A question from Weinberg's qft book

  • Thread starter Thread starter bugl0ver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Qft
bugl0ver
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
can anybody tell me how to induce the quantum field theory
as long as you admit the quantum mechanics and the reletivity?
it seems that in Weinberg's book ,he shows that,but i can not
quite understand:confused:
thank you :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, we really cannot help you if you state your question like this. You need to be a whole lot more specific. What exactly do you want to know ? What concept are you not gettin' ? Please give some reference to a formula, approach, a "name", ... Also tell us something about your situation : are you a college student ?, undergrad ?, How's your QM and special relativity knowledge ?

regards
marlon

ps : i urge you not to use Weinberg's book to study intro QFT. Have you considered Zee's book (QFT in a Nutshell) ? Are you doing this in college ?
 
re

i am a student learning theoretical physics.and i hav read some chapters
of Zee's book.and i think i can follow his idea rather than Weinberg:-p
What i mean is that in many books such like Peskin's just tell us how to
calculate,and it induce the qft so abruptly.
So i think Wein's book will helpful.Maybe my question looks ugly and i think i get my answer myself now.
but what i want to know now is that is qft just a tool in some sence?
thank you:biggrin:
 
QFT is the theoretical model to describe the interactions of many particle systems, caracterized by the fact that the total number of particles does not need to be a constant. This actually is what the "second quantisation" is all about. Particles can be created and annihilated. The biggest difference between QM and QFT is

1) in QM, the total number of particles is constant
2) In QFT, the fundamental property are the FIELDS while in QM they are the wavefunctions.

There are several quantum field theories like QED (describes the EM interaction), QCD (describes the strong force), etc etc


marlon

edit : check out this thread for further clarification
 
You can get QFT by simply applying canonical quantization to classical fields. There's nothing more to it.

Daniel.
 
Hi,

I recommend Dirac's Lectures on Quantum Mechanics. It is about 5 bucks and is well worth it. The 2nd lecture is "The Problem of Quantization".
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
113
Views
9K
Replies
69
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top