This is a list of operators in the C and C++ programming languages. All the operators listed exist in C++; the fourth column "Included in C", states whether an operator is also present in C. Note that C does not support operator overloading.
When not overloaded, for the operators &&, ||, and , (the comma operator), there is a sequence point after the evaluation of the first operand.
C++ also contains the type conversion operators const_cast, static_cast, dynamic_cast, and reinterpret_cast. The formatting of these operators means that their precedence level is unimportant.
Most of the operators available in C and C++ are also available in other C-family languages such as C#, D, Java, Perl, and PHP with the same precedence, associativity, and semantics.
Can operators describe a single or many measurements at a single time?
i.e. a stern-gerlach atom deflection experiment where we can measure "up" deflection and "down" deflection or just "up" deflection.
I think I'm pretty confused..
I have some questions about the properties of a Hermitian Operators.
1) Show that the expectaion value of a Hermitian Operator is real.
2) Show that even though \hat{}Q and \hat{}R are Hermitian, \hat{}Q\hat{}R is only hermitian if [\hat{}Q,\hat{}R]=0
Homework Equations
The...
Question: Is the Fourier Transform of a Hermitian operator also Hermitian?
In the case of the density operator it would seem that it is not the case:
\rho(\mathbf{r}) = \sum_{i=1}^N \delta(\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}_i)
\rho_k = \sum_{i=1}^N e^{-i\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}}
I have a hard...
Let's say we have a symmetric potential, in position representation V(x)=V(-x) and let P be the parity operator.
Then quite clearly PV=VP but I was told the stronger statement V=PV is not true, but I thought
V=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} V\left|x\right\rangle\left\langle x \right| dx
(where I...
I hope this is the forum to ask this question.
We all know that the eigenvectors of a Hermitian operator form an orthonormal basis. But is the opposite true as well. Are the vectors of an orthonormal basis always the eigenvectors of some Hermitian operator? Or do we need added restrictions to...
I thought that I had angular momentum very well understood, but something has been giving me problems recently.
It is often stated in textbooks and webpages alike, that the angular momentum ladder operators defined as
J_{\pm} \equiv J_x \pm i J_y
Then the texts often go on to say that these...
I ve been trying to derive this for some time now.
The rule is similar to the one for simple math derivatives.
d/dx(A^B^)=dA^/dx B^ + A^ dB^/dx
Is the derivation on similar lines. Any directions??
Homework Statement
Consider the following operators
a) Reflection: \hat{I}\Psi(x)=\Psi(-x) , x\in(-\infty,\infty)
b) Translation: \hat{T_{a}}\Psi(x)=\Psi(x+a), x\in(-\infty,\infty)
c) \hat{M_{c}}: \hat{M_{c}}\Psi(x) = \sqrt{c}\Psi(x)
d) \hat{c}\Psi(x)= (\Psi(x))^*
e)...
Homework Statement
I understand, mathematically, that the translation operator (both for infinitesimal and finite translations) can be written as a function of the momentum operator. It is said then that momentum "generates" translation. Similiary, the rotation operator can be written as a...
Hello all,
I've been thinking about the connection between commutativity of operators and uncertainty.
I've convinced myself that to have simultaneous eigenstates is a necessary and sufficient condition for two observeables to be measured simultaneously and accurately.
It's also clear...
Homework Statement
Show that if \Omega is an hermitian operator, and \varphi and \psi are (acceptable) wavefunctions, then then
\int \phi^{*} \Omega \psi dz = \int \psi (\Omega \phi)^{*} dz
Homework Equations
Consider the wave function \Psi = \phi + \lambda\psi
The Attempt at a...
Homework Statement
I am trying to learn from Srednicki's QFT book. I am in chapter 2 stuck in problem 2 and 3. This is mainly because I don't know what the unitary operator does - what the details are.
Starting from:
U(\Lambda)^{-1}U(\Lambda')U(\Lambda)=U(\Lambda^{-1}\Lambda'\Lambda)
How does...
I posted this is in the QM section but maybe here would have been better. I don't think it is a hard question for anyone who knows QM:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=181220
The context of this question is chemistry but I think that it contains enough quantum mechanics to warrent posting it here instead of in the chemistry forum.
Go to section 2.1.1 at the following site:
http://tesla.ccrc.uga.edu/publications/papers/qrevbiophys_v33p371.pdf
I am confused...
Why must the ladder operators be
\sqrt{\dfrac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(x+\dfrac{ip}{m\omega}) and
\sqrt{\dfrac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(x-\dfrac{ip}{m\omega})?
What is the method that obtain them from schrodinger Equation?
And why we know that they are creation and anihilation operator?
This is very exciting. I have wondered about this merely as a spectator, because e.g. AFAIK the spinfoam formalism has not confirmed that about the geometric operators. What they say is that discrete spectrum HAS NOT BEEN PROVEN yet for the geometric operators, so it could go either way. Also I...
I'm a newcomer here... so I introduce myself:
I've just completed my BS in physics and joining M.Sc... I've interested to take specialisation in Quantum mechanics and will continue in theoretical physics in the future...
I'm facing problems understanding the algebra of operators...
let be the operator involving an infinite-dimensional ODE
f( \partial _{x}) y(x)=h(x)
then if h(x)=0 i make the ansatz y(x)=e^{ax} so
\sum_{\rho } e^{x\rho} f(\rho) =0
for h(x) different from '0' we construct an orthonormal basis with the solutions given above to give an...
helow guys i am atif elahi from pakistan i have some problem in topic operators in quantum mechanics can you people help me
i shall be very thankful to you thanks
I'm reading an article where there are an atom with two states, let's call them |0> and |1>. Then the writer defines an operator by
|0><1|
I know how this operator works in the bra ket notaion, but how does it work, if I want to use it in the position basis?
Someone told me that I just...
Suppose T: X -> Y and S: Y -> Z , X,Y,Z normed spaces , are bounded linear operators. Is there an example where T and S are not the zero operators but SoT (composition) is the zero operator?
Defining the state | \alpha > such that:
| \alpha > = Ce^{\alpha {\hat{a}}^{\dagger}} | 0 >\ ,\ C \in \mathbf{R};\ \alpha \in \mathbf{C};
Now, | \alpha > is an eigenstate of the lowering operator \hat{a}, isn't it?
In other words, the statement that \hat{a} | \alpha >\ =\ \alpha | \alpha >...
Homework Statement
why is the spectrum of the unitary operator the unit circle?
Homework Equations
i know that U^(-1)=U* and i know this makes U normal
i also know that normal means UU*=U*U
The Attempt at a Solution
i know that from spectral theory there is some lambda in the...
Homework Statement
Prove that any square triangular matrix with each diagonal entry equal to zero is nilpotent
The Attempt at a Solution
Drawing out the matrix and multiplying seems a little tedious. Perhaps there is a better way?
Is there another way to do this without assuming that the...
Homework Statement
It is possibly not a homework problem.However,to do a homework problem,I require this:
Boas writes the effect of Ladder operators on y_n that satisfies
y"_n-x^2y_n=-(2n+1)y_n,n=0,1,2,3...
(D-x)(D+x)y_n=-2ny_n
(D+x)(D-x)y_n=-2(n+1)y_n
Then,she proved...
Here's a question about inequivalent representations of the CCRs...
For a given Hilbert space representation, what is it that determines
which set of field operators \phi(x), or \phi(f) if we want to get
rigorous a la Wightman, gives us THE field operators for that
representation. For example...
I have worked out how the connection coefficients enter into the expression for the Laplacian, for example, in different coordinate systems.
Does anyone have general expressions for how the coefficients enter into other expressions such as divergence and curl and grad and so on?
Thanks in...
Hello ,
This is regarding the equality of nullity between A and PAP(inverse).
If my understanding is correct then the thing should be according to the diagram belowV---------------->R1(isomorphic to V)
| |
| |
\/ \/...
OK, I stumbled upon a problem, but I feel somehow stupid about writing the exact problem down, so I'll ask a more "general" question.
I have to see if three linear operators A, B and C from the vector space of all linear operators from R^2 to R^3 are linearly independent. The mappings are all...
1.What does it mean for an operator to be hermitian?
Note: the dagger is represented by a '
2. How do I show that for any operator ie/ O' that O + O' , i(O-O') and OO' are hermitian?
Thanks in advanced
I am taking a QM course and we are using griffiths intro to QM text, 2nd edition. I like the text but I find it lacking when it comes to explaining ladder operators. I need to see how to use them in a very detailed step-by-step problem. Does anyone know of any good textbooks or websites that...
Homework Statement
Find the matrices which represent the following ladder operators a+,a_, and a+a-
All of these operators are supposed to operate on Hilbert space, and be represented by m*n matrices.
Homework Equations
a+=1/square root(2hmw)*(-ip+mwx)
a_=1/square root(2hmw)*(ip+mwx)...
In my question I have to find what the commutation of a electrons kinetic and potentials energys are, in 3 Dimensions. I have started by finding the kinetic operator T and the potential energy from coloumbs law. I have then applied commutation brackets and I'm at the stage where I'm solving the...
Homework Statement
A is a non-Hermitian operator. Show that
i(A-A^t)
is a Hermitian operator.Homework Equations
\int \psi_1^*\L\psi_2 d\tau=\int (\L\psi_1)^*\psi_2 d\tau
\int \psi_1^*A^t\psi_2 d\tau=\int (A\psi_1)^*\psi_2 d\tauThe Attempt at a Solution
\int \psi_1^*i(A-A^t)\psi_2 d\tau
=\int...
Homework Statement
Within the framework of quantum mechanics, show that the following are Hermitian operators:
a) p=-i\hbar\bigtriangledown
b) L=-i\hbar r\times\bigtriangledown
Hint: In Cartesian form L is a linear combination of noncommuting Hermitian operators.
Homework Equations...
Homework Statement
I've just initiated a self-study on quantum mechanics and am in need of a little help.
The position and momentum operators do not commute. According to my book which attemps to demonstrate this property,
(1) \hat{p} \hat{x} \psi = \hat{p} x \psi = -i \hbar...
Cohen-Tanoudji defines a "standard basis" of the state space as an orthonormal basis {|k,j,m>} composed of eigenvectors common to J² and J_z such that the action of J_± on the basis vectors is given by
J_{\pm}|k,j,m>=\hbar\sqrt{j(j+1)-m(m\pm 1)}|k,j,m\pm 1>
But isn't is automatic that such...
hello everyone,
while studying QM you learn the physical meaning of commutating operators, namely they have simultaneous eigenstates. For observables it means, that they can be simultaneusly exactly mesured.
What is the physical meaning of anticommuting and not anticommuting operators...
Just a quickie:
If two operators commute, what can be said about their eigenfunctions?
The only thing I can glem from the chapter in my textbook about this is that the eigenfunctions are equal? Is this right, or have I misread it?
I know that with an Hermitian operator the expectation value can be found by calculating the (relative) probabilities of each eigenvalue: square modulus of the projection of the state-vector along the corresponding eigenvector.
The normalization of these values give the absolute probabilities...
The general uncertainty relation between two observables A and B.
(\Delta A)^2(\Detla B)^2 \geq -{1\over 4}<[A, B]>^2
I have to prove the above relation using the definition of expection values etc.
The reference I use (Liboff) have this relation given as an exercise. But Gasiorowicz's book...
Homework Statement
Show that for the eigenstate |l,m> of L^2 and Lz, the expectation values of Lx^2 and Ly^2 are <Lx^2>=<Ly^2>=1/2*[l(l+1)-m^2]hbar^2
and for uncertainties, show that deltaLx=deltaLy={1/2*[l(l+1)-m^2]hbar^2}^(0.5)
Homework Equations
eigenvalues of L^2 are l(l+1)hbar^@...
Let be the Kelin-gordon equation (m=0) with a potential so:
(-\frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}+V(x) )\Phi=0
my question is if you consider the wave function above as an operator..is the K-G operator of the form:
<0|T(\Phi(x)\Phi(x')|0> T=time ordered
I think that in both...