4 Pole Induction Motor Working Principle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the working principle of a 4-pole induction motor, particularly how it generates a rotating magnetic field similar to a 2-pole motor. The underlying physics remains consistent across different pole configurations, with variations primarily affecting torque and RPM characteristics. More poles result in smaller increments of rotor movement per cycle, while fewer poles allow for higher speeds but lower torque. The user seeks additional academic resources to better understand the 4-pole motor's operation. Overall, the principles of induction motor functionality remain unchanged despite the number of poles.
BlackMelon
Messages
43
Reaction score
7
Hello,

I am studying the working principle of an induction motor. The attachment below (link) is a portion from Stephen J. Chapman's textbook (page 160-169). He proved the theory of the rotating magnetic field so well for a 2-pole induction motor from 160 to 164. However, on page 166, the author proposed a 4-pole motor but did not provide the similar proof. I would like to know how this configuration forms a rotating magnetic field and makes the rotor (squirrel cage) rotate. Do you guys have any good papers for this?

https://www.mediafire.com/file/86a7...-2bh471C15I5A5Gi_YZx77Vy9g6jgxUTzcZuZAwiHQijI

Thank You
BlackMelon
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
@BlackMelon the number of poles is just that aka the number of poles, the underlying physics of how the motor works doesn't change. The only thing that changes is the torque and RPM characteristic of the motor but the physics is the same, you still have a current that changes with time and drags the rotor along, only with more poles each set of coils drags the rotor a smaller distance.

Having less coil pairs/pole pairs means that each coil is located more degrees apart and each cycle drags the rotor for a longer distance.
This is why for a given fixed frequency fast RPM motors usually have less poles , as a consequence they also have less torque
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top