MHB 243.14.7.4 Find all local extreme values

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Local
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny{243.14.7.4}$
Find all local extreme values of the given function and
identify each as a local maximum,local minimum,or saddlepoint
\begin{align*} \displaystyle
f_4(x,y)&=x^2+14x+y^2-12y+5\\
\end{align*}

saw this in the section

$\text{if we substitute the values} \\$
$\text{$f_xCa, b) = 0$ and $f_y(a, b) = 0$}\\$
$\text{ into the equation both zero.}\\$
$\text{ $f_x(a, b)(x - a)+f_y(a, b)(y - b) - (z - f(a, b)) = 0$ } $

ok i haven't done this before so kinda lost
read the section on but didn't get the derivatives
answer
$\color{red}{f_4(-7,6)}=\color{red}{-80}\\$
$\color{red}{\textit{local minimum}}$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
$f(x,y)= x^2+ 14x+ y^2- 12y+ 5$. The partial derivatives are $f_x= 2x+ 14$ and $f_y= 2y- 12$. Setting those equal to 0, $2x+ 14= 0$ gives $x= -7$ and $2y- 12= 0$ gives $y= 6$. The only possible extremum is, as you say, at (-7, 6). I have no idea what the subscript "4" indicates. Was that a typo?

There are several different ways to determine whether that extremum is a "maximum", "minimum", or "saddle point".

One is to look at the second derivatives. $f_{xx}= 2$, $f_{yy}= 2$, and $f_{xy}= 0$. Those are all positive meaning that the extremum is convex upward so a minimum.

And one way to do this without using derivatives at all is to "complete the square" in both x and y: $f(x, y)= x^2+ 14x+ 49- 49+ y^2- 12y+ 36- 36+ 5= (x- 7)^2+ (y- 6)^2- 49- 36+ 5= (x+ 7)^2+ (y- 6)^2- 80$. That last shows that the graph is a paraboloid with vertex at (-7, 6, -80) opening upward.
 
subscipt 4 is the problem number
but probably shouldn't use it with these.

ok I have more of these to do
trying to finish up this homework set before end of year
trying to get into calc IV :rolleyes:
 
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...

Similar threads

Back
Top