About Separation of Variables for the Laplace Equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the Laplace equation in cylindrical coordinates using the method of separation of variables. The user is struggling with understanding the transition from one equation to another and seeks clarification on the basis of the equations presented. Key to the solution is the orthogonality condition of Bessel functions, which states that the integral of the product of different Bessel functions over a specified range is zero unless the indices are the same. This leads to the conclusion that only the term where m equals n contributes to the sum in the solution. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing orthogonality in simplifying the solution process.
hectoryx
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is a try for the solution of Laplace Equation. We have to calculate the potential distribution in a cylinder coordinate. However, there is a step really bring us trouble. Please go to the detail. You can either read it in the related URL, or in my PDF attachment..
The uncompleted solution is:
http://i1021.photobucket.com/albums/af335/hectoryx/Bessel001.jpg

Homework Equations



The method on the book is that:
http://i1021.photobucket.com/albums/af335/hectoryx/Bessel002.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



I really do not know what the basis of above equation is. Why can we get (2) from (1)? Does anyone give me any advice?
Thanks in advance.

Regards

Hector
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
You do exactly what they say you should do:

U_0=\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}A_m\sinh\left(\frac{P_m h}{a}\right)J_0\left(\frac{P_m r}{a}\right)

\implies\int_0^a U_0 J_0\left(\frac{P_n r}{a}\right)rdr=\int_0^a \left[\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}A_m\sinh\left(\frac{P_m h}{a}\right)J_0\left(\frac{P_m r}{a}\right)\right] J_0\left(\frac{P_n r}{a}\right)rdr=\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}A_m\sinh\left(\frac{P_m h}{a}\right)\left[\int_0^aJ_0\left(\frac{P_m r}{a}\right) J_0\left(\frac{P_n r}{a}\right)rdr\right]

What does the orthoganality condition tell you about the integral on the RHS?
 
Wo, Thanks for your reply so soon!

I understood your means.

About the orthogonality condition, actually, there is one of the charactrestics of Bessel function, isn't it?

we have:

\int _0^{\alpha }J_0\left(\frac{P_mr}{\alpha }\right)J_0\left(\frac{P_nr}{\alpha }\right)rdr=0 if m\neq n

where P_m is the solution of Bessel Function J_0(x)=0

Regards

Hector
 
Right, so the only non-zero term in the sum

\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}A_m\sinh\left(\frac{P_m h}{a}\right)\left[\int_0^aJ_0\left(\frac{P_m r}{a}\right) J_0\left(\frac{P_n r}{a}\right)rdr\right]

will be the m=n term.

\implies\int_0^a U_0 J_0\left(\frac{P_m r}{a}\right)rdr=A_m\sinh\left(\frac{P_m h}{a}\right)\int_0^a\left[J_0\left(\frac{P_m r}{a}\right)\right]^2 rdr
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top