Introduced by the Italian-French mathematician and astronomer Joseph-Louis Lagrange in 1788, Lagrangian mechanics is a formulation of classical mechanics and is founded on the stationary action principle.
Lagrangian mechanics defines a mechanical system to be a pair
(
M
,
L
)
{\displaystyle (M,L)}
of a configuration space
M
{\displaystyle M}
and a smooth function
L
=
L
(
q
,
v
,
t
)
{\displaystyle L=L(q,v,t)}
called Lagrangian. By convention,
L
=
T
−
V
,
{\displaystyle L=T-V,}
where
T
{\displaystyle T}
and
V
{\displaystyle V}
are the kinetic and potential energy of the system, respectively. Here
q
∈
M
,
{\displaystyle q\in M,}
and
v
{\displaystyle v}
is the velocity vector at
q
{\displaystyle q}
(
v
{\displaystyle (v}
is tangential to
M
)
.
{\displaystyle M).}
(For those familiar with tangent bundles,
L
:
T
M
×
R
t
→
R
,
{\displaystyle L:TM\times \mathbb {R} _{t}\to \mathbb {R} ,}
and
v
∈
T
q
M
)
.
{\displaystyle v\in T_{q}M).}
Given the time instants
t
1
{\displaystyle t_{1}}
and
t
2
,
{\displaystyle t_{2},}
Lagrangian mechanics postulates that a smooth path
x
0
:
[
t
1
,
t
2
]
→
M
{\displaystyle x_{0}:[t_{1},t_{2}]\to M}
describes the time evolution of the given system if and only if
x
0
{\displaystyle x_{0}}
is a stationary point of the action functional
S
[
x
]
=
def
∫
t
1
t
2
L
(
x
(
t
)
,
x
˙
(
t
)
,
t
)
d
t
.
{\displaystyle {\cal {S}}[x]\,{\stackrel {\text{def}}{=}}\,\int _{t_{1}}^{t_{2}}L(x(t),{\dot {x}}(t),t)\,dt.}
If
M
{\displaystyle M}
is an open subset of
R
n
{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}
and
t
1
,
{\displaystyle t_{1},}
t
2
{\displaystyle t_{2}}
are finite, then the smooth path
x
0
{\displaystyle x_{0}}
is a stationary point of
S
{\displaystyle {\cal {S}}}
if all its directional derivatives at
x
0
{\displaystyle x_{0}}
vanish, i.e., for every smooth
{\displaystyle \delta {\cal {S}}\ {\stackrel {\text{def}}{=}}\ {\frac {d}{d\varepsilon }}{\Biggl |}_{\varepsilon =0}{\cal {S}}\left[x_{0}+\varepsilon \delta \right]=0.}
The function
δ
(
t
)
{\displaystyle \delta (t)}
on the right-hand side is called perturbation or virtual displacement. The directional derivative
δ
S
{\displaystyle \delta {\cal {S}}}
on the left is known as variation in physics and Gateaux derivative in Mathematics.
Lagrangian mechanics has been extended to allow for non-conservative forces.
Homework Statement
I am given a Lagrangian, which, per assignment text, describes a single degree of freedom:
L= \frac{I}{2}(\dot{q}+\omega)^2-kq^2
I need to find the Hamiltonian.
Now, what I am wondering, when performing the Legrende transform...
Homework Statement
The pendulum of a grandfather clock consists of a thin rod of length L (and negligible mass) attached at its upper end to a fixed point, and attached at its lower end to a point on the edge of a uniform disk of radius R, mass M, and negligible thickness. The disk is free...
Hello,
I run across the following Lagrangian, $$\mathcal{L} = m \dot{x}\dot{y} + \frac{1}{2} \gamma (x \dot{y} - \dot{x} y) $$
I can see how a variation with respect to $$ x, y $$ yields the (viscous) equations of motions
$$ \ddot{x} + \dot{x} = 0 \quad, \quad \ddot{y} - \dot{y} = 0 $$...
Lagrangian I have is little bit massy so I don't write in here.
Like in ψψ(dagger) , or ψ∅ -> ψ∅, How can I calculate the differential cross section or total, or amplitudes?
What I know:
L = T - V
V = e^(x1-x2) + e^(x2-x3) for n = 3 and a mass = 1
What I believe:
T = .5Ʃ (x'_i)^2 from 1 to n
So let's say you have three bodys that can just be considered pints masses of 1 and on the same line:
x1 x2 x3
They have an...
I'm a little confused about why the Lagrangian is Lorentz invariant and the Hamiltonian is not. I keep reading that the Lagrangian is "obviously" Lorentz invariant because it's a scalar, but isn't the Hamiltonian a scalar also?
I've been thinking this issue must be somewhat more complex...
Hi.
Let's say we have a complex scalar field \varphi and we separate it into the real and the imaginary parts:
\varphi = (\varphi1 + i\varphi2)
It's Lagrangian density L is given by:
L = L(\varphi1) + L(\varphi1)
Can you tell the argument behind the idea that in summing the densities of...
Homework Statement
A particle of mass m slides frictionlessly down a smooth track defined by the function y=f(x)=((-x^3)/a^2) where a is a constant with units of length. The particle is also in a uniform gravitational field. Set the lagrangian up in cartesian coordinates x and yHomework...
I'm trying to express the classical gravitation Einstein-Hilbert lagrangian into some nice way, and I'm having a problem.
It is well known that the Einstein-Hilbert action is the following (I don't write the constant in front of the integral, to simplify things) :
S_{EH} = \int R \, \sqrt{-g}...
Homework Statement
http://fotozrzut.pl/zdjecia/ad3bbdd9f6.jpg
Mases are as stated on the picture, I is the moment of inertia of the pulley, angle marked is ω and a is a radius.
Homework Equations
L=T-V
The Attempt at a Solution
I try to formulate a lagrangian for this system...
Hello,
Where can I find a good explanation (book) of the derivation via Noether's theorem of the three momentum and angular momentum operators of the usual maxwell lagrangian ?
Thank you!
Homework Statement
A cylinder on a inclined plane is rolling without slipping. Inclined plane is connected to wall with a spring and cylinder is connected to wall with a spring too. All frictions will be neglected, and all the given data has shown on the image below.
As seen above, k2...
Homework Statement
I am trying to write down the path integral for the Jaynes-Cummings Model which involves obtaining the Lagrangian.
Homework Equations
\hat{H}_{\text{JC}} = \hbar \nu \hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a} +\hbar \omega \frac{\hat{\sigma}_z}{2} +\frac{\hbar \Omega}{2}...
Homework Statement
A thin rod of length 2b is suspended by 2 light strings both attached to the ceiling. Using x, y1, y2 as your generalized coordinates right down the lagrangian of the system. Where x is the longitudinal displacement of the rod and y1 and y2 are the horizontal displacements...
Homework Statement
I included the problem as an attachment. My difficulty lies within understanding how to account for the applied torque within the Lagrangian and subsequent Euler-Lagrange equations, which is what I want to use to determine the equations of motion of the bead on the hoop...
A point of mass m, affected by gravity, is obliged to be in a vertical plan on a parabola with equation z = a.r^2
a is a constant and r is the distance between the point of mass m and the OZ vertical axis. Write the Lagrange equations in the cases that the plan of the parabola is :
a) is...
Homework Statement Write the lagrangian equations for:
A simple pendulum whose suspension point oscillates horizontally in its plan according to the law x = a.cos(ωt)My problem is trying to know which are the generalized coordinates.
i considered :x (θ) = a.cos(ωt) + l.sinθ
y (θ) = l.cos...
In Newton's problem,and other central force problems in Classical Mechanics, you can get with decreasing the center of mass movement to the lagrangian:
L=1/2m(r' ^2+r^2 \varphi'^2)-V(r)
because \varphi is cyclic, you can write:
\frac{d}{dt}(mr^2 \varphi')=0
or, defining the angular...
I just read some basic concepts on General Relativity, and this idea pops up: I know we should use variations of metrics for gravitational field in the Lagrangian. But considering the resemblance of gravitational field(weak-field) to electromagnetic field, can we construct a 4-potential similar...
Probably, the essence of quantum theory (QT) is principle of uncertainty (HUP).
The essence of QT is also the fact that Fourier transformation of wave function in phase(?) space gives wave function in momentum space. If one wave function is Gaussian (and so both ones) this gives HUP.
Very...
Homework Statement
Find the equations for the utility maximizing values for x and y
U(x,y) = x^2 + y^2Homework Equations
Budget constraint: I = PxX +Pyy
L(x,y,\lambda ) x^2 + y^2 + \lambda (I - PxX - PyY)
The Attempt at a Solution
I got the three partial derivatives and set equal to zero...
In Goldstein, the action is defined by I=\int L dt. However, when dealing with constraints that haven't been implicitly accounted for by the generalized coordinates, the action integral is redefined to
I = \int \left( L + \sum\limits_{\alpha=1}^m \lambda_{\alpha} f_a \right) dt.
f is...
Hello, I've started a course on QFT and I'm having some troubles trying to find the solution of this exercise:
Write the action of a non-relativistic spineless free particle in a manifestly hermitian way
The problem should be simple but I'm a bit lost in the hermitian way part... What does it...
Hi, the attached picture shows a derivation of what I can only assume to be the property that the lagrange equations are invariant under a transformation of the coordinates.
But I have some trouble understanding how you go from the term pointed out the rear of the arrow to the point pointed...
Homework Statement
See attached picture for problem.
Homework Equations
Lagranges equation.
The Attempt at a Solution
So I have found the lagrangian to be:
L = ½ma2(θ'2+\omega2sinθ) - mgacosθ
I think this is correct but I have some questions on the further solution of the...
Hey guys. I'm trying to gather some tips that people have acquired that helps them write the Lagrangian for a system. Obviously, the classic examples are drilled into our heads over and over, but just when you think you can tackle any problem the professor throws at you, there is that tricky one...
A lot of conservation laws are derived from the lagrangian in my book. However, I fail to see why the Lagrangian incorporates action-reaction. Since it works for an arbitrary amount of particles and linear momentum can be show to be conserved from translational invariance it must do so.
But...
Homework Statement
Show that if the potential in the Lagrangian contains-velocity dependent terms, the canonical momentum corresponding to the coordinate of rotation θ, is no longer the mechanical angular momentum but is given by:
p = L - Ʃn\bulletri x ∇viU
Homework Equations...
I have seen the lagrange equations derived from Newtons laws in the special case, where forces were derivable from a potential.
Now with the introduction of hamiltons principle, I think my book wants to say this: We can always find a lagrangian such that the principle of least action holds...
So in my internet readings on Lagrangian mechanics I started researching applications with non-potential and/or non-conservative forces and came across this page:
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/336k/Newton/node90.html
This page is fascinating but I'm having a bit of difficulty...
So the integral of the lagrangian over time must be stationary according to hamiltons principle.
One can show that this leads to the euler lagrange equations, one for each pair of coordinates (qi,qi').
But my book has now started on defining a generalized lagrangian where lagrangian...
Hi all,
Doing some self-study on Lagrangian uses on the internet and I'm getting it pretty well thus far, but I'm just not sure how external forces fit in exactly. Up until now I've only tackled problems with gravity and constraints involved but intuitively I know that kinetic and potential...
Homework Statement
A uniform thin disk rolls without slipping on a plane and a force is being applied at its center parallel to the plane. Find the lagrangian and thereby the generalized force.Homework Equations
Lagranges equation.The Attempt at a Solution
This is my first ever exercise of this...
Homework Statement
Right I've got a relativistic particle in D dimensional space interacting with a central potential field. Writing out the entire lagrangian is a bit complicated on this but I'm sure you all know the L for a free relativistic particle. The potential term is Ae-br where r is...
This issue has always bothered me, and I would like to hear a logical resolution. The classical prescription for finding it is L=T-V. From the LaGrangian, the equations are motion are then deduced using the Euler-LaGrange eqs. But - the equations are motion are required in order to determine T...
This seems like such a simple question that I fully expect its solution to be embarrassingly easy, but try as I might I can't get the answer.
Consider some system which can be described by N generalized coordinates q_1,...,q_N and a Lagrangian L(q_i,\dot{q}_i,t). (I'll just use q_i as a stand...
On page 13 in Landau-Lifgarbagez Mechanics, the total time time derivative of the Lagrangian of a closed system is given to be,
\frac{d L}{d t} = \sum_i \frac{\partial L}{\partial q_i} \dot{q_i} + \sum_i \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q_i}} \ddot{q_i}
Why does this stop here? I mean, why...
My friend and I have been getting all confused about the following problem with a Lagrangian. It comes from David Tong's online notes on QFT, but given it is about the Lagrangian, I figure it does well in this section.
Ok, Tong is talking about Noether's theorem, and using the example of...
Recently i am reading A.Zee's Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell 2nd Edition. there is a equation that i can not derive by myself. I suspect its correctness.
<k1k2|exp(-iHT)|k3k4>=<k1k2|exp(i∫dxL(x))|k3k4>, where the L(x) on the RHS is an operator function of space-time.
This equation...
After finding the equations of motion of a pendulum in an accelerating cart:
\ddot{\phi} + \frac{acos\phi +gsin\phi}{l}=0
,the method that Taylor uses in Prob 7.30 for finding the small angle frequency, is to rewrite \phi as \phi_{0}+\delta \phi. Then you can use a trig identity in the...
This is not a homework or test or textbook question or exercise. I am asking purely out of curiosity. Please do not tell me to post this in homework help or give me another infraction.
I have gathered that the Lagrangian approach will follow an individual particle to record some streamline...
Preparing for classical prelim, just wondering if this solution is correct.
Homework Statement
A particle with mass m and charge q moves in a uniform magnetic field \boldsymbol{B}=B\boldsymbol{\hat{z}}. Write a Lagrangian describing the motion of the particle in the xy plane that gives the...
Any advice on deriving the lagrangian for a particle in a magnetic field?
L=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2} + \frac{q}{c}\mathbf{v}\mathbf{.} \mathbf{A}
I've been searching through Griffith's, Jackson, and google to no avail.
Can we start from the lorentz force and work backwards?
Thanks for the help.
Since it is based on the kinetic energy less the potential energy, what does the Lagrangian actually represent? Is there some intuitive way to understand why it is defined so and why it is such a fruitful concept using the principle of least action?
In texts about Lagrangian mechanics,at first Lagrangian is defined as below:
L=T-V
T and V being kinetic and potential energy respectively
But when you proceed,they say that for some forces like magnetic forces Lagrangian is as such and can't be obtained by the above formula but it doesn't...
In some texts about Lagrangian mechanics,its written that the generalized coordinates need not be length and angles(as is usual in coordinate systems)but they also can be quantities with other dimensions,say,energy,length^2 or even dimensionless.
I want to know how will be the Lagrange's...
Hello, how do we apply the idea of the Lagrangian to a Brownian motion? I guess what I mean is what is the Lagrangian functional form for a Brownian motion?
Thanks
I am wondering, how does lagrangian of such system look like?
Will it be:
L=\frac{m_{1} \cdot \dot{y}^2}{2} + \frac{m_{2} \cdot \dot{x}^2}{2} +\frac{m_{3} \cdot (\dot{y'}^2+\dot{x'}^2)}{2} + \frac{I \cdot \dot{ \alpha }^2}{2} - mgy - mgy'
where:
y'=\frac{l}{2}sin(\alpha)...
Okay, so I've recently been reading through C. Pozrikdis' Introduction to Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, and came across an interesting exercise: "Discuss whether it is possible to label all point particles within a finite three-dimensional parcel using a single scalar variable...