In physics, the special theory of relativity, or special relativity for short, is a scientific theory regarding the relationship between space and time. In Albert Einstein's original treatment, the theory is based on two postulates:
The laws of physics are invariant (that is, identical) in all inertial frames of reference (that is, frames of reference with no acceleration).
The speed of light in vacuum is the same for all observers, regardless of the motion of the light source or observer.
I kinda know how to do this problem, it is just that I hit a sign problem. If I take the partial derivative of the coordinate transformation with respect to ##x'^\mu##, I get
writing it first in the inverse form, ##x^\alpha = x'^\alpha - \epsilon^\alpha##
##\frac{\partial x^\alpha}{\partial...
Hi,
I read various threads in PF about the concept of invariant speed and the speed of light in vacuum that in our universe happens to be the same as the 'invariant speed'.
My doubt is about the speed of the light in vacuum as measured from a non-inertial frame (basically in the context of SR...
Hello everyone!
Let's say that you were to attempt to go as fast as possible on a spaceship with the mass of an average car in an absolute perfect vacuum. What I am wondering is, that if you were to reach a certain speed, and stop applying energy to this imagined spaceship, would the spaceship...
Einstein's synchrony convention (ESC) defines the one-way speed of light as equal to the roundtrip speed IN A VACUUM, at least, the discussions and papers I read on it (even Einstein's 1905 paper) always seem to set the context as in space (a near vacuum) or in a (theoretical) vacuum. I'm...
Generally speaking, when a simple contraction occurs there is a contraction point. Length contraction in special relativity appears to be a simple contraction, and hence there should be a contraction point. Where is this contraction point located?
As per special theory of relativity, no inertial reference frame is special! If a spaceship is moving at 100 m/s, no one can conduct an experiment to determine whether it is moving at 100 m/s or the rest of the universe is moving to the opposite direction at -100 m/s, if I understand the...
I am trying to answer exercise 5 but I am not sure I understand what the hint is implying, differentiate with respect to ##p_\alpha## and ##p_\beta##, I have done this but nothing is clicking. Also, what is the relevance of the hint "the constraint ##p^\alpha p_\alpha = m^2c^2## can be ignored...
I'm reading the online version of a book that says
Rindler observer comes right into my mind when I read this. So I think the book is wrong. What do you all think?
On a second guess, perhaps the author takes the view that SR is only for constant speeds in the same sense that one could say that...
Since ##\nu## is contracted, we form the scalar product of the metric and inverse metric,
##g_{\mu\nu}g^{\nu\lambda} = (\vec{e_\mu} \cdot \vec{e_\nu}) \cdot (\vec{e^\nu} \cdot \vec{e^\lambda}) = \vec{e_\mu} \cdot (\vec{e_\nu} \cdot \vec{e^\nu}) \cdot \vec{e^\lambda} = \delta^\lambda_\mu##
I...
If time slows as an object increases velocity wouldn't that indicate that time is object specific? And if the speed of light is a constant and does not change regardless of the velocity of an object wouldn't that indicate that time used to measure the speed of light changes? The video I have...
first off hi all. Just joined, i was looking for someone to help me understand time dilation and spatial contraction in relativity. its not homework just something i was watching, very good btw, but left me with some contradictory information as i see it. if anyone with any level of expertise at...
Ok, I hope someone can help me see how to sort this out.
Alice has a full-frame (no rolling shutter) video camera that records exactly 30 frames per second. It's mounted to a telescope looking far out into space.
Bob is out there in space with a digital clock that reads out to the millisecond...
I have read many GR books and many posts regarding the title of this post, but despite that, I still feel the need to clarify some things.
Based on my understanding, the contravariant component of a vector transforms as,
##A'^\mu = [L]^\mu~ _\nu A^\nu##
the covariant component of a vector...
What is the difference between special relativity and the Lorentz transformation? Aren't they basically the same thing?
Also, I was wondering what about matter makes spacetime curve?
Since it is stated that ##E'_x = E_x##, I am going to set a special case where ##z' = z = 0##, ##E_x## in (5.10) reduces to,
##E_x = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{x^2}##
However, ##E'_x## in (5.13) reduces to,
##E'_x = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{\gamma^2 x'^2}##
There is an...
So, here's an attempted solution:
With ##r_{min}##,
$$r_{min} = \frac{1}{B + \frac{\beta}{\alpha^2}}$$
With ##r_{max}##,
I get:
$$r_{max} = \frac{1}{B - \frac{\beta}{\alpha^2}}$$
or
$$r_{max} = \frac{1}{\frac{\beta}{\alpha^2}}$$
Other than this, I and the team have absolutely no idea on how...
Show that, according to relativistic physics, the final velocity ##v## of a rocket accelerated by its rocket motor in empty space is given by
##\frac{M_i}{M} = \Big ( \frac{c+v}{c-v} \Big) ^ \frac{c}{2 v_{ex}}##
where ##M_i## is the initial mass of the rocket at launch (including the fuel)...
Below, I have already solved - I assume - correctly for question 1. Question 2, I am nearing to what I believe is the solution. Question 3, I simply have no idea where I should begin considering that it is interconnected with question 2.
With that said, below is the lengthy and somewhat tedious...
Hey guys,
My question is a bit confusing:
When we observe a train moving close to the speed of light, passing by the platform, according to the frame of reference in the platform, the clocks in the train are ticking slower than the clocks in the platform itself. According to the frame of...
I'm struggling to get the hang of killing vectors. I ran across a statement that said energy in special relativity with respect to a time translation Killing field ##\xi^{a}## is: $$E = -P_a\xi^{a}$$ What exactly does that mean? Can someone clarify to me?
To begin with, I posted this thread ahead of time simply because I thought it may provide me some insight on how to solve for another problem that I have previously posted here: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/special-relativity-test-particle-inside-suns-gravitational-field.983171/unread...
Below is an attempted solution based off of another user's work on StackExchange:
Source: [https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/525169/special-relativity-test-particle-inside-the-suns-gravitational-field/525212#525212]
To begin with, I will be using the following equation mentioned in...
Two four-vectors have the property that ##A^\mu B_\mu = 0##
(a) Suppose ##A^\mu A_\mu > 0##. Show that ##B^\mu B_\mu \leq 0##
(b) Suppose ##A^\mu A_\mu = 0##. Show that ##B^\mu## is either proportional to ##A^\mu## (that is, ##B^\mu = k A^\mu##) or else ##B^\mu B_\mu < 0##.
Part (a) is...
Right, so I thought I'd done this correctly but clearly not because my velocity is greater than the speed of light, where have I gone wrong?
P = (M, 0, 0, 0)
p1 = (E1, p1x, p1y, p1z)
p2 = (E2, p2x, p2y, p2z)
P = p1 + p2
p2 = P - p1
square each side
to get (p2)2 = P2 - 2Pp1 + p12
therefore
(m2)2...
I've tried using gammamc^{2} = E1 + E2 but how do i find gamma?? If i try to use the kinetic energy then I just get gammamv^2 = 1gev but i don't know v? very confused
In A.P. French's Special Relativity, the author said the following,
As I understand, photons are massless, so I don't think the last equation above applies to photons, but then, when deriving it, he used an equation proper to photons (##E=pc##).
So in which context is ##m=p/c## valid?
[Note from mentor: this was originally posted in a non-homework forum, so it lacks the homework template.]
Summary:: Special relativity problems. More details below
The formula for speed for special relativity is
V = (u-v) / (1-u*v) / (c^2)
Here the book...
Happy new year, I got very far in this question. I attempted to use conservation of energy first.
Ei=(Pfc)^2+mec^2 Where pf is the initial momentum of the photons
Ef=(γmec^2)+(pf'c)^2
Then used conservation of momentum
Pf=γmvcos(Θ)
Pf'=-γmvsin(Θ).
After that I added Pf and Pf'.
and used...
According to the 2nd postulate of Special Relativity, speed of light in vacuum is the same in all inertial reference frames.
If I take a beam of photons and see the other photons in the beam from a frame of reference of a single photon, do they look stationary or moving at the speed of light...
I'm interested in the history of thought that led to the discovery of special relativity.
Of all the equations in special relativity, e.g. the equation for the invariant interval, the equation for gamma, the Lorentz transformation equations, the equation for velocity addition, etc., which one...
## \ \ \ \ \ ##In ##K##,System ##M## is composed of a spring ## N ## and four particles ## P, Q, A and B ##. The ends of spring ## N ## are fixedly connected with particles ## P and Q ## respectively. Particle ## A ## is adjacent to particle ## P ##, and particle ## B ## is adjacent to particle...
This is my first thread. I hope I do it right. I just started reading the book Special Relativity by W.Rindler. And as I was reading it, I stumbled upon a pickle. So in Lorentz theory, it says, supposedly we could measure the original to-and-fro time T2 directly with a clock, and suppose we...
[Moderator's note: Thread spun off from previous thread due to topic change.]
Thanks! I am working on understanding why non-local effects violate the special theory of relativity. I am not there yet, but maybe when I finally get there I will leave the BM train.
Recently, I've been studying about Lorentz boosts and found out that two perpendicular Lorentz boosts equal to a rotation after a boost. Below is an example matrix multiplication of this happening:
$$
\left(
\begin{array}{cccc}
\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}} & 0 & -\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 0 & 0...
A problem of an isolated system's velocity in different inertial systems, in special relativity
##\ \ \ \ \ ## In the inertial reference frame ##K##, the velocity of each component of an isolated system in ## x## direction is zero at a certain time.
##\ \ \ \ \ ## The inertial reference frame...
[BEGINNGING NOTICE]
Before I begin showing my attempted solution, I would just like to quickly mention that this is a "repost" of the same question I had around a week ago. While I would usually use the "reply" function on the same thread, I believe that thread is getting pretty messy (sometimes...
Below is the attempted solution after researching the contents available on Introduction to Electrodynamics by Griffith.
To begin with, I defined the rod as having a length of ##l'## at rest in frame ##S'##. Thus, in frame ##S'##, the height of the rod is ##l' sin(\theta ')## and its horizontal...
"My" Attempted Solution
To begin, please note that a lot - if not all - of the "solution" is largely based off of @eranreches's solution from the following website: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/369352/scalar-invariance-under-lorentz-transformation.
With that said, below is my...
Summary: The problem is to generalize the Lorentz transformation to two dimensions.
Relevant Equations
Lorentz Transformation along the positive x-axis:
$$ \begin{pmatrix}
\bar{x^0} \\
\bar{x^1} \\
\bar{x^2} \\
\bar{x^3} \\
\end{pmatrix} =
\begin{pmatrix}
\gamma & -\gamma \beta & 0 & 0 \\...
with distance between planets as 4x10^8m measured by you on the ship
My attempt:
t' = γ(t - ux/c^2)
γ = 5/3
u = 0.8c
t = 0.9s
x = 4x10^8m
answer is: -0.278
Therefore not possible
My question is what if we traveled rightwards, from p2 to p1, would the answer change?
Should my above information...
Unfortunately, I am not entirely confident of the above equations being able to do the trick and ultimately solve for the question. However, my guess is that using the equation written above for "boost", I could perhaps use ##v## and insert it into the ##x##-direction part of the matrix...
Homework Statement: Problem:
The planet X is far 48 light-years from Earth. Suppose that we want to travel from Earth to planet X in a time no more than 23 years, as reckoned by clocks aboard our spaceship. At what constant speed would we have to travel? How long would the trip take as reckoned...
I have been getting back to studying physics after a long break and decided to go through the problems in Rindler. But there is something I don't quite understand in this problem.
To first answer the second part, Exercise II(12), I wrote $$\frac{du_2}{dt} = \frac{du_2}{du_2^\prime}...
Clarification:
The statement in the title is actually from the solution to the homework question, as given by the textbook (you can see the whole thing below under "Textbook solution"). The solution doesn't explain everything, which is where my confusion comes from. Usually in my classes we...
The Lorentz covariance of Maxwell equations was known before Einstein formulated special relativity. So what exactly special relativity brought new with respect to mere Lorentz covariance? Is special relativity just an interpretation of Lorentz invariance, in a sense in which Copenhagen...
I'm a bit lost at how to exactly start this exercise... As far as I understand we need to first determine ##d\tau_E## and ##d\tau_S##.
First question: Since we can neglect the Earth's movement, can I also neglect the movement of the satellite with respect to the far away observer? If so, I...
I'm struggling in the details of this exercise. Let ##S'## be the reference frame where the acceleration of the spaceship is constant, in which case we have ##u'(t')= a' t'## (since we assume no acceleration at the beginning). The rest frame of the rocket ##S## is connected to ##S'## via a...
Homework Statement: A spaceship has two clocks: one in the front and one at the back. The clocks are synchronized in the spaceship's frame of reference.
The spaceship zooms past the Earth's surface at a relativistic speed. Prove that in the Earth's frame of reference, the clock at the front...
Alice and Bob are initially in the same inertial frame. There are 2 point test masses m1 and m2. Initially m1 is at the origin and m2 is on the positive x-axis. At time zero, m1 is instantaneously accelerated to velocity Vx in the positive x-direction. After some time, m1 collides with m2...
Let m be a point test mass. Initially m has velocity Vy in the poisitive y-direction, and zero velocity in the x-direction. At time zero, m is accelerated in the positive x-direction. In the limit as the time goes to infinity, the velecity in the positive x-direction goes to the speed of...