Abelian groups and exponent of a group

moont14263
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Let p be a prime. Let H_{i}, i=1,...,n be normal subgroups of a finite group G. I want to prove the following:
If G/H_{i}, i=1,...,n are abelian groups of exponent dividing p-1, then G/N is abelian group of exponent dividing p-1 where N=\bigcap H_{i} ,i=1,...,n.

Proof:
Since G/H_{i}, i=1,...,n are abelian groups, then G^{'} (the derived subgroup of G) is contained in every H_{i}, i=1,...,n. Hence G^{'} is contained in N. Therefore G/N is abelian. I do not know how to deal with the exponent.
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
moont14263 said:
Let p be a prime. Let H_{i}, i=1,...,n be normal subgroups of a finite group G. I want to prove the following:
If G/H_{i}, i=1,...,n are abelian groups of exponent dividing p-1, then G/N is abelian group of exponent dividing p-1 where N=\bigcap H_{i} ,i=1,...,n.

Proof:
Since G/H_{i}, i=1,...,n are abelian groups, then G^{'} (the derived subgroup of G) is contained in every H_{i}, i=1,...,n. Hence G^{'} is contained in N. Therefore G/N is abelian. I do not know how to deal with the exponent.
Thanks in advance.


I think you only need the following two things:

1) If A is an abelian group of exponent m, then the exponent of any subgroup of A and of any homomorphic image of A divides m

(2)\,\,\forall i\,\,,\,\, N \leq H_i\, \Longrightarrow \,\,\forall\,\, g\in G\,\,,\, m(g + N) = N\Longrightarrow mg \in N \leq H_i\Longrightarrow \,m(g + H_i) = H_i \Longrightarrow
\Longrightarrow\, m\,\, \text{divides the exponent of}\,\, G/H_i\,\, .

DonAntonio
 
thank you very much.
 
Excuse me, how did you know that m is less than the exponent of G/Hi?
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
168
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
701
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top