I 64% n.th + COP4 = more heat out of fuel than its calorific value?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter cmb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fuel Heat Value
AI Thread Summary
A CCGT generating power at 64% efficiency combined with a COP4 heat pump suggests a theoretical output of 256% thermal energy from the fuel's calorific value, raising questions about the source of the extra heat. The discussion highlights that while this seems counterintuitive, it is explained by the heat pump's ability to transfer environmental heat, not create energy. The concept of Coefficient of Performance (COP) is clarified as a measure of efficiency that can exceed 100%, which does not violate thermodynamic laws. The conversation also explores the potential for directly harnessing combustion temperatures to capture additional heat without electrical generation. Overall, the principles of energy transfer and thermodynamics are central to understanding these efficiencies.
cmb
Messages
1,128
Reaction score
128
TL;DR Summary
If a CCGT generates electrical power at 64% efficiency, and a heat pump generates 4 times the thermal power to electrical power, is that more heat energy out than the fuel has?
Something that has been on my mind a while.

If a CCGT generates electrical power at 64% efficiency, and a COP4 heat pump, powered by that generator, generates 4 times the thermal power to electrical power, wouldn't that mean we can get 256% heat out of the fuel's calorific value?

Maybe that is OK, but seems non-intuitive.

Where does the extra heat come from, or what am I not understanding?

I presume the answer is that because we're going from 'very hot' heat to colder heat, we can suck up some of the environmental heat? If so, is there not a more direct way to use the combustion temperature from a burning fuel to directly suck in extra heat from the environment, missing out the electrical generation bit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Short summary of @Llewelyn 's point: COP is like efficiency, but it is not efficiency. It is always way over 100%. That's not a violation of the laws of thermo. The energy isn't being created, just moved, and there are hard restrictions on the available temperature deltas.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top