1lb cube of 99% pure copper?

  • #1
Coulin
2
0
I've been wrestling with something for a bit. I have one pound of copper (99%) in cube-form. Roughly 1.5 inches on a side. It's essentially a paperweight.

Are those dimensions in the ballpark for relatively pure copper?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Coulin said:
I've been wrestling with something for a bit. I have one pound of copper (99%) in cube-form. Roughly 1.5 inches on a side. It's essentially a paperweight.

Are those dimensions in the ballpark for relatively pure copper?
The volume of the cube is easy to calculate, the density of the cube is easy to find, easy to put them together to get an answer. Can you give it a shot.
 
  • #3
I can, I was struggling with the cubic centimeter. Thank you for the push. It's close enough that it's likely the imprecision of measurement that can make up the difference. A pure cube of copper would be 50.625 cmsqd. The results on my item were 55.3.

I was looking at it the other day and saw that it was the same size as three other paperweight cubes on my desk. One is a fidget toy, one is a Lucite display and one is a wooden block. Their manufacture dates span over a decade.

I enjoy copper, aesthetically. I'm trying to figure out why one pound of copper has the same (within a tolerance of a few millimeters) dimensions as things specifically manufactured to be aesthetically pleasing.
 
  • #4
Coulin said:
A pure cube of copper would be 50.625 cmsqd.
I'll assume the figure is correct, but the units aren't. They should be cm cubed, not squared. The volume should be written as ##50.625 \text{ cm}^3## or as 50. 625 cc, where cc is the common abbreviation for cubic centimeters.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
You have a typo: 60.625 cc
 
  • #6
hutchphd said:
You have a typo: 60.625 cc
Fixed the typo.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd
  • #7
Coulin said:
I've been wrestling with something for a bit. I have one pound of copper (99%) in cube-form. Roughly 1.5 inches on a side. It's essentially a paperweight.

Are those dimensions in the ballpark for relatively pure copper?
Depends on the size of your ballpark.

"Roughly 1.5 inches on a side" -- if it is 1.495 inches on a side, that reduces its volume by a factor of 0.99. If it isn't really a cube (flat sides, parallel and square) who knows? And how pure is "relatively pure"?

EDIT: Here is a good starting point for the different copper alloys
https://www.onlinemetals.com/en/product-guide#copper
 

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
72
Views
17K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
74
Views
13K
Back
Top