A monatomic gas in a 2d Universe - multiplicity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the multiplicity and entropy of a monatomic ideal gas in a two-dimensional universe. The user is working on deriving the multiplicity formula, encountering confusion regarding a factor of 2 in their calculations. They express their findings, which include the multiplicity of space and momentum, and how these contribute to the total multiplicity. A response suggests that the factor of 2 can be disregarded as it is insignificant compared to the overall multiplicity value. The conversation highlights the complexities of adapting three-dimensional gas laws to a two-dimensional context.
TFM
Messages
1,016
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a monatomic ideal gas that lives in a two-dimensional universe (“flatland”), occupying an area A instead of a volume V.

(a)

By following the logic of the derivation for the three-dimensional case, show that the multiplicity of this gas can be written:

\Omega = \frac{1}{N!}\frac{A^N}{h^{2N}}\frac{\pi^N}{N!}(2MU)^N

(b)

Find an expression for the entropy of this two-dimensional gas. Express your result in terms of U, A and N.

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



I have practically finished part a, with one small exception. for the pi fraction, I have 2pi instead of pi?

Some of my working out:

The space multiplicity:

\Omega_{space} = (\frac{A}{(\Delta x)^2})^N

The multiplicity of momentum:

\Omega_{mom} = (\frac{A_{hypercircle}}{(\Delta p_x)})^{2N}

\Omega_{mom} = (\frac{A_{hypercircle} ^{2N}}{(\Delta p_x^{2N})})

The total multiplicity is the multiple:

\Omega = \Omega_{space}\Omega_{mom}

\Omega = ((\frac{A}{(\Delta x)^2})^N )(\frac{A_{hypercircle} ^{2N}}{(\Delta p_x^{2N})} )

This can be rearranged, and using Heisenberg's Uncertainty princeple, \Delta x \Delta p_x \approx h

this gives:
\Omega = \frac{A^N A_{hypercircle}}{h^{2N}}

For indistinguishable particles:

\Omega = \frac{1}{N!}\frac{A^N}{h^{2N}}A_{hypercircle}

Area of hypercircle:

\frac{2\pi^N}{(N - 1)!}{\sqrt{2mu}^{2N-1}}

and using approximations:

\Omega = \frac{1}{N!}\frac{A^N}{h^{2N}}\frac{2\pi^N}{N!}{2mu^N}

As you can see, close, just that annoying 2...

Any ideas how to get rid of it?

Thanks in advanced,

TFM
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have attached the entre workings out. any idewa how to get rid iof that pesky 2...?

TFM
 

Attachments

  • Workings Out.jpg
    Workings Out.jpg
    7.6 KB · Views: 1,508
Sorry for 2 year late reply. You're probably graduated by now. But according to Schroeder's book, for part (a),

you can simply throw away the 2 because the multiplicity is very large compared to the 2, and thus it won't really make a difference. He then apologizes below for sloppy working. But... oh well that's what I just read.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Back
Top