1D Single Phase Flow in Porous Media

  • Thread starter Thread starter phil ess
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    1d Flow Phase
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling the flow of a slightly compressible liquid through a rigid, incompressible porous medium in one dimension, adhering to Darcy's law. The governing equation derived is a partial differential equation (PDE) that relates pressure, time, and position, specifically in the form of ∂P/∂t = α∂²P/∂x². The user seeks assistance in formulating appropriate boundary conditions, considering scenarios like constant pressure at one end and insulated conditions at the other. Suggestions include setting initial pressure conditions and exploring the implications of different boundary conditions on the solution. The conversation highlights the challenges faced by those unfamiliar with PDEs, particularly in applying them to fluid flow problems.
phil ess
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have been asked to model the flow of a slightly compressible liquid through a rigid, incompressible porous medium in 1D, assuming the flow obeys Darcy's law. I am given a rectangular prism of cross sectional area A with length L, a source of liquid (say water) on one side with total discharge Q, along with variables concerning the properties of the medium (porosity, permeability, etc). I am ignoring dispersion and diffusion effects.

Basically I am looking to find the pressure in the tube as a function of position and time, P(x,t).

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Combining the continuity equation,

\epsilon\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot\left(\rho k \nabla v\right) = 0

Ignore above line, not showing up correctly,

\epsilon\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot\left(\rho k \nabla v\right) = 0

with Darcy's law,

v = \frac{-k}{\mu}\nabla P

we get,

\epsilon\mu\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t} = \nabla\cdot\left(\rho k \nabla P\right)

Then assuming a liquid with compressibility c,

\rho = \rho_{o}e^{c(P-P_{o}}

which combines with the above to give the governing equation:

\epsilon\mu c \frac{\partial P}{\partial t} = \nabla\cdot\left(k \nabla P\right)

Combining the constant terms together, and since we are only considering the 1D flow in the x direction:

\frac{\partial P}{\partial t} = \alpha\frac{\partial^{2}P}{\partial x^{2}}

*** The first few equations are not showing up correctly. But what is important is the final results which seem ok.

Now all I need to do is solve this equation to get P(x,t).

What I am having problems with is the boundary conditions. I haven't taken any PDE courses or anything, so I'm not sure how they are supposed to be formulated, but I'll give some guesses:

P(x,0) = Pi ie. the pressure initially is some constant throughout the medium
Q = constant ie. the input flow rate is constant for all t
P(L,inf) = ?

I am assuming a finite medium with no discharge, so the liquid, and the pressure, will build up indefinitely, but I don't know what to put for the boundary at the end.

Like I said I am unfamiliar with PDEs which makes this very difficult. Later this problem will be extended to multi-phase flow, but this was given as a warm up for now.

Any help with this problem would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump!

I think I have the boundary conditions:

P(0,t) = some constant (non-zero, from Darcy's law)
P(L,t) = Po ??
P(x,0) = Pi or do I use dP/dx = 0 since the end is 'insulated'

Now I know how to solve pde's for both ends at 0 or both ends insulated, but not for one end at constant presure and the other end insulated. I'm thinking in terms of the analogy of heat flow in a wire.

Again any help is very much appreciated!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top