A question on publication process in Physical Review D

  • Thread starter Sunny Singh
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Publishing
In summary, the publication process in Physical Review D involves several key steps, including manuscript submission, peer review, and final acceptance. Authors submit their research papers, which are then evaluated by experts in the field for quality and validity. After revisions based on reviewer feedback, the manuscript may be accepted for publication, ensuring that the research meets the journal's standards for scientific rigor and significance.
  • #1
Sunny Singh
19
1
Dear All,

A few days ago, my first paper in Physical Review D got accepted, but today, I found out that there is a minor mistake in the paper that changes the value of a quantity in a table. It doesn't change the final results, the physics or the paper's main point. It's just a calculation error. I need to make three changes-- change the value in the table for one of the 7 coefficients, one equation for the expression for that particular coefficient, and I need to strike out 3 lines that discuss that coefficient's earlier value.

What should I do now? Should I contact the editor or should i request these changes in the proofreading phase? And will these changes be published as an erratum or since I caught this before it actually gets published, it won't be shown as an erratum?

PS. I can see that it has gone into production phase now.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Let the editor know right away. He/she will tell you what the options are based on where it is in the process.
 
  • Like
Likes Sunny Singh
  • #3
Vanadium 50 said:
Let the editor know right away. He/she will tell you what the options are based on where it is in the process.
Thanks. I'll send an email to the editor today itself.
 

FAQ: A question on publication process in Physical Review D

What is the submission process for manuscripts to Physical Review D?

The submission process for manuscripts to Physical Review D typically involves authors submitting their paper through the online submission system. Authors must create an account, upload their manuscript and supplementary materials, and provide all necessary information, including author details and funding sources. After submission, the paper undergoes an initial screening for compliance with the journal's guidelines before being sent out for peer review.

How long does the review process take for Physical Review D?

The review process for Physical Review D can vary, but it generally takes several months. After submission, the manuscript is assigned to an editor who selects appropriate reviewers. The time taken for reviewers to evaluate the paper and provide feedback can differ based on their availability and the complexity of the work. Authors can typically expect to receive feedback within 3 to 6 months, though this can be longer in some cases.

What are the criteria for acceptance in Physical Review D?

The criteria for acceptance in Physical Review D include the originality of the research, the significance of the findings, the clarity and quality of the presentation, and the thoroughness of the analysis. The paper must also contribute meaningfully to the field of particle physics, cosmology, or related areas. Reviewers assess these aspects during the peer review process, and the editor makes the final decision based on their recommendations.

Can authors suggest reviewers for their manuscript submitted to Physical Review D?

Yes, authors can suggest potential reviewers for their manuscript when submitting to Physical Review D. While the editorial team considers these suggestions, they are not obligated to use them. Authors should ensure that their suggested reviewers have no conflicts of interest and are qualified to evaluate the manuscript's content.

What should authors do if they receive a revision request from Physical Review D?

If authors receive a revision request from Physical Review D, they should carefully address all the comments and suggestions provided by the reviewers and the editor. It is important to revise the manuscript accordingly and prepare a detailed response letter that outlines how each point was addressed. Authors should then resubmit the revised manuscript along with the response letter, clearly indicating the changes made in the manuscript.

Similar threads

Back
Top