A particle leaves the origin (motion in 2 dimensions)

AI Thread Summary
A particle with an initial velocity of 3.92i m/s and constant acceleration of -1.00i -0.80j m/s² is analyzed to determine its maximum x-coordinate. The maximum x is reached when the x-component of velocity equals zero, which requires solving kinematic equations. The discussion emphasizes splitting motion into x and y components and using the appropriate kinematic formulas to find velocity and position. Integration is mentioned but clarified that kinematics equations can be directly applied without it. Ultimately, the correct approach leads to successfully determining the particle's velocity and position at its maximum x-coordinate.
XxBollWeevilx
Messages
78
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle leaves the origin with an initial velocity v = 3.92i , in m/s. It experiences a constant acceleration
a = -1.00i -0.80j , in m/s2. What is the velocity of the particle when it reaches its maximum x coordinate?

i-component of velocity?

j-component of the velocity?

When does it reach its maximum x coordinate?

Where is the particle at this time? i-component of position?

j-component of position?


Homework Equations


Trying to figure this out...


The Attempt at a Solution



I've been pondering this problem for a while now and I'm stumped. I realize that the object is given an initial velocity in the x direction. Due to its acceleration, it will eventually stop moving altogether. However, I have no clue how the "maximum x" value comes into play, or how I can find it. I'm looking over the kinematics formulas and I can't seem to get them to where I do not have two unknown variables. If anyone could give me a pointer as to how I should approach this problem, I would greatly appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Split the motion into x and y components. It reaches maximum x when x'(t)=0. Use equations like s(t)=s0+v0*t+(1/2)*a*t^2.
 
XxBollWeevilx said:
Due to its acceleration, it will eventually stop moving altogether.

Well, no not in this case. the object starts with a velocity to the right, and is under constant acceleration down and to the left, so it will always be moving even when it is furthest to the left.

XxBollWeevilx said:
However, I have no clue how the "maximum x" value comes into play, or how I can find it. I'm looking over the kinematics formulas and I can't seem to get them to where I do not have two unknown variables. If anyone could give me a pointer as to how I should approach this problem, I would greatly appreciate it.


Forget the formulae. There's only two you need to know for these kinds of problems: \vec{a}=\frac{d}{dt}\vec{v} and \vec{v}=\frac{d}{dt}\vec{r}, where \vec{r} is the object's position vector, \vec{v} is the object's velocity vector, and \vec{a} is the object's acceleration vector. Your object has a constant acceleration vector, an initial velocity vector, and an initial position vector. From there, you can set \vec{a} to a constant and integrate from t = 0 to t to get your velocity vector. Then to find the maximum x value, set the velocity in the x direction to 0 and solve for t.
 
Thank you both, I will try and use your advice to try and solve the problem. I don't understand the integration though...what exactly would I integrate to get the velocity? Velocity is the derivative of position with respect to time, so would the velocity be the integral of acceleration with respect to time? If so, would I integrate the expression a = -1.00i -0.80j?

Thanks so much for the help.
 
I don't think you need to integrate anything. The kinematics equations are already integrated. They are for courses that don't use differential equations. Just use them. Just split the motion into components.
 
Thanks...I ended up getting the correct answers. Here's what I did:

I set the first derivative of the equation you gave (which is essentially the basic formula v=v_0+at to zero to find at which time the maximum x would occur. Then I found the x and y velocity using that same formula but working in the dimensions as you suggested. Then I used the position formula in each dimension r=v_0t+\frac{1}{2}at^2 to find the position components.

Thanks again for the help!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top