In mathematics, the Laplace operator or Laplacian is a differential operator given by the divergence of the gradient of a function on Euclidean space. It is usually denoted by the symbols
∇
⋅
∇
{\displaystyle \nabla \cdot \nabla }
,
∇
2
{\displaystyle \nabla ^{2}}
(where
∇
{\displaystyle \nabla }
is the nabla operator), or
Δ
{\displaystyle \Delta }
. In a Cartesian coordinate system, the Laplacian is given by the sum of second partial derivatives of the function with respect to each independent variable. In other coordinate systems, such as cylindrical and spherical coordinates, the Laplacian also has a useful form. Informally, the Laplacian Δf(p) of a function f at a point p measures by how much the average value of f over small spheres or balls centered at p deviates from f(p).
The Laplace operator is named after the French mathematician Pierre-Simon de Laplace (1749–1827), who first applied the operator to the study of celestial mechanics, where the operator gives a constant multiple of the mass density when it is applied to the gravitational potential due to the mass distribution with that given density. Solutions of the equation Δf = 0, now called Laplace's equation, are the so-called harmonic functions and represent the possible gravitational fields in regions of vacuum.
The Laplacian occurs in differential equations that describe many physical phenomena, such as electric and gravitational potentials, the diffusion equation for heat and fluid flow, wave propagation, and quantum mechanics. The Laplacian represents the flux density of the gradient flow of a function. For instance, the net rate at which a chemical dissolved in a fluid moves toward or away from some point is proportional to the Laplacian of the chemical concentration at that point; expressed symbolically, the resulting equation is the diffusion equation. For these reasons, it is extensively used in the sciences for modelling a variety of physical phenomena. The Laplacian is the simplest elliptic operator and is at the core of Hodge theory as well as the results of de Rham cohomology. In image processing and computer vision, the Laplacian operator has been used for various tasks, such as blob and edge detection.
Given a bounded domain with the homogeneous Neumann boundary condition, show that the Laplacian has an eigenvalue equal to zero (show that there is a nonzero function u such that ∆u = 0, with the homogeneous Neumann B.C.).
I said: ∇•(u∇u)=u∆u+∇u2, since ∆u = 0, we have ∇•(u∇u)=∇u2
∫...
Hello.
I would like to numerically determine eigenvalues of a rectangular membrane
which is twisted for \frac{\pi}{2}. Example picture:
I'm solving Helmholtz equation:
\nabla^2u+k^2u=0
where u=u(x,y) and
\nabla^2 u=\frac{\partial^2u}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2v}{\partial y^2}...
Hi,
During the description of vector spherical harmonics, where N = curl of M , I came across the following :
Laplacian of N = Laplacian of (Curl of M) = Curl of (Laplacian of M)
How do we know that these operators can be interchanged ? What is the general rule for such interchanges...
Homework Statement
I'm trying to show that the wave equation is not invariant under Galilean transform. To do that I need to figure out how the Laplacian transforms from S to S'. I seem to have trouble understanding why the laplacian actually changes.
Homework Equations
x'=x-vt, t'=t
The...
In my derivation of one of Maxwell's Equations, I needed the fact that the Laplacian of 1/r vanishes everywhere except at r=0, where r is the norm of a radial vector.
I cannot see how this is? I like to be solid in the math I use for a derivation, so this would really help if someone could...
Tell me I'm not going mad. If I have a vector field of the form \mathbf{A}=(0,A(x,y,z),0) and I want to take the Laplacian of it, \nabla^{2}\mathbf{A}, can I take the Laplacian of the co-ordinate function A(x,y,z)? Will this be the same for the case of cylindrical co-ordinates?
Mat
Hi,
According to eg Nakahara's conventions the Laplacian on a form K is given by
\Delta K = (dd^{\dagger} + d^{\dagger}d)K
In my case K is a two form living in R^3. I've calculated the Laplacian and arrive at
\Delta K = \Bigl( \frac{1}{3!}\epsilon^{klm}\epsilon^n_{\...
The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine_structure#Darwin_term" contains a (3D-)delta function as a result of taking the Laplacian of the Coulomb potential. I'm trying to find out why. I've been searching, and I've so far come across different views of the Laplacian of 1/r at the origin. Either...
I am trying to show that the laplacian:
L = -\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}
can also be represented as:
L = \frac{1}{2}(\vec{E}^{2}-\vec{B}^{2})
where F^{\mu\nu} = \partial{}^{\mu}A^{\nu} - \partial{}^{\nu}A^{\mu}
and
F_{\mu\nu} = g_{\mu\alpha}F^{\alpha\beta}g_{\beta\nu}
A is the...
Homework Statement
Two concentric spherical shells. The outer shell is split into two hemispheres at potentials +Vo for the upper half and -Vo for the lower half. The inner shell is at zero potential (see attachment).
" what is the potential in the region; r > R' " (the potential in the...
Homework Statement
What is a laplacian of a laplacian?
Homework Equations
laplacian = \Delta = \nabla^2 = \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial z^2}
The Attempt at a Solution
Is the follow true?
\nabla^2\nabla^2=\nabla^4
Also...
Stupid thing I noticed today:
\nabla^2 U=tr(H(U))
Or, in other words, the Laplacian of a function is just the trace of its Hessian matrix. Whoop-de-frickin do, right? Is this useful knowledge or should I forget it immediately?
N!
Something occurred to me just now. A question about the scalar potential.
First I will do some calculations of the laplacian of the scalar potential in different electrostatic situations to give myself a basis for my question.
Point charge:
\phi =\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{q}{r}...
Hey All,
In my vector calculus class my lecturer was showing that the laplacian of 1/r is zero. He further said that since 1/r and its derivatives are not defined at the origin we state that the Laplacian of 1/r is zero for all values of r not equal to zero. He then says that this caveat is...
I wish to solve a 2D steady state heat equation analytically. The boundary is a square. The top side is maintained at 100 C, while the other sides are maintained at 0 C.
The differential equation governing the temperature distribution will be the laplacian equation. To solve the equation...
Lets consider the equation:
\nabla^2 f=0
I know that in spherical coordinates this equation may be decomposed into two equations,
first which depends only on r, and the second one which has the form of spherical harmonics equation except that the l(l+1) is an arbitrary constant, let's say C...
Has anyone ever heard about a Complex Laplace Operator? I would like to build one from first principles as in differential geometry ∆=d*d, where d is the exterior derivative, but I don't know where to start. Actually, I was even unsure in which forum to post the question.
If one defines d to...
Homework Statement
I want to calculate \nabla\times[\vec{F}(r)] and \nabla^2[\vec{F}(r)] where F if a function that depends of r, and r = \sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}
Homework Equations
1)\nabla \times \vec A = \left|\begin{matrix} \mathbf{\hat{i}} & \mathbf{\hat{j}} & \mathbf{\hat{k}} \\ \\...
Homework Statement
I have $\int \nabla^2 \vec{u} \cdot \vec{v} dV$ where u and v are velocities integrated over a volume. I want to perform integration by parts so that the derivative orders are the same. This is the Galerkin method.
Homework Equations
The Attempt at a Solution
I have...
given the Laplacian for a certain metric 'g'
\Delta f = \partial _i \partial ^{i}f + (\partial ^{i}f) \partial _ i log |g|^{1/2}
where a sum over 'i' dummy variable is assumed
the idea is , could we factorize this Hamiltonian a second order differential operator into two first order...
Hi;
I am trying to understand the rytov approximation... and when I was studying that, I could not understand a manipilation...
ΔeØ + k2eØ = 0
▼[▼ØeØ] + k2eØ = 0
▼2ØeØ + (▼Ø)2eØ+k2eØ = 0
I can not understand these manipilations... for a long time, I have searched the properties of...
http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/1816/laplaceds2.jpg
Right I have a fair few questions on this, it's relating to question 7 only, although you need to refer back to the equation derived from question 6.
1) I used the equation from q6. as a Fourier series substituting r=a. I end up with an...
What is the physical significance of the laplacian operator?
The laplacian operator is the divergence of the gradient. I understand the intuitive meanings of both. The gradient when dotted against a unit vector gives the rate of change in that direction. The divergence is the flow in or out...
Strange Laplacian of 1/|x-x’| !?
Please read the file first (http://www.pa.msu.edu/courses/2007fall/PHY481/lectures/lecture08.pdf" ) ..
and look into page 8
there is a sentence like this "Evaluate right side with sphere, radius R around origin"
Now there comes up against a question ...
This is my first post, so if it belongs somewhere else, please help me out. I've got a homework problem that I believe I solved, but I'm not sure if I did it right. (It seems too easy this way.)
I am given that \vec{L}=-i(\vec{r}X\nabla). I have to prove the relation that...
Hi.
In http://www-personal.umich.edu/~pran/jackson/P505/p1s.pdf" solution(page 2) to Jackson 1.5 it is stated that
\nabla^2 \left(\frac{1}{r}\right)=-4\pi\delta^3(\mathbf r).
But why is this true?
\nabla^2\left(\frac{1}{r}\right)=\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{d}{d...
Hey! I'm self-studying a bit of quantum chemistry this summer. My introductory P.chem book (David Ball) doesn't specifically show the conversion of the laplacian operator from Cartesian to spherical coordinates. I don't really feel satisfied until I've actually derived it myself... So...
Homework Statement
If anyone could clarify this statement for me, I'm having a bit of difficulty interpreting what the heck I'm supposed to do:
"For a given potential difference V0 between the inner and outer conductors and for a given fixed value of b, determine the inner radius a for which...
I've been reading up on these three recently, and wondered if anyone could confirm what I think they do. I'm not 100% I understand these.
del (\bigtriangleup), when applied to a scalar, creates a vector with that scalar as each of the XYZ values. eg
\bigtriangleup . x = (x,x,x)...
They say that vector laplacian is defined as the following:
\nabla^2 \vec{A} = \nabla(\nabla\cdot\vec{A}) - \nabla\times(\nabla \times\vec{A})
Is the above definition true for all coordinate systems or just for cartesian coordinate system?
--- --- ---
Also, wikipedia say the following...
I need to know the steps involved in solving this laplacian.
Ex(r,z) = Eo*e^[-(r/ro)^2]*e^[-ibz]
the laplacian \/^2*Eo = ?
Eo is a vector
\/ is laplacian symbol
any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Hey...
Could someone help me out with deriving the LaPlacian in spherical coordinates? I tried using the chain rule but it just isn't working out well.. any sort of hint would be appriciated. :)
\nabla^2 = \frac{1}{r^2} [ \frac{\partial}{\partial r} ( r^2 \frac{\partial}{\partial r} ) +...
Given:
F(s) = (s-1)/(s+1)^3
Find:
f(t)
Solution:
Using the equation that when F(s) = n!/(s-a)^(n=1), L^(-1){F(s)} = t^n*e^(at)
So far I find that f(t) = e^(-t)*(-t^2+__)
The book says that f(t) = e^(-t)*(t-t^2)
How did they get the t?
we are given the laplacian:
(d^2)u/(dx^2) + (d^2)u/(dy^2) = 0 where the derivatives are partial. we have the B.C's
u=0 for (-1<y<1) on x=0
u=0 on the lines y=plus or minus 1 for x>0
u tends to zero as x tends to infinity.
Using separation of variable I get the general solution
u =...
I'm supposed to prove the laplacian in cylindrical coord. is what it is. I tried tackling the problem in two ways and none work! I have no idea what's the matter. The first way is to calculate d²f/dr² , d²f/dO² and d²f/dz² and isolate d²f/dx² , d²f/dy² and d²f/dz². In cylindrical coord...
According to the definition, an operator T that commutes with all components of the angular momentum operator is a scalar, or rank zero, operator. What is the mathematical definition to that statement?
How can I prove that the four dimensional Laplacian is a scalar operator?
Regards,
:biggrin:
I need to take the \nabla^2 of x^2+y^2+z^2. This is how far I got
\begin{gather*}
\nabla^2 = \frac{d^2}{dr^2} + \frac{2}{r} \frac{d}{dr} + \frac{1}{r^2}(\frac{1}{sin^2\theta}\frac{d^2}{d\Phi^2} + \frac{1}{sin\theta}\frac{d}{d\theta} sin\theta\frac{d}{d\theta})\\
\nabla^2(r^2sin^2\theta...