The hybrid QM/MM (quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics) approach is a molecular simulation method that combines the strengths of ab initio QM calculations (accuracy) and MM (speed) approaches, thus allowing for the study of chemical processes in solution and in proteins. The QM/MM approach was introduced in the 1976 paper of Warshel and Levitt. They, along with Martin Karplus, won the 2013 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for "the development of multiscale models for complex chemical systems".
Question 1: how is the QM prediction (i.e. cosine curve, shown below) derived for Bell's tests? in layman' termss
Question 2: while Malus's law, some physicists say, is not related to this cosine curve.
Is there an indirect/lengthy way to connect the two...
moseley did experiments on various elements and showed that the frequency of the k-alpha emission was proportional to the square of the proton no.
The formula is (z-1)^2 proportional to the square root of frequency, with the -1 thrown in for the screening effect.
The bohr model can explain...
QM seems something out of our everyday experience and to some it might seem unusual/weird/undeliverable/a hoax...yet... perhaps it actually solves some of the conundrums in classical physics
Does QM solve/resolve a few philosophical issues in Physics?
1) Classical physics says that every event...
The title says it. I would like to see what knowledgeable people at PF have to say about the QM projection postulate -- primarily understandings of the conceptual reasoning underlying it. But anything anyone has to say about it is welcomed, including opinions that it shouldn't be a part of the...
I'm a little bewildered by my recent dive into QM. I don't really understand what's going on. I'm thinking maybe I should study some wave mechanics first before I try QM proper. I'm not really good at math. I make an enormous number of mistakes and I need to be constantly reminded of what to...
Sorry, I have 2 doubts about the EPR paradox.
1) Just check out if I am ok: What EPR proposed was that QM suggest that if two entagled particles, for example photons, prepaired in some special way, get away from each other then:
a) if we measure their x-spin then one particle will get the...
You always hear that GR and QM aren't compatible, but I've never seen an explanation as to why. If I had to guess I would say it's more than quantum mechanics isn't compatible with GR than the other way around, but I really don't know where the conflicts are.
In what sense is QM "not understood"?
This is something that I've seen repeated many times, but I'm wondering how accurate it is. I mean, we've got this mathematical framework where we deal with vector spaces, eigenstates, superpositions, mixed states etc. that works to a high degree of...
Is there a maximum size an object can have above which it won't follow the laws of quantum mechanics anymore? e.g. could the double slit experiment in theory work with macroscopic objects?
Question on the "probabilistic" nature of QM
I read very recently something that I interpreted as stating that certain quantum-mechanical phenomena are necessarily probability-based: for instance the exact path traversed by a photon/electron in the double-slit experiment.
That's all well and...
Many popularized accounts of the development of quantum theory generally go like this:
• Maxwell shows that all electromagnetic radiation is a variant of one phenomenon.
• Experimental results measuring black body radiation are inconsistent with the radiation theory as understood.
• Planck...
My understanding of the main problem with adding gravity to quantum theory is that gravity is proportional to 1/distance squared. And so for particles that have no size (like electrons), their gravity is effectively infinite in a collision. Or in quantum terms, the equations don't converge on...
Do you think Hamilton's principle from classical mechanics can be deduced from Feynman's path integral in quantum mechanics?
(We get across this question in another discussion:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=609087&page=5)
Of course, there is a loose connection, since...
I have a cursory understanding of QM which (as far as I know) fails to provide causation for certain events such as neutron decay and electron leaps to lower orbits. My understanding is that there is (currently) no know "cause" for these, and other, events - they simply happen. We cannot, for...
One of the most frequent questions in this forum is why there is a contradiction between General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. The most frequent answer is that, in high-energy conditions, some integrals diverge, giving nonsense. I could not find a mention of which integrals one is talking...
If you Lorentz transform a scalar:
U^{-1}(\Lambda)\phi(x)U(\Lambda)=\phi(\Lambda^{-1}x)
If you now perform another Lorentz transform, would it it look like this:
U^{-1}(\Lambda')U^{-1}(\Lambda)\phi(x)U(\Lambda)U(\Lambda')=\phi(\Lambda'^{-1}\Lambda^{-1}x) ?
But isn't this wrong...
I watched this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJ0FVez0FSc&list=UU_fHG6JygMd7oIvQ5S_cSIg&index=7&feature=plcp and the guy says that we don't know wether probability is a fundamental description of the particle or wether it is because of our lack of knowledge of the underlying system (ie as...
Hello to everyone,
while solving homework course Nanotechnology and Nanocomponents, I have encountered a problem in FD method that is applied in even potential. In my homework assignment it is explicitly said that it must be done only in x>0 part of the domain, where my problem starts with...
I'm a chemical engineering major and I have to take one of these. Is QM more theory heavy or are they about the same in that regard? I am leaning more towards QM. my only exposure so far has been with the "modern physics" part of general physics
Which is more difficult to understand general relativity or Quantum Mechanics. Neil de Grasse Tyson basically straight-up contradicted himself in a docu on Einstein. In the beginning he said, GR is so complex that only a few people can understand it. At the end he said GR is simple, profound...
I have a good enough grasp of basics of QM at the level of Griffiths and Binney. Anyways, I want to start a more advanced book. I have my heart set at starting one of the following
Dirac's "Principles of QM"
John von Neumann's "Mathematical Foundations of QM"
L. Ballentine's "QM: A Modern...
Homework Statement
The hamiltonian for a given interaction is
H=-\frac{\hbar \omega}{2} \hat{\sigma_y}
where
\sigma_y = \left( \begin{array}{cc} 0 & i \\ -i & 0 \end{array} \right)
the pauli Y matrix
Homework EquationsThe Attempt at a Solution
So from the time dependant schrodinger...
I make way too many mistakes in calc so I'm going to go back and brush up so as to prepare for the exciting moment when I finally start studying QM. I'm using the Thomas text on calc, it's contents are listed below. What sections do you think I should really master. Plus David Griffiths' book...
I want to go about learning quantum mechanics in a way that I can learn it in detail eventually.
And I was wondering if someone could give me some advice or advice for how they learn't it,
should I start learning calculus and the mathematics needed for understanding
it or get one of these...
In Dirac's "The Principles of Quantum Mechanics", in chapter V on the equations of motion Dirac proceeds with a line of reasoning that is something along the following lines (I've modified it a bit to coincide with what's taught in the course I'm taking)
1. We assume that the motion...
I was trying to think of QM in the context of different possible spatial curvatures since the standard cosmology (FRW model) admits at least in principle that 3-space can have positive, negative or no curvature, even if the flat space is favored by the CMB WMAP-COBE observations etc, when I...
Wave functions and their exp(-ipx) are base of quantum mechanics and QFT. But how to derive them the most simply that we will understand why they are base of QM?
It is interesting that Feynman in his book "QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter" very simplifies QED, but he did not give a...
These are the contents of the books I'm going to be reading to prepare myself for Quantum Mechanics. I was wondering if there any chapters that are not really necessary to learn. For instance, in studying Calculus it seems unlikely to me that infinite series will every be useful, though I...
Consider one particle traveling at a relativistic velocity in 3-space. Then the configuration space of the system consisting of that one particle would have 3 degrees of freedom – 1 particle times 3 dimensions.
Because of its high energy, the particle decays into, say, 2 particles. Now the...
If your major is basically going to be mechanical engineering, but you take electives that have to do with physics.. would those electives help you do MS in Quantum mechanics easily?
Which and why do you believe will turn out to be more 'fundamental' (in the sense that one will prove to be the foundation of a theory which goes beyond the SM, while the other will be explained away by it). Or maybe both, or neither?
Whats the difference between Many Worlds Interpretation and Relational QM. Here is what I understand in few words:
MWI: The whole universe system evolves with Schrodinger Equation without Quantum Collapse, but when a subsystem interacts with other subsystem, it seems like Quantum Collapse...
Dear forumers,
I have a question about taking direct sums and products of state spaces in QM. Picture I have a state space that describes two (indistinguishable) particles which is a direct sum of two one-particles spaces:
\epsilon_t = \epsilon_1 \oplus \epsilon_2
Furthermore, picture that...
Couple noob questions.
1.What is quantum mechanical definition of an observer?
2.Why is looking at the double slit experiment with your eyes while the electron goes through any different than a camera looking? Each one is looking, one can just see better. Is it the fact that the outcome...
Hi folks. I'm wondering who does a good job of explaining this limit, preferably with a good set of examples. It doesn't need to be too basic, but it'd be nice if it went through the phase space stuff a little (I get the impression that my grad prof didn't do a great job with some details based...
Hi,
I am trying to get a few fundamental concepts sorted out in my mind associated with the maths of non-commutative operators and the physical implications on QM. As such, I am simply looking for confirmation, clarification or corrections to any of the following issues.
One of the most...
In relativity, things like gravity are suppose to be time frame independent, i.e. even if time stopped they would still exist frozen as they did before since a gravitational field instantaneously correlates over the distance it covers.
However, in the new standard model, forces like gravity are...
I am currently in my second undergraduate quantum course and just finished studying the addition of angular momenta. I am also in my third abstract algebra course and am now covering product groups and group actions. In my QM book (griffiths) there was a reference made to group theory. it said "...
Hi
Consider a small system A which is described by quantum mechanics. A large system B is surrounding A and this large system is described by classical physics.
What kind of interactions has the system B to the small qm system?
Compared to B is A very small so I guess one can neglect...
I'm wondering whether physicists in the 1930's ever had experimental reason to interpret, for example, Schrödinger's cat, as a true paradox (because of the role of a human observer). Why didn't they default to Bohr's interpretation, that an interaction with a geiger-counter, or any classically...
Hello there,
I was reading an article on wiki about the Breit equation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breit_equation
And I'm having a hard time understanding a few thing about this equation. The first thing is that, from what I can gather, the Breit Hamiltonian is basically a Dirac...
Homework Statement
Hi
In QM we define the force operator F as (in the Heisenberg picture)
F = \frac{1}{i\hbar}[p, H] + (d_t F)(t)
What I can't understand is that usually (actually, always) we write
F = \frac{1}{i\hbar}[p, H]
and neglegt the last time derivative. How can we be so certain...
According to Peterdonis in an old thread
According to Matterwave in https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=573589 msg #11:
Peterdonis said Time is a parameter in non-relativistic QM while as a coordinate in relativistic QM/QFT. But Matterwave said parameter and coordinate has...
Hi,
I'm looking for a QM mechanics book, which I could use for review and reference. I've took 3 QM courses, the first two was based on Cohen-tannoudji and Sakurai, and the third was about atoms and molecules etc. , although I haven't studied scattering theory and relativistic QM/QFT. (I took...
hello there, i need a place or a book where i can learn the mathematics of QM.
I am having trouble with linear operators and matrix formulation.
Like how do you represent an operator? How can one jump between operators and then back to matrix formulation.
I NEED THE BASICS!
Thanks!
Homework Statement
http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/224/32665300.png
The Attempt at a Solution
http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/2920/scan0003xo.jpg
I've uploaded my work so far since its much faster than typing and I'm stuck on the last line trying to solve the integral.
The first...
For example let's look at a single particle, double slit experiment:
we know that the particle (photon/electron) will land up on one of the fringes. however it is commonly understood that we cannot predict which of the fringes will it land up on.
one could argue that since there was...
Feynman said that " [the double slit int. pattern contains] the only mystery in QM"
was quantum entanglement not established (and bells theorem not postulated) then yet?
or did Feynman believe that the explanation for the double slit (interference pattern) would also somehow explain...