In physics, a redshift is an increase in the wavelength, and corresponding decrease in the frequency and photon energy, of electromagnetic radiation (such as light). The opposite change, a decrease in wavelength and simultaneous increase in frequency and energy, is known as a negative redshift, or blueshift. The terms derive from the colours red and blue which form the extremes of the visible light spectrum.
In astronomy and cosmology, the three main causes of electromagnetic redshift are
The radiation travels between objects which are moving apart ("relativistic" redshift, an example of the relativistic Doppler effect)
The radiation travels towards an object in a weaker gravitational potential, i.e. towards an object in less strongly curved (flatter) spacetime (gravitational redshift)
The radiation travels through expanding space (cosmological redshift). The observation that all sufficiently distant light sources show redshift corresponding to their distance from Earth is known as Hubble's law.Relativistic, gravitational, and cosmological redshifts can be understood under the umbrella of frame transformation laws. Gravitational waves, which also travel at the speed of light, are subject to the same redshift phenomena.
Examples of strong redshifting are a gamma ray perceived as an X-ray, or initially visible light perceived as radio waves. Subtler redshifts are seen in the spectroscopic observations of astronomical objects, and are used in terrestrial technologies such as Doppler radar and radar guns.
Other physical processes exist that can lead to a shift in the frequency of electromagnetic radiation, including scattering and optical effects; however, the resulting changes are distinguishable from (astronomical) redshift and are not generally referred to as such (see section on physical optics and radiative transfer).
The value of a redshift is often denoted by the letter z, corresponding to the fractional change in wavelength (positive for redshifts, negative for blueshifts), and by the wavelength ratio 1 + z (which is >1 for redshifts, <1 for blueshifts).
...With Galaxy Explorer 2.0
Hi!
I'm doing some personal reaserch on Sloan Digital Sky Survey, and I was wondering if anyone here uses this software?
If so, could you tell me what the center is?
For details of the SDSS project check the websites:
GalaxyExplorer: a 3D...
I read this recently, but did not understand how one calculates this, since I'm used to:
Distance = Recessional Velociy / Hubble's Constant
= Beta x C / Hubble's Constant
ALSO SEE ATTACHMENT
I thought that as Z approaches infinity, Recessional Velociy approaches C...
Hi, what is the highest redshift observed for any 'object' in the Universe?
Also, is the Abell-lensed 'object' still viewed as a possible candidate (at Z=10) or have people further studied this lensed 'object' and determined its high redshift as an error?
Thanks you.
How would one use hubble's law to find the redshift of a galaxy 10^10 light years away? (in other words 3*10^9 pc)
All I know however is the version of hubble's where v=H_o d, with H_o=71 \frac{m}{s*pc}, which tells me that v= 2.2*10^11 m/s. But this violates the second principle of...
The gravitational redshift to light at emission is known
as the Einstein shift.
There is a problem with it in General Relativity.
It becomes infinite at the surface of a black hole.
Light emitted there will be infinitely redshifted.
GR predicts this energyless light. In this way
as...
In order to quell complaints from those members of the board who feel they are being discriminated against in my recent threads, I would like to directly address the issue of a non-cosmological interpretation of redshift. If you're a layman trying to learn about astronomy, I advise you to...
I think the cosmological redshift, called the "Hubble" redshift which Edwin Hubble discovered and photographed, is caused by quantum decay in light and other electric field) waves, i.e. photoelectric radiation. When emitted, light from a particular elements electronic transitions are at the...
Hi i am confused as to how to calculate the age of the universe with redshift
say for example
The age of the universe now is 13 billion years old (and a critical universe).
How do i find the age of the universe if it was a redshift at say 10??
Do i have to find the scale factor first?
I...
generic redshift is characterised (defined) by z = (L-L0)/L0 where L is the wavelength at time of absorption (detection), and L0 was the wavelength at time of emission.
for Doppler redshift z = v/c for small (non-relativistic) values of v.
assuming the universe is expanding, I've read...
Hello
I have been reading a textbook on cosmology and have come up against a self test question I just can't crack! Any help would be greatly appreciated:
"The Cosmological redshift of a quasar is normally deduced from its emission lines. Let this redshift be ze. Suppose the quasar has...
Interestingly, the SDSS interactive learning site
http://cas.sdss.org/dr3/en/
lists NGC 7603 and PGC 07041 as an interacting pair of galaxies, although their redshifts are very different.
Go to the page below and find the image of NGC 7603 and PGC 07041. Click on the image to use the...
I'm a college freshman at the moment, so perhaps I'm just missing something simple. But none of my professors can give me an actual answer.
If photons of light from distant galaxies undergo redshift because of the expanding universe.
Also since particles have a wavelength according to...
I have been reading about Loop Quantum Gravity and about Spin Foam, and I am stuck on a (probably stupid) idea. It seems that one of the underpinnings of these concepts is that space-time is quantized in discrete units at the Planck scale. If space-time is quantized and the universe is...
cosmological constant = lambda
rho = mass density of dark energy
lambda = constant x rho
rho = lambda / constant
rho x volume of universe = lamda / constant x volume of universe = total mass of dark energy in universe
volume of universe = lambda / constant x total mass of dark...
I have been reading in astrophysics that when light escapes a massive object its being slowed down by its gravity, but since it can't be slowed down its being redshifted. now in our high school physics books it says that light takes a diffrent path when its being slowed down when entering aother...
If light experiences gravitational redshift as said by GR, then, where did the difference between the initial and final energy, E = \frac {hc}{\lambda} go?
From Hubble expansion, there is also redshift. Where did the energy difference go?
In my last Cosmology class, the professor explained how the expansion of the universe increase the wavelength of the light. But his explanation was a non-local one, I mean, you need to compare the time beween two wavecrests to determine that the light was redshifted. The explanation was that the...
All other issues aside, a mathemetician who is asked to explain cosmological redshift (more distant objects regularly appear redshifted) could easily come up with a couple of reasons:
1) the universe is expanding rapidly in all directions, and the light from distant galaxies is redshifted due...
If photons get redshifted on their way to the Earth by transferring
energy to the dark energy of the cosmos their momenta would not be
changed and cause blurring of objects because dark energy may not have momentum itself and so classical behaviour that would cause blurring would not...
As I understand it, light will be redshifted when it travels from a large ( gravitationally speaking ) object to us. It will also be redshifted if the object is moving away from us. How do we know how much of the redshift is due to either effect ? :confused:
when we use redshift to determine direction, velocity of distant radiation sources do we not take into account the redshift due to gravitational forces?
that is, if gravitational fields can lengthen wavelengths of light (as well as bend them) wouldn't more distant objects like far off...
I came across Ned Wright's webpage
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/tiredlit.htm which states that
alternative explanations for the redshift of galaxies would not be
consistent with the z-dependence of supernova lightcurves. However,
this assertion is not further substantiated and as far as...
quote:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by shrumeo
... there has to be other data besides redshifting to confirm the expansion of the universe. I'd hate to know that so much theory is built on one type of data point...
Having only just learned of the existence of this board I feel that I should make use of it as i spend most of my free time working on seemingly useless theories, might as well see what others think.
I have read a little on gravitational redshift but have never really understood the theory...
Redshift = expansion??
I'm not a physicist so I'll probably be laughed at for asking this.
I understand the concepts of redshift and the Doppler effect being used to substantiate the hypothesis that the universe is expanding, indeed accelerating, since the farther an object is the higher its...
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0203466
We present new spectroscopic observations of an old case of anomalous redshift--NGC 7603 and its companion. The redshifts of the two galaxies which are apparently connected by a luminous filament are z=0.029 and z=0.057 respectively. We show that in the...
Within the framework of General Relativity in one of its most simple forms, the Schwarzschild solution, a very interesting paradox can be proposed involving the conservation of work / energy. It’s a puzzle for the Relativity buff. In this short discussion I outline this energy redshift paradox...
About Time!
This paper has such a obvious ring of truth about it, one can only hope that the misconceptions are finally laid to rest, and we can move forward, for there is Relativistic change in the air.
http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310808
Here is an interesting paragraph:In special...
We have a theoretical issue here.
There is a misconception floating around PF about the relation of the cosmological redshift to present and past recession velocity.
If a redshift is Doppler in origin then in the context of Special Relativity one has Einstein's correction of the Doppler...
In the cosmol. redshift thread (Q) asked
[[I would like to hear some interpretations of this phenomenon, especially in regards to what happens to the energy of photons in cosmological redshift – where do YOU think it goes? Is it lost or is it conserved?]]
It is clear that a whole lot of...
I would like to hear some interpretations of this phenomenon, especially in regards to what happens to the energy of photons in cosmological redshift – where do YOU think it goes? Is it lost or is it conserved?