8, 2007 - Jan 26, 2007



One of the main goals of quantum gravity is to provide a better understanding of physics near the big bang and inside black holes where general relativity breaks down. Recently, there has been considerable progress toward this goal in both of the main approaches to quantum gravity. In string theory, this includes string gas cosmology, tachyon condensation, and holographic descriptions using the AdS/CFT correspondence. In loop quantum gravity, space is fundamentally discrete, and evolution in symmetric cosmological models is nonsingular. This three week miniprogram will combine experts in both areas and on the classical approach to singularities to make further progress on this fundamental problem.

------endquote-------

Francesca's post
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=976175#post976175
was #17 in this thread
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=119156
 
Bojowald has also been invited to give a week of lectures in September at the Brazil School of Cosmology and Gravitation
http://www.cbpf.br/~cosmogra/bscgxxii.htm

His singularity-free version of quantum cosmology is getting to look
kind of standard. Thanks to Christine for this news!

Probably his authorship of the Living Reviews article helped solidify that
and then his writing the Elsevier Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics
article on Quantum Cosmology
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0603110

When you write the encyclopedia article on Quantum Cosmology that sort of makes it official that your version is the standard benchmark.

Living Reviews has a similar feel
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0601085
That one was specifically on LOOP quantum cosmology.
 
Last edited:
I wonder how they are triying to interpretate two oof the most relvants, IMHO consecuences of the yet made analisys.

Concretely the change of orientation of the 3 space when the singularity is crossed. In fact all the physics interpretation of evolution throught the singularity is a chalenge.

For example it seemengly opens the issue of aparence of naked singularitys. If so, where do they appear?
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K