Algebraic expression rewritting

  • Thread starter Thread starter J Goodrich
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
AI Thread Summary
The expression (a+b)^(1/3) + (a-b)^(1/3) cannot be simplified into a finite expansion or combined under a single radical. It evaluates exactly to 1, despite appearing complex, and any calculator would only provide an approximate value. The discussion references Cardano's cubic formula, illustrating how to derive the roots of a cubic equation. The specific case presented shows that the expression corresponds to a real root of the cubic equation x^3 + x - 2 = 0. Ultimately, the only real solution to this equation is x = 1, confirming the original expression's value.
J Goodrich
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
is there any expansion of

(a+b)^(1/3) + (a-b)^(1/3)

or any other manipulation that could be done to rewrite this expression, perhaps under one radical or in some other way rather than the addition of two radicals?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
there is no finite expansion.
 
So \sqrt[3]{1 + \sqrt{28/27}} + \sqrt[3]{1 - \sqrt{28/27}} has no simpler form?
 
no. it is a nonrepeating real number and and the expression you wrote is the exact one. most of the (algebraic) numbers are like that only.
 
Actually, there is a very easy way of writing that: it is 1!

You could, of course, do that computation on a calculator and get the result "1" but that would only show that it is "approximately" 1. I mean that it is exactly 1.

I noticed that this looks a lot like the form of solution one would expect from Cardano's cubic formula. The basic idea goes like this:

Let x= a+ b. Then x^3= a^3+ 3a^2b+ 3ab^2+ b^3. Also, -3abx= -3ab(a+ b)= -3a^2b- 3ab^2 so that x^3- 3abx= a^3+ b^3. Now let m= 3ab and n= a^3+ b^3 and we have shown that x satisfies x^3- mx= n.

Now, what about the other way around? Suppose we are given m and n. Can we find a and b and so find x= a+ b satisfying the "reduced cubic" x^3- mx= n?

Yes, we can! From m= 3ab, b= m/3a. Then n= a^3- b^3= a^3- m^3/(3^3a^3) and, multiplying by a^3, we get the quadratic, in a^3, na^3= (a^3)^2- (m/3)^3 or (a^3)^2- n(a^3)- (m/3)^3. By the quadratic formula, that has solution
a^3= \frac{n\pm\sqrt{n^2- 4(m/3)^3}}{2}= \frac{n}{2}\pm\sqrt{(n/2)^2- (m/3)^3z}

If we take the positive sign, then, from b^3= n- a^3, we have
b^3= \frac{n}{2}- \sqrt{(n/2)^3- (m/3)^3} and x= a+ b.

Now doesn't
\sqrt[3]{1+ \sqrt{\frac{28}{27}}+\sqrt[3]{1- \sqrt{\frac{28}{27}}
look exactly like that?

Of course that means that n/2= 1 and that (n/2)^2+ (m/3)^3= 28/27 Putting n/2= 1 into the second of those, (m/3)^3= 28/27- 1= -1/27 and m/3= -1/3 so m= -1. That means that the given number is a real root of x^3- mx= x^3+ x= n= 2. Obviously, x= 1 is a root of that equation and, dividing by x-1, x^3+ x- 2= (x-1)(x^2+ x+ 2)= 0. But, by the quadratic formula, x^2+ x+ 2= 0 has NO real roots. The only real root is x= 1 and that must be the one given:
\sqrt[3]{1 + \sqrt{28/27}} + \sqrt[3]{1 - \sqrt{28/27}}= 1
 
good joke Goodrich :)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Back
Top