Quantum entanglement is a physical phenomenon that occurs when a group of particles are generated, interact, or share spatial proximity in a way such that the quantum state of each particle of the group cannot be described independently of the state of the others, including when the particles are separated by a large distance. The topic of quantum entanglement is at the heart of the disparity between classical and quantum physics: entanglement is a primary feature of quantum mechanics lacking in classical mechanics.
Measurements of physical properties such as position, momentum, spin, and polarization performed on entangled particles can, in some cases, be found to be perfectly correlated. For example, if a pair of entangled particles is generated such that their total spin is known to be zero, and one particle is found to have clockwise spin on a first axis, then the spin of the other particle, measured on the same axis, is found to be counterclockwise. However, this behavior gives rise to seemingly paradoxical effects: any measurement of a particle's properties results in an irreversible wave function collapse of that particle and changes the original quantum state. With entangled particles, such measurements affect the entangled system as a whole.
Such phenomena were the subject of a 1935 paper by Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen, and several papers by Erwin Schrödinger shortly thereafter, describing what came to be known as the EPR paradox. Einstein and others considered such behavior impossible, as it violated the local realism view of causality (Einstein referring to it as "spooky action at a distance") and argued that the accepted formulation of quantum mechanics must therefore be incomplete.
Later, however, the counterintuitive predictions of quantum mechanics were verified in tests where polarization or spin of entangled particles was measured at separate locations, statistically violating Bell's inequality. In earlier tests, it couldn't be ruled out that the result at one point could have been subtly transmitted to the remote point, affecting the outcome at the second location. However, so-called "loophole-free" Bell tests have been performed where the locations were sufficiently separated that communications at the speed of light would have taken longer—in one case, 10,000 times longer—than the interval between the measurements.According to some interpretations of quantum mechanics, the effect of one measurement occurs instantly. Other interpretations which don't recognize wavefunction collapse dispute that there is any "effect" at all. However, all interpretations agree that entanglement produces correlation between the measurements and that the mutual information between the entangled particles can be exploited, but that any transmission of information at faster-than-light speeds is impossible.Quantum entanglement has been demonstrated experimentally with photons, neutrinos, electrons, molecules as large as buckyballs, and even small diamonds. The utilization of entanglement in communication, computation and quantum radar is a very active area of research and development.
Might quantum entanglement explain the cosmological constant, isotropy, flatness, magnetic monopole and horizon problems? Instead of inflation introducing a phase change that caused an exponential expansion in the early universe, perhaps entanglement has maintained a statistical causality...
I read about quantum entanglement in an article about teleportation I read on the web.
If two particles can be connected despite an enormous distance, in such a way that the properties of one can be transferred to another, even though no wire or string is linking them, can you use this...
Entanglement and information seem to be the new buzz words in the particle
camp, two theories that seem natural to me, but should include QG to make
a workable quantum universe.
If particles carry information by spin ,and exchange information by entanglement
how would gravity communicate?
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/0506/0506113.pdf
Title: Entanglement in an expanding spacetime
Authors: J. L. Ball (Oxford U.), I. Fuentes-Schuller (Oxford U. and Perimeter Inst.), F. P. Schuller (Perimeter Inst.)
Comments: I. F-S published previously under Fuentes-Guridi
We show...
I read up on wikipedia.com about entanglement and teleportation but it left me with a few questions. If you go to This Link. You'll see that they give the analogy "Bob has created two atoms called I and II which are maximally entangled". Now obviously, bob can't create two atoms at will so how...
Soppuse Alice have two particles A and C that are in a partly entangled state
|Y(A,C)>. We also have another person Bob (ofcourse) with whom Alice share a pair of entangled particles D and E in the singlet state.
Now suppose Alice make a measurement on her two particles C and D, she...
I need a bit of clarity on quantum entanglement... Any of the 'Bell experiments' will do, but for the sake of discussion, I'll reference http://roxanne.roxanne.org/epr/experiment.html .
Now, the data is obviously in favor of the predictions of QM. Admittedly, I am currently unable to...
Hi all,
1) does the Compton-scattering produce an entangled state?
That is, if I measure the energy of the photon, the energy of the
electron is immediately known and vice versa.
2) Can the photon after scattering be considered as a superposition
of energy-states?
-Edgardo
Hey, folks.
A pretty light read on how quantum entanglement works, starting from first principles without using math but with lots of pictures. Quite good!
http://www.joot.com/dave/writings/articles/entanglement/
Ciao!
T
For more than 70 years, QM advocates have misrepresented Einstein's EPR work. Once it becomes clear what Einstein was really saying, it should be very difficult to stick with Bohr's bizarre interpretation of entanglement.
Among the FEATURE ARTICLES (Cover Story) of the Scientific American...
So silly question! but how does EPR and entanglement theory are related?
I mean the history and its cocepts of similarities.
Thanks in advance.
Somy :smile:
Hi All,
I just came across a paragraph in a little book called "Entanglement" by Amir Aczel. In it it said that Wayne Myrvold proved that it is undecidable whether two states are entangled or not. Does anyone have any knowledge or references to his ideas?
Thanks,
Jurgen
Hello
I would be interrested in good (web) references dealing with "entanglement measures".
I am looking for not too mathematical references.
I would like to see the connections with physics more than with quantum information theory.
I would be interrested to see the concepts applied to...
Hi everybody,
For the ones interested by a hidden variable model of EPR state with a hidden communication channel , I recommend the last Cerf, Gisisn Massar and Popescu quant-ph/0410027 paper (4 pages – a short concise one). I think it is a good one (with the pointers it gives).
It...
I'm trying to understand why entanglement is said to be "spooky."
The model I have is that 2 entangled particles are related, such that they have identical states when measured. The entanglement process is what ensures they have identical states. So it's no surprise they measure out the same...
Please explain what's entanglement distillation and what's entanglement concentration. I'm mistaken to think that these two techniques are related somehow?
This is probably not the best site to get scientific information from, but still:
http://computer.howstuffworks.com/quantum-computer1.htm
I don't understand the final bit - how does entanglement allow scientists to know the value of the qubits? I can understand how it could allow them to...
Can quantum entanglement effect be explained by a carrier particle traveling along spacetime geodesics with a zero time component? Or perhaps traveling along normal geodesics and then falling back in time along a time-like curve? Either of these essentially forms inifinite-speed motion of the...
What I say or do here and now can affect someone somewhere sometime, is this the same as quantum entanglement?
If no one doesn't say or does here and now then nothing will ever happen in the future. Someone can only do or say something only if he or she is alive. But what someone does or says...
Quantum entanglement, if I understand it correctly, specifies the phenomenon where the scattered pieces of a particle somehow know the whereabouts of its other pieces.
Does that mean that by taking a neutron from atom A and placing it away from atom A, the atom would know where the missing...
First post.
There's something I don't quite understand about quantum entanglement and I'm hoping someone here can put me right. When I first heard about the Aspect experiment, I thought that it had to open the way forward for faster-than-light information transfer as follows:
Bob is on...
I would like your comments on whether a model of EPR entanglement based on superstring theory makes any sense.
Let's suppose we are concerned with understanding the entanglement of an electron/positron particle pair created at a point in an EPR experiment. The particles fly off in opposite...
OK, I would really appreciate it if somebody could explain to me as simply as possible why entanglement happens (between electrons), what a Cooper pair is, and what causes superconductivity.
I have read that if two electrons are entangled and something happens to one of them, it will affect...
Are virtual particles entangled when they appear? If so then when one of the pair falls into a black hole and other flies off, do they remain entangled? If so, does this mean that by observing black hole radiation we can in principle 'see inside'?