A question is physics (electricity)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the existence of at least one conductor with no negative surface charge density within a finite set of conductors that collectively have a positive overall charge. Participants clarify the original question, noting that it involves understanding the relationship between surface charge density and electric fields, as well as the potentials of conductors. It is emphasized that proving the existence of a conductor with either positive or zero surface charge density is equivalent to proving the absence of negative charge density. Hints are provided to guide the approach to solving the problem. The conversation highlights the complexities of translating physics concepts accurately.
s21288
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
"Everything there is in the universe is a number of conductors that their overall load is greater than zero. Prove that there is at least one conductor with no negative density surface charge anywhere"
thx for any help...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is that the original question? It looks like a translation, and it is tricky for me to guess the initial problem.

We have a [finite] set of conductors with an overall [charge?] greater than zero? And the task is to prove the existence of a conductor with positive charge density on its whole surface?

In that case: What do you know about potentials of conductors?
What do you know about the relation between (surface) charge density and electric fields?
Those two should give you an idea how to approach that.
 
actually it is a translation from hebrew... you translated it right but they say "to prove the existence of at least one conductor with no negetive surface charge density anywhere on it"
 
Okay, I should have written "positive or zero", as this is identical to "not negative".
See my hints to get some idea how you could start.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top