Acetic Acid + Ammonium Hydroxide Vapours

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the safety and toxicity of smoke created from mixing Acetic Acid and Ammonium Hydroxide in special effects for movies. The primary concern is the toxicity of the resulting smoke, which consists of ammonium acetate particles and water vapor. The MSDS safety sheet classifies the mixture as an irritant to eyes, throat, and lungs, but there is uncertainty regarding the specific toxicity of the smoke itself. Participants suggest relying on MSDS guidelines for safety, noting that while ammonium acetate is not considered highly toxic, prolonged exposure should be avoided.
Janson Raymond Kenny
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi!
I work in the movie business doing Special Effects.
To create smoke for some effects we use "A+B Smoke." It is simply a mix of Acetic Acid (Part A) and Ammonium Hydroxide (Part B).
However, the smoke effects is created when the VAPOURS of these 2 chemicals mix in the air.

The MSDS Safety sheet lists the resulting mix as only an "irritant" to eyes, throat, and lungs HOWEVER, I believe these safety ratings are based on the solid remainder of Ammonium Acetate. (I hope that is correct) I am more concerned about the toxicity of the resulting SMOKE and not the solid remainder.

What is the resulting toxicity of these two chemicals reacting together?
What is the toxicity of the VAPOURS/Smoke created by mixing these chemicals?

Any help would be greatly appreciated
Thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Janson Raymond Kenny said:
I am more concerned about the toxicity of the resulting SMOKE and not the solid remainder.
Smoke is just a solid dispersed in air. In this case, the smoke is made up of tiny ammonium acetate particles dispersed in the air. The only other product is water.
 
Thanks for your quick reply...
Any idea how toxic ammonium acetate is when inhaled?
 
Janson Raymond Kenny said:
Any idea how toxic ammonium acetate is when inhaled?
I would go with whatever the MSDS says. I doubt it's terribly toxic, but I wouldn't recommend lots and lots of exposure to it.
 
Engineers slash iridium use in electrolyzer catalyst by 80%, boosting path to affordable green hydrogen https://news.rice.edu/news/2025/engineers-slash-iridium-use-electrolyzer-catalyst-80-boosting-path-affordable-green Ruthenium is also fairly expensive (a year ago it was about $490/ troy oz, but has nearly doubled in price over the past year, now about $910/ troy oz). I tracks prices of Pt, Pd, Ru, Ir and Ru. Of the 5 metals, rhodium (Rh) is the most expensive. A year ago, Rh and Ir...
Back
Top