A few tricky integrals.... Or are they?

  • MHB
  • Thread starter DreamWeaver
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Integrals
In summary, Vardi's integral can be evaluated by letting $ f(z) = \frac{2a}{(a^{2}+z^{2}) \cosh z}$, and integrating around a rectangle or circle in the upper-half complex plane.
  • #1
DreamWeaver
303
0
Here are a few Vardi-type integrals I recently posted on another forum (some of you might have seen them)...Assuming the following classic result - due to Vardi - holds...[tex]\int_{\pi/4}^{\pi/2}\log\log(\tan x)\,dx=\frac{\pi}{2}\log\left[\sqrt{2\pi}\frac{\Gamma(3/4)}{\Gamma(1/4)}\right][/tex]Prove that:
[tex]\int_{\pi/4}^{\pi/2}\log^2[\log(\tan x)]\,dx=[/tex]

[tex]\beta''(1)+\frac{\pi^3}{24}-\frac{\pi\gamma^2}{4}-\pi\gamma\log\left[\sqrt{2\pi}\frac{\Gamma(3/4)}{\Gamma(1/4)}\right][/tex]and...[tex]\int_{\pi/4}^{\pi/2}\log^3[\log(\tan x)]\,dx=[/tex]

[tex]\beta'''(1)-3\gamma\,\beta''(1)+\frac{\pi\gamma^3}{2}-\frac{\pi}{2}\zeta(3) + \left(\frac{\pi^3}{4}+\frac{3\pi\gamma^2}{2}\right)\log\left[\sqrt{2\pi}\frac{\Gamma(3/4)}{\Gamma(1/4)}\right][/tex]
Where \(\displaystyle \beta(x)\,\) is the Dirichlet Beta function, defined by:\(\displaystyle \beta(x)=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^k}{(2k+1)^x}\)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I saw your other post, so I'm not going to say much.

But here's a brief outline of a way to evaluate Vardi's integral.Let $ \displaystyle I(a) = \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\ln(a^{2}+x^{2})}{\cosh x} \ dx $ and differentiate inside of the integral to get $ \displaystyle I'(a) = \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{2a}{(a^{2}+x^{2}) \cosh x} \ dx $.

$I'(a)$ can be evaluated be letting $ \displaystyle f(z) = \frac{2a}{(a^{2}+z^{2}) \cosh z}$ and integrating around a rectangle or circle in the upper-half complex plane.

After somewhat tedious calculations, you''ll find that $ \displaystyle I'(a) = \Big[ \psi \Big(\frac{3}{4} + \frac{a}{2 \pi} \Big) - \psi \Big(\frac{1}{4} + \frac{a}{2 \pi} \Big) \Big]$

Then integrate back with respect to $a$.

Finding the constant of integration is tricky. It involves rewriting the integral and letting $a$ go to $\infty$.

But it will turn out that $ \displaystyle I(a) = 2 \pi \ln \Bigg[ \sqrt{2 \pi} \frac{\Gamma(\frac{3}{4} + \frac{a}{2 \pi})}{\Gamma(\frac{1}{4} + \frac{a}{2 \pi})} \Bigg] $

Then $ \displaystyle \lim_{a \to 0^{+}} I(a) = 2 \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\ln x}{\cosh x} \ dx = 2 \pi \ln \Bigg[ \sqrt{2 \pi} \frac{\Gamma(\frac{3}{4})}{\Gamma(\frac{1}{4})} \Bigg] $

Finally make the change of variables $x = \ln (\tan u) $.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Very nice, RV! (Rock)
 
  • #4
No worries if not, but just in case anyone's interested, here's a little hint to get you started in the right direction...

(Bandit)
Consider the integral:\(\displaystyle \int_0^{\infty}\frac{x^{q-1}}{\cosh x}\,dx\)for the real parameter \(\displaystyle q\in\mathbb{R}^+\)
 
  • #5

I find these integrals to be quite interesting and challenging. The result by Vardi, which is used as a starting point, is a well-known and important result in mathematics. It relates the logarithmic integral function to the gamma function, which has many applications in various fields of science.

To prove the first integral, we can use the substitution u = log(tan(x)). This gives us du = sec^2(x) dx, and the limits of integration become log(sqrt(2)) and log(1). Using the result by Vardi, we can write the integral as:

int_{log(sqrt(2))}^{log(1)} u^2 du = \beta''(1) = \frac{\pi}{2}\log\left[\sqrt{2\pi}\frac{\Gamma(3/4)}{\Gamma(1/4)}\right]

Hence, we have proved the first integral by using the known result for \beta''(1).

Similarly, for the second integral, we can use the substitution u = log(tan(x)) again. This gives us du = sec^2(x) dx and the limits of integration become log(sqrt(2)) and log(1). Using the result for \beta'''(1) and the result by Vardi, we can write the integral as:

int_{log(sqrt(2))}^{log(1)} u^3 du = \beta'''(1) = \beta''(1) + \frac{\pi^3}{24} - \frac{\pi\gamma^2}{4} - \pi\gamma\log\left[\sqrt{2\pi}\frac{\Gamma(3/4)}{\Gamma(1/4)}\right]

This proves the second integral as well.

The third integral is more complex and requires the use of multiple properties of the Dirichlet Beta function and the gamma function. We can use the same substitution as before and expand u^3 in terms of \beta(x) to get:

int_{log(sqrt(2))}^{log(1)} u^3 du = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^k}{(2k+1)^3}\int_{log(sqrt(2))}^{log(1)}sec^2(x)dx

Using the known result for \beta''(1) and the integral
 

FAQ: A few tricky integrals.... Or are they?

What are integrals?

Integrals are mathematical tools used to compute the area under a curve or the volume of a solid. They are commonly used in calculus and are essential for solving many physics and engineering problems.

What makes integrals tricky?

Integrals can be tricky because they involve complex functions, and finding the correct method to solve them can be challenging. Additionally, there are many different techniques for solving integrals, and choosing the most efficient one can be difficult.

How can I improve my skills in solving integrals?

To improve your skills in solving integrals, it is essential to have a strong understanding of calculus and the various techniques for solving integrals, such as substitution, integration by parts, and trigonometric substitutions. Practice and perseverance are also key to mastering integrals.

Are there any shortcuts for solving tricky integrals?

Yes, there are some shortcuts for solving tricky integrals. These include using symmetry, simplifying the integrand, and using known formulas or identities. It is also helpful to break down the integral into smaller, more manageable parts.

Is there a specific order in which I should try to solve integrals?

There is no specific order in which you should try to solve integrals. It often depends on the specific integral and the techniques you are familiar with. However, it is generally recommended to try simpler techniques first and then move on to more advanced methods if necessary.

Similar threads

Back
Top