In physics, mass–energy equivalence is the relationship between mass and energy in a system's rest frame, where the two values differ only by a constant and the units of measurement. The principle is described by the physicist Albert Einstein's famous formula:
The formula defines the energy E of a particle in its rest frame as the product of mass (m) with the speed of light squared (c2). Because the speed of light is a large number in everyday units (approximately 3×108 meters per second), the formula implies that a small amount of rest mass corresponds to an enormous amount of energy, which is independent of the composition of the matter. Rest mass, also called invariant mass, is the mass that is measured when the system is at rest. It is a fundamental physical property that is independent of momentum, even at extreme speeds approaching the speed of light (i.e., its value is the same in all inertial frames of reference). Massless particles such as photons have zero invariant mass, but massless free particles have both momentum and energy. The equivalence principle implies that when energy is lost in chemical reactions, nuclear reactions, and other energy transformations, the system will also lose a corresponding amount of mass. The energy, and mass, can be released to the environment as radiant energy, such as light, or as thermal energy. The principle is fundamental to many fields of physics, including nuclear and particle physics.
Mass–energy equivalence arose from special relativity as a paradox described by the French polymath Henri Poincaré. Einstein was the first to propose the equivalence of mass and energy as a general principle and a consequence of the symmetries of space and time. The principle first appeared in "Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy-content?", one of his Annus Mirabilis (Miraculous Year) papers, published on 21 November 1905. The formula and its relationship to momentum, as described by the energy–momentum relation, were later developed by other physicists.
Where does e=mc^2 come from?
i would like a concise ( if possible ) mathematic proof, i know about derivatives, and integrals, so you can go on with that...
that's simply because i want to understand why it is like so... this is no homework, but i found no better place to ask it...
either way, you can help! so w=change in KE, and W=the line integral from 0 to s of FdotdS(I never learned how to use the latex thingy, so bear with me, the question isn't that hard...)
So then he wrote KE=lineintegral from 0-S, d/dt(gamma*mv)ds
and then from there you end up with...
I came across a book a few weeks ago that tried to explain how einstein "derived" the formula and wasn't sure how accurate the description was. I'll write it out as best I can so you can either pick faults with it or tell me it's correct:
In Einsteins thought experiment there is an isolated...
E=mc^2 is the simplified form of an equation given to us by Albert Einstein to describe the relationship between energy and mass. Translated into words, it says the amount of change (E) that we may expect a material subject to be able to produce is directly proportional to a it's mass (m) and...
You sacrifice mass to create energy (energy is just mass with a velocity), and the faster mass moves (relativity) the more massive the mass gets, is there some sort of significance to that? I hate riddles.
I posted this on the college board, but think it should go here. It is a college course, but at a high school level.
I feel kind of silly because this is probably a very basic problem, but I'm having problems with physics in general. Would anyone be able to tell me if I'm on the right track...
OK first let me explain, I have NO formal physics background, not even high school, so please don't flame me if these are dumb questions :smile:
1. What unit of measure is E? If it were distance we could say miles or kilometers.
2. I understand that this formula is for mass at rest. If...
If you have 1 kg of matter, what is the energy equivalent of it in say joules?
How much of the matter (heavy hidrogen?) that goes into a fusion reaction is transformed to energy?
And to the point...
Last year there was this discussion about what would happened if the Galileo orbiter...
Hi. I understand the equation, but I don't understand logically in my head why it is that way. Maxwell's equations, etc show it mathematically but I'm looking for a logical explanation of why it is this way. Like for instance, the logical connection for F=MA would be "more force is needed to...
I have a question about the true meaning of E=mc^2. For starters, a certain amount of mass (m) can be converted into an amount of energy (mc^2), or vice versa. For example, two antiparticles can annihilate and leave only energy behind. So it is mass-energy that is a conserved quantity, not...
hi,
This has probably been asked and answered a million times before so sorry but here goes. I urgently need help with a Maths University project about the A-Bomb which will include a chapter on Special Relativity and e=mc^2. I have read loads of books but they treat special relativity from a...
Hi all,
When thinking about equations of momentum for photons and i came up with this problem.
Say you take the equation E=mc^2 and re-arrange it so m is the subject, m=E/(c^2)
Now the Energy of a photon is also given by the equation Ep=hf and the 'mass' can therefore be said as...
On a couple of webisites I have seen that they have equated E=mc^2 with E=hf ... i.e hf=mc^2
But how can this be done when E=hf is describing the energy of a photon and E=mc^2 isnt?
Also, can someone provide me with a derivation of de Broglie’s theorem ?
Wavelength = h/momentum...
Hey all,
Just discovered your informative forum. In these times of stupidity, its good to see people with a love of knowledge.
A friend asked me the following question:
"if you know the mass & speed of a plane, can you use this theory
to calculate it's energy?"
I assume the answer...
Proof for E=mc^2...
This is an apparent proof for e=mc^2 which i copied of the internet, but I have some problems with it:
"An object that emits a ray of light will recoil at a velocity v, given
by:
v = EM ......[1]
where E is the energy of the emission and M is the mass of...
:wink: Thank god i finally find a physics forum.
Does it give light the the equation E=mc^2 that if mass comes from Giggs field carried by Giggs Boson?
Thank u :smile:
What does the unit and magnitude of constant 'G' mean, and what is its relation with graviton? ANY OPINION?
Here is how i see it:
E=mc^2
c^2=E/m where E=W=Fr (r stands for radius or distance or ‘s’)
therefore c^2= Fr/m
therefore c^2= c^2----when forces interact the forces hold true...
I am "heavy" or having "more mass"? E=mc^2
Well,
I was discussing a problem with my physics teacher, it is seems very simple. However, it seems also that it require a bit of philosophy :)
Here it is:
Imagine that there is an object which moves with a constant velocity in a certain...