2D Phase portrait - Black hole?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the trajectories around a black hole using the equation for radial distance in terms of azimuthal angle. In part (a), the system is reduced to two dimensions, revealing fixed points at (0,0) and (1/ε, 0), with the former being a center and the latter a saddle point. The direction of the fastest perturbations is identified as u = v. In part (b), the eigenvalue analysis indicates that for |u| > 1/(2ε), particles are not trapped by the black hole. The stability of fixed points may differ in the non-linearized version of the system.
unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Trajectories around a black hole can be described by ## \frac{d^2u}{d\theta^2} + u = \alpha \epsilon u^2 ##, where ##u = \frac{1}{r}## and ##\theta## is azimuthal angle.

(a) By using ##v = \frac{du}{d\theta}##, reduce system to 2D and find fixed points and their stability. Find direction of fastest perturbations.
(b) Sketch the phase portrait. Would stability of fixed points differ in the non-linearized version?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Part (a)
The equations now become ##\delta v = \delta \dot u## and ##\delta \dot v + \delta u = 2\epsilon u \delta u##.
2010_B1_Q1.png

Fixed points are ##\left( 0,0 \right)## and ##\left( \frac{1}{\epsilon}, 0 \right)##. At ##(0,0)##, all eigenvalues are imaginary, so the fixed point is a center. At ##(\frac{1}{\epsilon},0)##, eigenvalues are ##\pm 1## so fixed point is a saddle.
Eigenvalue of ##J + J^T## is ##2\epsilon u## and direction of fastest perturbation is ##u=v##.

Part(b)
Eigenvalue in general is ##\lambda^2 = (2\epsilon u - 1)##, so for ##|u| > \frac{1}{2\epsilon}##, the particle doesn't get trapped by the black hole?

2010_B1_Q1_2.png

 
Physics news on Phys.org
bumpp
 
bumpp
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top