Undergrad AI Discovers Alternate Physics - What Do You Think?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joseph M. Zias
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ai Physics
Click For Summary
An AI analyzed a classic double pendulum experiment and proposed using 4.7 variables to describe its motion, raising questions about the interpretation of these variables. The discussion suggests that the AI's approach might indicate alternative methods of analyzing physical phenomena, potentially hinting at different frameworks of physics. Some participants speculate that this could parallel the idea of a galactic civilization having its own "new physics." The mention of chaos theory and fractals introduces the concept of non-integer dimensions as a possible explanation for the 4.7 variables. Overall, the conversation explores the implications of AI in redefining our understanding of physical laws.
Joseph M. Zias
Messages
85
Reaction score
30
TL;DR
Recent article describes using AI to view classic pendulum experiment. Finds different variable to analyze the event.
There is a recent article, see below, where an AI equipped computer viewed a classic physics experiment with a double pendulum. The AI algorithm determined some different variables to describe the motion. One problem with this is the AI suggested 4.7 variables - that I don't understand - but nevertheless it is plausible that the analysis of physical events might be done differently. It was suggested that another galactic civilization might have a "new physics" as-it-were. What do you folks think of this?

https://www.sciencealert.com/ai-has...News&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=AppleNews
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like a fun experiment. It is possible that the AI considers position, velocity, acceleration
, and jerk as four independent variables.
 
Joseph M. Zias said:
Summary: Recent article describes using AI to view classic pendulum experiment. Finds different variable to analyze the event.

One problem with this is the AI suggested 4.7 variables - that I don't understand - but nevertheless ...
I haven't read the paper (paywall: https://www.nature.com/articles/s43588-022-00281-6) and I'm not sure if it explains 4.7 at all, but my first thought was:

A double pendulum is chaos theory. Chaos theory uses fractals. Fractals have non-integer dimensions. A dimension can be interpreted as a degree of freedom, hence a free variable. Such an interpretation could have led to the catch phrase: 4.7 dimensions.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and berkeman
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
503K
Replies
26
Views
9K
  • · Replies 142 ·
5
Replies
142
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K