A problem regarding to Lagrangian in Classical Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that a modified Lagrangian, L' = L + dF/dt, satisfies Lagrange's equations. Participants emphasize the need to substitute L' into the equations and expand the time derivative of F into partial derivatives. It is clarified that since F is an arbitrary function of the generalized coordinates, its partial derivatives cannot be assumed to be zero. The conversation also addresses the correct application of multivariable differentiation techniques to derive the necessary relationships. Ultimately, the focus is on ensuring proper notation and summation in the equations to reach a valid conclusion.
iiternal
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a problem regarding to lagrangian.

If L is a Lagrangian for a system of n degrees of freedom satisfying Lagrange's equations, show by direct substitution that

L' = L + \frac{d F(q_1,...,q_n,t)}{d t}

also satisfies Lagrange's equations where F is any ARBITRARY BUT DIFFERENTIABLE function of its arguments.

Homework Equations


Lagrange's equations:
\frac{\partial L}{\partial q_i} - \frac{d}{d t}\frac{\partial L}{\dot{\partial q_i}} =0

The Attempt at a Solution


Equivalently we have to find
\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} - \frac{d}{d t}\frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot{q_i}} =0
It is obvious that \frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot{q_i}}=0.
But how can I get \frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i}=0 ?

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, iiternal! :smile:

This looks like an exercise in multivariable differentiation.

Let's start with your relevant equation.
You seem to have dropped a partial derivative there...

I'm afraid that since F is an arbitrary function of ##q_i##, you won't get ##\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i}=0##.

I believe you have to substitute L' in Lagrange's equation and expand everything.
This means expanding dF/dt into partial derivatives.
Do you know how to do that?
 
Thank you very much! You are absolutely right!

let ## G = \frac{dF}{dt} = \sum\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i}\dot{q_i}+\frac{\partial F}{\partial t}##;
Substitute it into Lagrange's Equation
## \frac{\partial G}{\partial q_i} - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial G}{\partial \dot{q_i}}
= (\frac{\partial^2F}{\partial q_i^2}\dot{q} + \frac{\partial^2F}{\partial q_i\partial t}) - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} ##

I believe the last term can somehow cancel both the first two terms.
When I tried to expand the last term, I faced another problem
## \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} = \frac{\partial }{\partial q}\frac{\partial F}{\partial t} + ?##
How can I take derivative of the denominator of a differentiation?

I like Serena said:
Welcome to PF, iiternal! :smile:

This looks like an exercise in multivariable differentiation.

Let's start with your relevant equation.
You seem to have dropped a partial derivative there...

I'm afraid that since F is an arbitrary function of ##q_i##, you won't get ##\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i}=0##.

I believe you have to substitute L' in Lagrange's equation and expand everything.
This means expanding dF/dt into partial derivatives.
Do you know how to do that?
 
iiternal said:
Thank you very much! You are absolutely right!

let ## G = \frac{dF}{dt} = \sum\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i}\dot{q_i}+\frac{\partial F}{\partial t}##;
Substitute it into Lagrange's Equation
## \frac{\partial G}{\partial q_i} - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial G}{\partial \dot{q_i}}
= (\frac{\partial^2F}{\partial q_i^2}\dot{q} + \frac{\partial^2F}{\partial q_i\partial t}) - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} ##

I believe the last term can somehow cancel both the first two terms.
When I tried to expand the last term, I faced another problem
## \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} = \frac{\partial }{\partial q}\frac{\partial F}{\partial t} + ?##
How can I take derivative of the denominator of a differentiation?

Good! :)

I'm afraid you should not use the index i everywhere and keep the summations.

Your equations should read:
## G = \frac{dF}{dt} = \sum\limits_j\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_j}\dot{q_j}+\frac{\partial F}{\partial t} ##

Substitute it into Lagrange's Equation
## \frac{\partial G}{\partial q_i} - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial G}{\partial \dot{q_i}}
= \sum\limits_j ... ##

And:
## \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} = \sum\limits_j {\partial^2 F \over \partial q_j\partial q_i} \dot q_j + {\partial^2 F \over \partial t\partial q_i}##
 
Great !
Thank you very much!
Happy New Year.

I like Serena said:
Good! :)

I'm afraid you should not use the index i everywhere and keep the summations.

Your equations should read:
## G = \frac{dF}{dt} = \sum\limits_j\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_j}\dot{q_j}+\frac{\partial F}{\partial t} ##

Substitute it into Lagrange's Equation
## \frac{\partial G}{\partial q_i} - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial G}{\partial \dot{q_i}}
= \sum\limits_j ... ##

And:
## \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} = \sum\limits_j {\partial^2 F \over \partial q_j\partial q_i} \dot q_j + {\partial^2 F \over \partial t\partial q_i}##
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top