In physical cosmology and astronomy, dark energy is an unknown form of energy that affects the universe on the largest scales. The first observational evidence for its existence came from measurements of supernovae, which showed that the universe does not expand at a constant rate; rather, the expansion of the universe is accelerating. Understanding the evolution of the universe requires knowledge of its starting conditions and its composition. Prior to these observations, it was thought that all forms of matter and energy in the universe would only cause the expansion to slow down over time. Measurements of the cosmic microwave background suggest the universe began in a hot Big Bang, from which general relativity explains its evolution and the subsequent large-scale motion. Without introducing a new form of energy, there was no way to explain how an accelerating universe could be measured. Since the 1990s, dark energy has been the most accepted premise to account for the accelerated expansion. As of 2021, there are active areas of cosmology research aimed at understanding the fundamental nature of dark energy.Assuming that the lambda-CDM model of cosmology is correct, the best current measurements indicate that dark energy contributes 68% of the total energy in the present-day observable universe. The mass–energy of dark matter and ordinary (baryonic) matter contributes 26% and 5%, respectively, and other components such as neutrinos and photons contribute a very small amount. The density of dark energy is very low (~ 7 × 10−30 g/cm3), much less than the density of ordinary matter or dark matter within galaxies. However, it dominates the mass–energy of the universe because it is uniform across space.Two proposed forms of dark energy are the cosmological constant, representing a constant energy density filling space homogeneously, and scalar fields such as quintessence or moduli, dynamic quantities having energy densities that can vary in time and space. Contributions from scalar fields that are constant in space are usually also included in the cosmological constant. The cosmological constant can be formulated to be equivalent to the zero-point radiation of space i.e. the vacuum energy. Scalar fields that change in space can be difficult to distinguish from a cosmological constant because the change may be extremely slow.
Due to the toy model nature of concordance cosmology, some experts believe that a more accurate general relativistic treatment of the structures that exist on all scales in the real universe may do away with the need to invoke dark energy. Inhomogeneous cosmologies, which attempt to account for the back-reaction of structure formation on the metric, generally do not acknowledge any dark energy contribution to the energy density of the Universe.
Google scholar has 651,000 results for dark matter and 521,000 results for
dark energy, more than i could read in a life time, can anyone suggest the
hot pappers on these subjects.
It is good practice to calculate the dark energy density. I remember doing it a few years back and later posting the result here at PF.
As I recall it was about 0.6 joule per cubic kilometer----so if you were being not overly finicky and giving a rough approx, it was about HALF a joule per...
Following close on the heels of new study shows Dark Matter isn't needed? Relativty explains it? we have Back-Reaction: A Cosmological Panacea which does for Dark Energy what General Relativity Resolves Galactic Rotation Without Exotic Dark Matter tries to do for Dark Matter.
It now seems...
Detailed observations of distant Type 1a supernovae, by two independent teams, are what got astrophysicists and cosmologists salivating about 'dark energy' (and the many possible physical processes that could give rise to it).
Systematic effects (including mis-identification) are, of course...
I am writing a 2nd year essay for my Physics degree, and have chosen dark energy as my topic. I've been reading papers and material for around a week now, and would like some reassurance that I am heading in the right direction and have made no major blunders or omissions. Here's the general...
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0504416
Authors: Mustapha Ishak (Princeton University)
Comments: 10 pages, 5 figures
Associated with the cosmic acceleration are the old and new cosmological constant problems, recently put into the more general context of the dark energy problem. In...
MOND is a theory the modifies the theory of gravity in weak fields which predicts, from luminous matter observations only, most of the galactic dynamics which motivated dark matter theory. It was developed by an Israeli scientist by the name of Milgrom in 1983.
TeVeS is a relativistic...
Hello Marcus, selfAdjoint, nightcleaner, Chronos, setAI and others
I think the following speaks for itself
Viable exact model universe without dark energy from primordial inflation
David L. Wiltshire
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0503099
Regards
Kea :wink:
Brian Greene in "The Fabric of the Cosmos" gives the above three as indirect, universal fields in which we exist but have not yet directly detected. Could they be mathematically interlinked among themselves or with immediately observable phenomena?
"RE: Hubble's law is WHAT is driving the
expansion: the not so recent Findings (last 10-5 yrs)
is that
experimentally it looks like there is a dark energy
component."
Question:
At what point does Hubble's Law begin to suggest this
dark energy component?
Suzanne Elizabeth Seitz
http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/astro-ph/0309679
Mechanism for vanishing zero point energy
Robert D klauber. Jan 2005.
This paper is way beyond my ken, if anyone has an interest, will
they please explain the basics.
I recently asked a whole range of questions and placed them all on the QM board, and I now realize asking many questions at once is non grata - as well as some of the subjects I brought up. However I thank those that answered, especially Kea who helped me with two answers in particular.
I'm...
Relativity and the "Dark Energy" question
I am an amateur and I am looking for help in answering the following question concretely - with numbers.
Time passes more slowly in a gravity well. This we know.
Regarding the expansion of the universe, and the increasing rate of expansion. If...
It's a very simple question i guess, what is dark energy? Is it like that proton and anti proton thing where the anti-proton contains dark energy or something like that? I read recently that they had found evidence of dark energy, what is it, what is the evidence, how did they find it and what...
Two new October papers.
the first is notable because of the reputation of some of the authors. Sean Carroll and Michael Turner are among a handful of the most prominent mainstream cosmologists.
here they are trying to see if one can avoid the need for dark energy by a modification of the...
Another one of the physics teacher working at the college I attended (see my previous post) wrote a book on basic http://universite.deboeck.com/Resources/Titles/28011100266200/Images/28011100266200L.gif . In this book it says that the expansion of the Universe is due to the expansion of space...
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=288415#post288415
here's a straw in the wind. A good thing about Baez post is the intuition comes through---nuance, the changing barometer
I think there is a hint here that he approves of people using the term "dark energy" because he sees a...
I'm reading Hawking's take on ground state energies never being zero, and he adds an interesting point. He said based on the casimir effect the denisty of ground state fluctuations (wavelengths) are less by a finite amount between the plates, causeing them to draw together. To me this explains...
Could anybody list (and write a few explanatory words about) the various theories which explain the origin of the dark matter and the dark energy?
Thanks!
dark matter --- dark energy
Can anyone explain to me the difference between dark matter and dark energy ?
What are their proper relations to the expanding universe?
Dark matter should be taken into account because we know not enough matter that can be held responsible for keeping...
It's interesting to note that if the universe expands to twice its current radius,then it will require 10^60 m^3 of space to be created per second, and so 10^60 x 10^-27kg of dark energy = 10^33kg of dark energy per second.
This means that the mass of 1000 Suns must be created every second in...
dark energy + "missing" antimatter
Did dark energy stop antimatter from being produced in the early universe
and is this why there is not much antimatter around today?
If black holes create dark energy, then the tendency for dark energy to cause expansion of space in the black hole would be balanced by the tendency of gravity to pull the mass of the black hole to one point.So a singularity would not form.Since dark energy is a kind of energy, its energy must...
The question that follows assumes that there can be energy
conservation in general relativity:
Dark energy is said to have a uniform energy distribution in space.But
how can the distribution be uniform if dark energy is created from
some other energy source, and energy sources such as...
Do dark energy models explain anything about the expansionary phase after the Big Bang? Maybe matter wasn't formed well enough and gravity wasn't working too well, so dark energy was by a large margin, the dominant force?
Also, can anyone give me a link to a timetable of the universe's...
Dark energy is space and its interaction with vacuum particles is space-time.
Matter affects dark energy and vacuum particles to curve space-time. Anyone agree?
If I double the size of a classical,non-quantum mechanical vacuum,
I double the volume of space and its density stays constant at zero
kg/ m ^3.As the amount of dark energy in the universe increases the volume of space increases and the density stays constant.Is dark energy space?
If I take two spherical regions of space about one metre in radius,
they would contain about 10 ^ - 27 kg of dark energy each.
If I now say that the centres of these regions are one metre apart,
and assume that there is rest mass associated with dark energy (this rest mass being uniformly...
Gluons are dark energy.
They emit gravitons and these collide with photons and cause them to lose
energy - as yet more gravitons - and redshift.
As the photons travel through space they get longer wavelengths and gravitons of longer wavelength (emitted by gluons) collide with them so
that...
cosmological constant = lambda
rho = mass density of dark energy
lambda = constant x rho
rho = lambda / constant
rho x volume of universe = lamda / constant x volume of universe = total mass of dark energy in universe
volume of universe = lambda / constant x total mass of dark...
Dark energy could be the energy of a huge number of gravitons.
As photons traveling from one galaxy to another redshift they could emit gravitons that adds to the dark energy total and so keep the density of dark energy constant.Also if the gravitons carry the colour force , like gluons,
then...
http://www.physicsweb.org/article/news/8/6/14
The latest findings, supposedly, refute the string theory approach, whereby the Dark Energy portion of the Universe is dynamical... or we don't have all the pieces in the puzzle yet?
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0406056
Casimir Energy Density at Planck Time: Cosmic Coincidence or Double Solution to the Cosmological Dark Energy Problem?
C. S. Unnikrishnan (Tata Institute, Mumbai)
5 pages
"The Casimir energy density calculated for a spherical shell of radius equal...
What is the difference between a scalar field and a vector field?
If I had a point mass with vectors pointing in all directions from its surface
the field of the mass could be said to have a magnitude and direction in all directions.I could call this a scalar because it is different from a...
"Vacuum fluctuations and the Casimir effect are considered in a cosmological setting. It is suggested that the dark energy, which recent observations suggest makes up 73% of our universe, is vacuum energy due to a causal boundary effect at the cosmological horizon."
A poster on SPR named...
Dark energy waves absorb energy from photons in intergalactic space
and the total energy of dark energy increases,
increasing the acceleration of the universe.
Because the dark energy is quantised when it absorbs
energy from a photon it changes to a higher energy
quantum state.If a cosmic...
Dark energy has a constant density as the universe expands.
Doesn't this suggest that the baryonic mass of the universe is
expanding in a substance of constant volume and density that occupies a volume far larger than the universe itself currently occupies?
The whole business of dark energy or cosmological constant or quintessence is novel, unfamiliar, and nebulous. Different models or mechanisms have been offered to explain apparent acceleration in expansion of U during past one-to-four billion years.
If you go back more than four or five billion...
http://www.astronomy.com/Content/Dynamic/Articles/000/000/001/604djcxv.asp
XMM-Newton studies the X-ray universe from Earth orbit.
ESA
A mystery that has been haunting the fields of physics and cosmology has just grown deeper. Dark energy, that stealthy ghost that lurks in the...
http://arxiv.org./abs/gr-qc/0402066
these people (at U British Columbia) study an idea for observing the effect of the cosmological constant (dark energy, negative pressure...) on the spectrum of Xrays coming from a black hole
their conclusion is disappointing, the test they study...
http://www.universetoday.com/am/publish/dark_energy_doubts.html
ESA's X-ray observatory, XMM-Newton, has returned tantalising new data about the nature of the Universe. In a survey of distant clusters of galaxies, XMM-Newton has found puzzling differences between today's clusters of galaxies...
this was a new post today
http://arxiv.org/astro-ph/0401244
it is still just a germinal idea
remember in 1998 type IA supernovae were used as a standard candle
and the luminosity-distances of them at various redshifts pointed to the existence of dark energy or cosmological constant...
http://arxiv.org/astro-ph/0309800
A group at University of Washington, Fardon et al
just posted "Dark Energy from Mass-Varying Neutrinos"
which does not seem to me as far-fetched as other speculation I've seen about cause of DE
they seem to think that some element of their idea is...