MHB -2.4.27 find center and radius of circle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the center and radius of the circle represented by the equation x^2+y^2+6x+8y+9=0. The equation is rewritten and simplified through completing the square, resulting in the standard form (x+3)²+(y+4)²=16, indicating a center at C(-3,-4) and a radius of R=4. Participants discuss the efficiency of the completing the square method, with one expressing interest in alternative methods and potential visual representations using TikZ code. While there is acknowledgment of the possibility of other techniques, completing the square is deemed the most effective approach. The conversation highlights a focus on mathematical methods for graphing circles.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Determine the graph of $x^2+y^2+6x+8y+9=0$
$\begin{array}{rll}
\textsf{rewrite} &(x^2+6x )+(y^2+8y)=-9\\
\textsf{complete square} &(x^2+6x+9)+(y^2+8y+16)=-9+9+16\\
\textsf{simplify equation} &(x+3)^2+(y+4)^2=16=4^2\\
\textsf{observation} &C(-3,-4), \quad R=4
\end{array}$

hopefully ok
is there another way to do this other than complete the square

if you are inclined to do so I would be interested in a tikz code would be fore this :unsure:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
this is ok

completing the square is probably the most efficient technique ...

Not saying there is no other method, but I'm not familiar with any.
 
Mahalo
often when post here an alternative is suggested...
:cool:
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top