Adding Two Spins to Vector Quantities

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quarlep
  • Start date Start date
Quarlep
Messages
257
Reaction score
4
Spin is a quantity of vector but I don't know how to add them ? Please be simple
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know if that's simple enough, but in QM spin is not an ordinary vector. In general, in QM when you have two systems (say two particles) represented by |\psi_1\rangle and |\psi_2\rangle, the total state composed by the two particles is given by their tensor product: |\psi_{tot}\rangle=|\psi_1\rangle|\psi_2\rangle.

The same thing is valid for spins. If you have two particles with, for example, spins S_1=1/2 and S_2=1/2, then the total spin S=S_1+S_2 is given by the tensor product |S\rangle=|S_1,S_{1z}\rangle|S_2,S_{2z}\rangle, where S_{iz} is the value of the third component of the i-th spin. To do this composition you need the so called Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. Anyway, the final spin can be S=0,1 and the value of its third component is given by this tables.

This is very very shortly explained but I hope is clear enough.
 
Yeah its clear enough thanks
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
139
Replies
61
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
59
Views
7K
Back
Top