Use the riemann sums model to estimate the area under the curve f(x) = x^2, between x =2 and x = 10, using an infinite number of strips. Be sure to include appropriate diagriams and full explanation of the method of obtaining all numerical values, full working and justification.
Does anybody...
Homework Statement
let f:[0,oo) -> R be given by f(x) = sin(x) / x for x>0 and f(0) = c. Prove that f is improper riemann integrable without computing the integral explicitly
The Attempt at a Solution
I've attempted to find a upperbound for f(x) such that the integral does not diverge...
I was wondering if anyone could tell me more about the Riemann Zeta function, esp at negative values. Especially when \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}n= \frac{-1}{12} R where R is the Ramanujan Summation Operator. Could anyone post a proof?
Homework Statement
Find the Riemann sum associated with f(x)=3 x^2 +3 ,\quad n=3 and the partition
x_0=0,\quad x_1=3,\quad x_2=4,\quad x_3=6,\qquad \mbox{ of } [0,6]
(a) when x_k^{*} is the right end-point of [x_{k-1},x_k]. .
(b) when x_k^{*} is the mid-point of [x_{k-1},x_k]...
Is there ever a situation where it is more appropriate/advantageous to use Riemann summation as opposed to evaluating an integral, or is Riemann summation merely taught in order to help the student to understand what's going on?
Hello,
I am doing a project on Riemann but I don't understand some of his contributions. For instance, I do not understand what Riemann zeta-function measures or what it does, what the Riemann hypothesis states, or what the difference is between Riemannian geometry and hilbert geometry. Any...
For what values of p>0 does the series
Riemann Sum [n=1 to infinity] 1/ [n(ln n) (ln(ln n))^p]
converge and for what values does it diverge?
How do i do this question? Would somebody please kindly show me the steps? Do i use the intergral test?
The cauchy Riemann relations can be written:
\frac{\partial f}{\partial \bar{z}}=0
Is there an 'easy to see reason' why a function should not depend on the independent variable [itex]\bar{z}[/tex] to be differentiable?
Hello, just going through some Riemann sum problems before I hit integrals and I am like 99% sure that this answer from my text is wrong but I want to make sure. It's not really an important question so if you have better things to do, help the next guy :) But checking this over would be...
"Riemann zeta function"...generalization..
Hello my question is if we define the "generalized" Riemann zeta function:
\zeta(x,s,h)= \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(x+nh)^{-s}
which is equal to the usual "Riemann zeta function" if we set h=1, x=0 ,then my question is if we can extend the definition...
Can anyone tell me if Riemann's Prime Counting function can be solved by residue integration?
Here it is:
J(x)=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{c-i\infty}^{c+i\infty}\frac{ln(\zeta(s))x^s}{s}ds
which has the solution:
J(x)=li(x)-\sum_{\rho}li(x^\rho)-ln(2)+
\int_x^{\infty}\frac{dt}{t(t^2-1)ln(t)}
I...
In a book of mine, the author proceeds to the proof that a Riemann sum in a interval [a,b] must converge by proving that for S_m and S_n (m>n) where the span of the subdivisions is suffiencienly small, then
|S_m - S_n)| < e(b-a)
Where e can assume infinitly small values in dependence of...
Let H_{n}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{k} be the nth harmonic number, then the Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to proving that for each n\geq 1,
\sum_{d|n}d\leq H_{n}+\mbox{exp}(H_{n})\log H_{n}
where equality holds iff n=1. The paper that this came from is here: An Elementary Problem...
Hi, maybe someone can help. When I think about it, I'm pretty sure that the following is true: Let c be a curve parametrized by t\in [a,b], let \sigma = \{t_0,...,t_N\} be a partition of [a,b] and \delta_{\sigma}=\max_{0\leq k \leq N-1}(t_{k+1}-t_k). Also define \Delta t_k=t_{k+1}-t_k Then...
Use the Riemann sum and a limit to evaluate the exact area under the graph of y = 2x^2 + 4 on [0, 1]
I know how to do this normally but now they ask to do it w/ a limit and I'm not sure how.
(LaTex corrected by HallsofIvy.)
Given a function f: [0,1] \to \mathbb{R}. Suppose f(x) = 0 if x is irrational and f(x) = 1/q if x = p/q, where p and q are relatively prime.
Prove that f is Riemann integrable.
A doubt..why einstein Chose Riemann Tensor for GR?..i know its covariant derivative is zero and all that..but Why Riemann tensor?...was not other tensor avaliable or simpler than that?..i studied that and found that for Geodesic deviation ( i didn,t understand that concept..sorry) the Riemann...
I was hoping someone could check my answer?
Use the limit of a Riemann sum to find the area of the region bounded by the graphs of y=2x^3+1, y=0, x=0, x=2.
Area=2
let \zeta(z)=\sum_{n \in \mathbb{N}} n^{-z} ~ {{a+ib}}>1
then, \zeta(z)=0 iff z=-2n where n is a natural number.
pi(x)=\int_0^\infty\frac{dx}{\xS[x+1]} gamma(x+)
where S[x+1]= \sum_{n \in \mathbb{N}} n^-{x+1}
I have discovered that pi(x)=\int_a^b\frac{dx}/logx = 1/log b+ 2/log b...
They claim that the trivial 0s (zeta(z)=0) occur when z is a negative odd integer (with no imaginary component). But it seems obviously wrong.
Take z=-2
zeta(-2)=1+1/(2^-2)+1/(3^-2)...
=1+4+9...
Obviously this series will not equal 0.
Where have I gone wrong?
Have I misunderstood...
hi, is it possible to find the riemann sum of (cos1)^x?
it looks divergent to me
can someome please help me... even if it is convergent, i don't know how to find the sum of a trigonometric function
Is it possible to show by induction that f:[a,b]->R, a bounded function, is Riemann integrable if f has a countable number of discontinuities? I'm told this is usually done with Lebesgue integrals, but I don't see why an inductive proof of this using Riemann/Darboux integrals can't work.
"Let (r_n) be any list of rational numbers in [0,1]. Let (a_n) be a sequence such that 1>a_1>a_2>...>a_n>... converging to 0. Let f be defined such that
f=0 if x is irrational
=a_n if x is equal to r_x
Prove that f is Riemann integrable."
We are doing integrals from Darboux' approach, so no...
Let f:[a,b]->R be bounded. Further, let it be continuous on [a,b] except at points a1, a2, ...,an,... such that a1>a2>a3>...>an>...> a where an converges to a. Prove that f is Riemann integrable on [a,b].
It suffices to prove that f is integrable on [a,a1) (I've worked out that part). And...
Problem states:
(A) Use mathematical induction to prove that for x\geq0 and any positive integer n.
e^x\geq1+x+\frac{x^2}{2!}+...+\frac{x^n}{n!}
(B) Use part (A) to show that e>2.7.
(C) Use part (A) to show that
\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} \frac{e^x}{x^k} =...
This problem is in the section of my book called "The Natural Logarithmic Function" so I am guessing that I would have to use a natural log somewhere...but anyways...the problem says:
For what values of m do the line y=mx and the curve y=\frac{x}{(x^2+1)} enclose a region? Find the area of the...
I always wonder how the definitions of curvatures of curves and surfaces be unified by the Riemann Tensor symbols.
For surfaces, I know R_{1,2,1,2} corresponds to the Gaussian curvature of a surface. How come R_{1,1,1,1}=0 and not corresponds to the curvature of a curve in \RE^2 or in \Re^3...
How do i find the number of independent components of the Riemann curvature tensor in D space-time dimensions.
One is given that the Riemann tensor is an (2,2) irreducible rep of GL(4, \mathbb{R}) and obeys Bianchi I
R_{[\mu\nu|\rho]\lambda}=0
Been trying this problem for 3 days and...
I know this is one of the famous unsolved problems still hanging around. Could someone give me the "gist" of it, and what the implications are if it is solved one way or the other? I looked it up on Wikipedia but that didn't help me much. Has anyone any idea why it is so hard to solve (i imagine...
Please Help... Riemann
Please Help!
To compute the Riemann integral of f:[0,1]->R given f(x)=x^k where k>1 is an integer
1. Let m>2 and define q_m= m^(-1/m) Let P_m be the partition of [0,1] given by P_m=(0< q_m^m < q_m^(m-1)< ...< q_m <1)
Explicitly evalute L(f,P_m) and U(f,P_m)
2. Show...
Heilbronn proved that the Epstein Zeta function did not satisfy RH...but the Zeta function \zeta(s) can be put in a form of an Epstein function but a factor k..let be the functional equation for Epstein functions:
\pi^{-s}\Gamma(s)Z_{Q^{-1}}(s)=|Q|^{1/2}\pi^{s-n/2}\Gamma(n/2-s)Z_{Q}(n/2-s)...
So it is well-known that for n=2,3,... the following equation holds
\zeta(n)=\int_{x_{n}=0}^{1}\int_{x_{n-1}=0}^{1}\cdot\cdot\cdot\int_{x_{1}=0}^{1}\left(\frac{1}{1-\prod_{k=1}^{n}x_{k}}\right)dx_{1}\cdot\cdot\cdot dx_{n-1}dx_{n}
My question is how can this relation be extended to...
to publish it because i,m not a famous teacher,mathematician from a snob and pedant univesity of Usa of England...this is the way science improves..only by publishing works from famous mathematician..:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: o fcourse if i were Louis de Branges or Alain Connes or other...
let f(x) = 1 when x in in [0,1)
f(x) = -1/2 when x is in [1,2)
f(x) = 1/3 when x is in [2, 3)
and so on, in othe words its the sequence (1/n)(-1)^n, whose series obviously converges to log 2. However is f(x) Riemann integrable and equal to this series?
If so, how to give an...
I've tried my best to understand the Riemann Zeta Function on my own, but I appeal to the knowledge of you guys to help me understand more.
For s >1 , the Riemann Zeta Fuction is defined as:
\zeta(s)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}n^{-s}
I have no problem with this. That series obviously converges...
this is a question i have i mean are RH and Goldbach conjecture related? i mean in the sense that proving RH would imply Goldbach conjecture and viceversa:
RIemann hypothesis: (RH)
\zeta(s)=0 then s=1/2+it
Goldbach conjecture,let be n a positive integer then:
2n=p1+p2 ...
Let be the Hamitonian of a particle with mass m in the form:
H=\frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m}D^{2}\phi(x)+V(x)\phi(x)
then the RH is equivalent to prove that exist a real potential V(x) of the Hamiltonian so that the values E_n H\phi=E_{n}\phi satisfy the equation \zeta(1/2+iE_{n})=0 that is...
Summary of the classical proof by Riemann and Roch
Let D = p1 + ...+pd be a divisor of distinct points on a compact connected Riemann surface X of genus g, and let L(D) be the space of meromorphic functions on X with at worst simple poles contained in the set {p1,...,pd}. For each point pj...
let be the quotient:
Lim_{x->c}\frac{\zeta(1-x)}{\zeta(x)}
where x=c is a root of riemann function... then my question is if that limit is equal to exp(ik) with k any real constant...thanks... the limit is wehn x tends to c bieng c a root of riemann constant
Hi,
When I hear about the Riemann hypothesis, it seems like the first thing I hear about it is its importance to the distribution of prime numbers. However, looking online this seems to be a very difficult thing to explain. I understand that the Riemann Hypothesis asserts that the zeroes of...
hello all
well I was working through Riemanns Criterion :
let f be a bounded function on the closed interval [a,b]. then f is riemann integrable on [a,b] if and only if , given any epsilon>0, there exist a partition P of [a,b] such that U(f,P)-L(f,P)<epsilon
but there is one thing that...
hello all
i just wanted to ask how would one prove that a function is riemann integrable through the definition that the lower integral has to equal the upper integral, an example on the function f(x)=x^2 would be of great help
thanxs
hello all
after doing a bit of research on the riemann hypothesis I came along this paragraph, in which I don't understand, especially the first sentence , how would one be able to show that?
It can be shown that \zeta (s) = 0 when s is a negative even integer. The famous Riemann...
http://news.uns.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/2004/040608.DeBranges.Riemann.html
Any news since then? There are links to the papers themselves on the bottom of the page. But I can't understand much, I'm afraid.
I have read what MathWorld has to offer on this and I am extremely confused. Could someone please explain this as simply as possible? Or then again maybe MathWorld already did that. Also, why is this function so important?
Many thanks,
Jameson
Hello guys, I am following the chapter about multiple Riemann integrals in Apostol's Mathematical Analysis. Theorem 14.11 says this (I translate from spanish to english):
"Let S be a Jordan measurable set. Let the function f be defined and bounded in S. Then f is Riemann integrable if and...
How does the difference quotient undo what the Riemann sum does or vice versa. In terms of the two formulas?
I would assume that working a difference quotient backwards would be similar to working a Riemann sum forward, but in reality as the operations go this couldn't be further from the...