A particle inside eletric field

AI Thread Summary
A charged particle with an initial speed of 66 m/s and specific charge and mass is approaching a fixed charged particle, and the goal is to find the distance at which its velocity becomes zero. The initial calculation yielded a distance of 0.00761 meters. However, there is confusion regarding the application of SUVAT equations and the need for integration due to non-uniform acceleration. It is suggested that using electric potential and kinetic energy is more appropriate for this scenario, as the force varies with distance. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying concepts from physics to solve the problem accurately.
Alois Herzog Heinz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical forums, so no HH Template is shown.
Sorry about my english , I'm still learning.

I did it by energy, but i want to solve by integration

QUESTION : A charged and massive particle runs with 66 m/s, 3^10-6 coulomb and 6^10-3 Kg towards a fixed particle with 4,5^10-6 coulomb, separated by 4,3 meters . What's the distance between them which the initial velocity is zero ?

ANSWER : 0,00761 meters .

I started that way :

1) a = F/m ; F= kQq/r² ; 2) v²=vo² - 2.a.d; and i substituted the acceleration gives by 1 in equation 2 . So i isolated d and integrated 4,2 and (4,2-d) interval. It results in a cubic equation which doesn't make sense .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Alois, :welcome:

This is not a matter of uniform acceleration ! You can't use the SUVAT equations here.
And you don't need to integrate either. That is being taken care of perfectly by using the electric potential.
Or did you do that already and did you find the 8 mm that way ?

Could you show your calculations in a bit more detail ? I can't follow what you mean with (4,2) and (4,2-d) ?
 
BvU said:
Hello Alois, :welcome:

This is not a matter of uniform acceleration ! You can't use the SUVAT equations here.
And you don't need to integrate either. That is being taken care of perfectly by using the electric potential.
Or did you do that already and did you find the 8 mm that way ?

Could you show your calculations in a bit more detail ? I can't follow what you mean with (4,2) and (4,2-d) ?

I already dit it by using eletric potential and cinetic energy (as Wolfgang Bauer's book did) . By integration i didn't find the correct answer .
I thought even the acceleration is not uniform , is given us how it changes with the distance , and we can evaluate by integrating all points of it in the path . SUVAT equation was the only way i saw to associate velocity , acceleration and distance .

(4,2) and (4,2-d) are the higher and lower integral limitshttp://[ATTACH=full]200062[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]200063[/ATTACH]
 

Attachments

  • PLAIN]%20[Broken].jpg
    PLAIN]%20[Broken].jpg
    13 KB · Views: 193
  • 2a94obd.jpg
    2a94obd.jpg
    13 KB · Views: 172
Last edited by a moderator:
The equation of motion for uniform acceleration integrates a constant acceleration ##\vec a = {\vec F \over m}##. Here you have to deal with a force that depends on ##| \vec r - \vec r' | ## . In the simplest form ( ## F = - {1\over r^2} ## ) this gives a ## 1\over r ## as you find in the expression for the potential.

Alois Herzog Heinz said:
A charged and massive particle runs with 66 m/s, 3^10-6 coulomb and 6^10-3 Kg towards a fixed particle with 4,5^10-6 coulomb, separated by 4,3 meters . What's the distance between them which the initial velocity is zero ?
I did not understand the underlined part ?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top