About the Analytical Physics constraint writing.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of constraint values in Analytical Physics, specifically the use of d/2, where d represents the diameter of a disc. The participant seeks clarification on why the unwound string length is expressed as d/2 multiplied by the angle of rotation, φ. It is noted that the radius of the disc is indeed d/2, leading to the formula for the unwound string length being radius times the angle. The inquiry emphasizes the need for a clearer understanding of this relationship in the context of the problem presented. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of grasping the fundamental concepts of rotational motion and constraints in physics.
opeth_35
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
About the Analytical Physics constraint writing...

I have added a photo about my problem. My problem is why did we write while calculating constraint values as d/2. you will see on the picture what I am saying, I cannot see the reason of writing d/2
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0460.jpg
    IMG_0460.jpg
    49.3 KB · Views: 462
Physics news on Phys.org


I guess from what I see, that d is the diameter of the disc and \phi is the angle the disc rotated. Then the radius of the disc would be d/2. So the length of the string unwound will be radius times the angle rotated, or \frac{d}{2} \phi.
 


thank you for explaining :)
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top